Jump to content

Ask Your Sikhi Related Questions To Sant Baba Hari Singh Ji Randhave Wale


Recommended Posts

Are Heaven/Hell actual places? If Hell is an actual place for paying for ones sin, then why is there a need for reincarnation then as reincarnation is for paying back sin?

What's the difference between Heavan & Sachkhand?

Is Sachkhand an actual place?

Why do Nirgun Upshaks say there is no Heavan/Hell?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Raja Janak liberated hence obtained sachkand from the gyan and naam he received from his Guru Ashtavakra? As some groups believe that he could not get to sachkand because he did not receive naam from Guru nanak dev ji or he had to wait for guru ji to get mukhti.

When Gurbani talks about mukhti (liberation) in sri guru granth sahib ji is it referring to sackhand? Or does it mean heaven/ indarpuri etc in some places?

ਅਜਾਮਲੁ ਗਨਿਕਾ ਜਿਹ ਸਿਮਰਤ ਮੁਕਤ ਭਏ ਜੀਅ ਜਾਨੋ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ

Remembering Him in meditation, even Ajaamal the robber and Ganikaa the prostitute were liberated; let your soul know this. ||1||Pause||

ਅਜੈਮਲ ਕੀਓ ਬੈਕੁੰਠਹਿ ਥਾਨ

and gave Ajaamal a place with God.

So from the above tuks did ganikaa, ajaamal get realisation (Sachkand) or did they go to heaven (temporary realms) etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who would be asking these questions? would recording will be available afterwards? Do you guys need any help with translating the questions in punjabi? ..don't want the words/essence/actual meaning of questions lost in translations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an awesome question to ask, thanks for bring it up.

But let's think about it ourselves! In Sri Sukhmani Sahib Da Paath, we are told Brahmgyani and Vaheguru are one and the same. So the question that arise, once someone says there are 3 kinds of Brahmgyanis. How many kinds of Vaheguru`s are there? Let's put it in a different way. There is Vaheguru, SatGuru Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji Maharaj, and 10 Gurus in human body. How many kinds of Gurus are there? A person might say there are three, but Gurmukhs laugh and say there is only One!!!! Also how many Hukam's are there? Again the answer here is only One. The Hindus proclaimed that there was the Creator, the Perserver, and the Destroyer. Again the answer to such a statement was that, there is only One. And about following Rehat. How many truth are there? Does Truth ever contradict itself. Some are stuck on chitr and Gupt, all they see is good and bad. Rehat is neither good or bad, it is above such low thinking and Rehat is the truth. When Satguru says Satnaam in Sri Mool Mantar Sahib, Rehat is the Sat, which came from Vaheguru. Satguru Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji Maharaj tells us the Khalsa is his everything and strength. Khalsa built on Rehat.....so Satguru says Rehat is my strength. It again comes back to Sat (Truth) is my strength.

You can't separate Truth from the One (Vaheguru). The truth and the one (Vaheguru) are the same. Truth is not a attribute of Sri Vaheguru Ji Maharaj in the Sargun form. Truth is one with Akal Purakh in the formless.

There is only One.

I only want to ask to know what Baba Hari Singh thinks about this. I do not believe in this 3 states of Brahmgian. Makes no sense to me.

singhhg

I am sure sant hari singh randhawa wale will clarify on above question- he may or may not full clarify because of political correctness nature of question. Ask him to be fully candid about it just like how gyani thakur singh ji patiala wale did in japji sahib katha.

Just for the record, three natures/kind of bhramgyanis its just not some concept from thin air i created. I came across with it from sant jagjit singh ji harkhowale pustak- The Radiance of complete journey to Akaal Purkh by Sant baba Jagjit Singh Ji Harkhowaley..you can look it up.

Harkhowale samparda is bhai dya singh ji upsamparda going back all the way to bhai dya singh ji just like how taksal goes back to baba deep singh ji. Nirmalaie samparda like- Bhai Dya Singh Ji Samparda and Bhai Dharam Singh Samparda is as significant to khalsa panth as damdami taksal is to khalsa panth. There are no significant difference in school of thoughts between them.

Is that why Baba Jagjit Singh Harkholwale says Krishan is God and in Sachkhand and Taksal says he is NOT God and NOT in Sachkhand?

Taksal promotes far more Gurmat than any other Samparda. The rest are stuck in Vedant Manmat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taksal promotes far more Gurmat than any other Samparda. The rest are stuck in Vedant Manmat.

No knowledge about certain things is better than half arse knowledge..please create a different topic..i will list all the contributions nirmale made to khalsa panth and how taksal has heavy nirmaley influence..this is not to brag about but to set the record straight...!!

You can take taksal out of nirmalaie but you cannot take nirmalaie influence from taksal !!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[/font][/color]

No knowledge about certain things is better than half arse knowledge..please create a different topic..i will list all the contributions nirmale made to khalsa panth and how taksal has heavy nirmaley influence..this is not to brag about but to set the record straight...!!

You can take taksal out of nirmalaie but you cannot take nirmalaie influence from taksal !!!!!!!!!!

I don't recall mentioning that the Taksal does not have nirmala influence. All I said was that it promotes and follows Gurmat more so than any other samparda. The other sampardas are heavily influenced by vedant, more so than the Taksal is. The Taksal has enough bibek budhi (in most cases) to seperate itself from Vedant Manmat, and other things such as Jhatka, Bhang, Aarti Pooja etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't recall mentioning that the Taksal does not have nirmala influence. All I said was that it promotes and follows Gurmat more so than any other samparda. The other sampardas are heavily influenced by vedant, more so than the Taksal is. The Taksal has enough bibek budhi (in most cases) to seperate itself from Vedant Manmat, and other things such as Jhatka, Bhang, Aarti Pooja etc.

Are you seriously taking an piss? Since when jhatka, bhang or aarti-pooja part of vedant? :omg:

Vedant is science of atma-paratma. Have you ever listened to sant hari singh randhawa waley katha? He covers all gurmat advait vedant listed below...this is first time i heard vedant is manmat, its like science is manmat...what's next? air is manmat? water is manmat? earth is manmat? fire is manmat? sky is manmat? why its because listed in some puratan hindu granth...pretty insecure and over parnioa attitude

- concept of panj tats, 25 parkrityas, 17 sukhsham tat, karan sirar

- panj pran, sub pranas, upan, dhyan

- panj gyan indraies, karam indraies

-jagrath, suapoan, sukhopat, turiya avastha

- sato, rajo, tamogun

- panj koshas

- 5 chakras and dasam duar

- different types of shabad

- antish karan

-parloa, maha parloa

- keraman, sanchit and parlabdh karam

There are much more, here is an glimpse

http://www.sikhaware...char-must-read/

http://www.sikhaware...-vichar-part-2/

http://www.sikhaware...-vichar-part-3/

It's science of atma-paratma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Raja Janak liberated hence obtained sachkand from the gyan and naam he received from his Guru Ashtavakra? As some groups believe that he could not get to sachkand because he did not receive naam from Guru nanak dev ji or he had to wait for guru ji to get mukhti.

When Gurbani talks about mukhti (liberation) in sri guru granth sahib ji is it referring to sackhand? Or does it mean heaven/ indarpuri etc in some places?

ਅਜਾਮਲੁ ਗਨਿਕਾ ਜਿਹ ਸਿਮਰਤ ਮੁਕਤ ਭਏ ਜੀਅ ਜਾਨੋ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ

Remembering Him in meditation, even Ajaamal the robber and Ganikaa the prostitute were liberated; let your soul know this. ||1||Pause||

ਅਜੈਮਲ ਕੀਓ ਬੈਕੁੰਠਹਿ ਥਾਨ

and gave Ajaamal a place with God.

So from the above tuks did ganikaa, ajaamal get realisation (Sachkand) or did they go to heaven (temporary realms) etc?

I found the answers to the questions I posted so you don't need to ask Sant Hari Singh ji. From sant Isher Singh ji's audio and videos. Basically Ajaamal and Ganikha obtained sackhand/baikunt. Sant isher singh clarifyes this in the audio below.

http://www.sikhroots.com/audio/Lectures/Sant%20Baba%20Isher%20singh%20Ji%20-%20Rara%20Sahib/Sant_Isher_Singh_Ji_-_Ganka_(Gaie_Baikunth_Bivaan_ChaSant_Isher_Singh_Ji.mp3

23 mins - sant ji talks about how the mahapuraks helped liberate ganika. Even though she japped raam she still got to sachkand.

67 - 75 mins - sant ji says baikunt in her case was sachkand.

The video below 4 mins+ sant ji describes heaven/indarpuri as being temporary not peacful and a place where you get all your wants - the people who get here are ones that do simran but still have desires and are not detached. But baikunt as permanant peace ie. sachkand; only get this without desires. Also he confirms the meanings of baikunt in the audio I have stated above.

So ajaamal ganika all got sachkand even though they japped raam/naraayan according to Sant Isher Singh Ji.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use