Jump to content

Edl'S Response To Rumours Of Attacking Gurdware Etc


Hau Apraadhi
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sadly the EDL is against Muslims as a whole and I can give a long list of speeches and videos of their leaders saying Islam is evil blah, blah. They march into areas hurling abuse at their women and children and chant vile, disgusting things such as "Allah is a .....", you get the message. Would we ever tolerate such an organisation that did the same? Let's hypothetically say an Indian nationalist organisation was set up, that targeted Khalistan supporters, or in their mind extremists. They would say that our Gudwaras were preaching hate, organised marches to Sikh dominated areas, hurling abuse. We would go mad.

Here is a video of them just last night trying to attack any black youths they saw. People can say what they want but when the crap hits the fan these people go back to their basic instincts of hating people.

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=rC_VsYxLao4

In that situation the Sikh community would respond with a counter organisation showing hindustani terrorism and congress athiest state terrorism. Our community has lost over 100,000 civilans in india due to Indian state terrorism since 1947. So any organisation that wants to paint Khalistan advocates in a bad light they can expect a stronger counter anti-hindustan organisation with more damming evidence of terrorism against civilians. So it wouldnt be a wise move for pro-indian unionists.

As for that video, as i said before EDL can be easily infiltrated by neo-nazi's as it doesnt have a proper membership and command structure. You cant verify who is who, until they make it clear who are its members you can suspect or you can deny they are EDL.

I have seen some real moronic so called EDL members and it does reflect very badly on the english white community. I'm not gonna stand up for EDL because I believe in all communities coming together and getting along, but for those who are in EDL im sure they can make themselves clear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what i made from the video only a few EDL memebers (50 max). Now those whites that were attacking the blacks at the bus stop how do you know if they were edl or just local white people? Anyone can say EDL EDL blah blah and feel part of something

EDL hate islam because its a hateful ideology that teaches death to non-muslims or convert.... which is clearly happening in nearly all muslim countries like pakistan, bangladesh for example. Look at christian churches being burnt down in egypt and other arab countries

The demonstration was the official one organised by the EDL. So someone who is at the demo, is chanting their slogan and commits a crime suddenly is an outsider? Would you give the same leeway to an Islamic extremist group who did the same? No you wouldn't. The video hasn't escaped the attention of many black folk, where it has been posted on their message board along with others. Anger is massive.

As for what you said about Islam, that' in stark contrast to what my master, the king of kings, the saint of saints, Guru Gobind Singh jee said;

"The temple or the mosque are the same, the Hindu worship or the Musalman prayer are the same; all men are the same; it is through error they appear different. Deities, demons, Yakshas, heavenly singers, Musalmans and Hindus adopt the customary dress of their different countries. All men have the same eyes, the same ears, the same body, the same build, a compound of earth, air, fire, and water. Allah and Abhekh are the same, the Purans and the Quran are the same; they are all alike; it is the one God who created all. The Hindu God and the Muhammadan God are the same; let no man even by mistake suppose there is a difference."

I'll end it that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EDL hate Islam fullstop. That's wrong. As we saw on Sangat TV Sikhs and Muslims were united, if they hate all then why did they unite? BNP/EDL are the same under a new banner.

Sikhs, Christians, Muslims, HIndus, Buddhists, Jews are and should be united against such organisations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be because they know they are under the cosh now. They've picked a fight with the kalay since the 2005 riots and one of the kalay took out three of their number. Kalay were going around in car shouting that they were going to burn all the mosques down so they needed non-Muslims on their side. If the Pakis rioted then they would have got a worst reputation than they have had already. Now they can use the Sikhs and any Sikhs showing up at their memorial events are just showing the goray that Sikhs are the same as Muslims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use