Jump to content

Question About Khalistan


Recommended Posts

If Khalistan was ever to exist it would be a landlocked country. Countries like this have limited trade potential and have to rely on their neighbours to import and export goods by sea.

If Khalistan ever comes to being it will make India an enemy and Pakistan is also an enemy. So what is the solution to this?

And yes Pakistan is an enemy, we should never take their help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Khalistan was ever to exist it would be a landlocked country. Countries like this have limited trade potential and have to rely on their neighbours to import and export goods by sea.

If Khalistan ever comes to being it will make India an enemy and Pakistan is also an enemy. So what is the solution to this?

And yes Pakistan is an enemy, we should never take their help.

Maharaja Ranjit Singh's empire was landlocked, with a hostile british india to the south and east, and a hostile neighbour to the north, afghanistan, and tibet/china to the northeast.

I dont think we need to worry too much about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wats ur perception of the map of khalistan?

Isn't it just the state of Punjab in India?

I don't think it's possible for a very long time, but in the future I can see the subcontinent split into smaller states like the USSR. This would also be the most peaceful way. A velvet divorce.

The real chance was in 1947 but Tara Singh made a blunder.

The only way it can be achieved though is if the majority of Sikhs actually living in India want it, not the ones living in the UK or Canada. From my last two trips to India it doesn't seem that many people want it. In fact most youth I met just want to go abroad to make money.

That is one thing that struck me about Punjab, a lot of the youth are lazy but will work hard when they go abroad. Why not work hard in your own country?

Things like the quota system don't help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well in my opinion Khalistan must be demanded minimally as Panjab, Haryana, Himachal and northern parts of rajastan.

by the way i presume u r new 2 this forum, but its best u jus contribute to older discussions of khalistan, coz its been discussed 2 the max, as u can imagine.

try this thread mate

http://www.sikhsanga...inst-khalistan/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well in my opinion Khalistan must be demanded minimally as Panjab, Haryana, Himachal and northern parts of rajastan.

by the way i presume u r new 2 this forum, but its best u jus contribute to older discussions of khalistan, coz its been discussed 2 the max, as u can imagine.

try this thread mate

http://www.sikhsanga...inst-khalistan/

If that's the case, it will be a Sikh minority state!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that's the case, it will be a Sikh minority state!

yup! jus like jalandhar was muslim majority @ partition aswel as other places, but we managed 2 get that, even after we massacred muslims to the max. Remember u have urself mentioned master tara and our other leaders like baldev singh who sold us out, have u wondered wat land was offered 2 us then? It is incidentally current panjab, 80% of now haryana, himachal & i believe also nankana sahib. so we deserve everythig back that was promised, but those sikhs who want west panjab back from pakistan, r living in dream land tho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use