Jump to content

Ask Your Sikhi Related Questions To Sant Baba Hari Singh Ji Randhave Wale


Recommended Posts

Please do not ruin the thread by starting random debates with fellow memebers. The title is self explanatory, please stick to the theme of asking questions only. You can always open a new thread to discuss things amongst yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you seriously taking an piss? Since when jhatka, bhang or aarti-pooja part of vedant? :omg:

Vedant is science of atma-paratma. Have you ever listened to sant hari singh randhawa waley katha? He covers all gurmat advait vedant listed below...this is first time i heard vedant is manmat, its like science is manmat...what's next? air is manmat? water is manmat? earth is manmat? fire is manmat? sky is manmat? why its because listed in some puratan hindu granth...pretty insecure and over parnioa attitude

- concept of panj tats, 25 parkrityas, 17 sukhsham tat, karan sirar

- panj pran, sub pranas, upan, dhyan

- panj gyan indraies, karam indraies

-jagrath, suapoan, sukhopat, turiya avastha

- sato, rajo, tamogun

- panj koshas

- 5 chakras and dasam duar

- different types of shabad

- antish karan

-parloa, maha parloa

- keraman, sanchit and parlabdh karam

There are much more, here is an glimpse

http://www.sikhaware...char-must-read/

http://www.sikhaware...-vichar-part-2/

http://www.sikhaware...-vichar-part-3/

It's science of atma-paratma.

If you read my post correctly you would see I said AND OTHER THINGS such as jhatka...

No where did I say Jhatka, Bhang is part of Vedant.

I am not denying Vedant that comes under Gurmat. Stop ruining this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not denying Vedant that comes under Gurmat. Stop ruining this thread.

Exactly, its not deny all or accept all, as some would want others to believe and then accept. Reading the Rig Veda, it is easy to understand they are doing rituals to preserver the earth. They believe if they don't perform these rituals, then the earth will be finished. This is manmat to the core. There is no talk about Atman equals Brahman in Rig Veda. Only later, many years later do the Vedant school come up with Atman equals Brahman in the Katha of Upanishads. Then many many years later do they come up with devotional service, where Krishna teaches Arjuna, but still they teach many manmat things along the way. Like the varna system and the sanskrit language can only be spoken by the higher caste and Krishna telling Arjuna (everyone) should worship Krishna. Krishna also tells people to make statues of him and then start worshipping them as they will be worshipping Krishna.

The list goes on, but i guess the picture has been painted clearly here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly, its not deny all or accept all, as some would want others to believe and then accept. Reading the Rig Veda, it is easy to understand they are doing rituals to preserver the earth. They believe if they don't perform these rituals, then the earth will be finished. This is manmat to the core. There is no talk about Atman equals Brahman in Rig Veda. Only later, many years later do the Vedant school come up with Atman equals Brahman in the Katha of Upanishads. Then many many years later do they come up with devotional service, where Krishna teaches Arjuna, but still they teach many manmat things along the way. Like the varna system and the sanskrit language can only be spoken by the higher caste and Krishna telling Arjuna (everyone) should worship Krishna. Krishna also tells people to make statues of him and then start worshipping them as they will be worshipping Krishna.

The list goes on, but i guess the picture has been painted clearly here.

Yes!! Great to know someone else who feels the same way. I was starting to worry that all this Vedant Manmat has taken over Gurmat!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advait Vedant = Ant of Vedas- tat nichor of all vedas- there is no manmat in vedant. Yes there are lot of things in vedas which is contary to gurmat in vedas but vedant which is tat nichor of vedas does not have manmat but only tat gyan...!!!!!!!!!!

I guess its best interest for everyone to stick to the thread rather playing with semantics of vedant and dance around it just for sake of winning an argument...pretty desperate, sadistic and lame actually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes!! Great to know someone else who feels the same way. I was starting to worry that all this Vedant Manmat has taken over Gurmat!

Many of there followers are trying to fool the new generations by their tricks, but tricks are for kids. Some of them get sucked in because many things sound similar and they can't tell the difference, but Satguru taught the correct path. Education on these scriptures is a must and it really opens the eyes to how backwards they were and still are and telling others to do the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jatka, bhang etc....vedant

Waheguru waheguru

If maharaj guru gobind singh ji was around today most if not all sampadars would get a slap

Jatka, bhang etc may not be needed in todays age but it is and always will be apart of the khalsa panth

Stop turning it into a dirty secret within sikhi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use