Jump to content

Question About Khalistan


Recommended Posts

Far from wanting to challenge the orders given by Singh Sahib Sri Maan Sant Jarnail Singh Ji Khalsa Bhindranwale, but can any Sikhs envisage that should political, economic and social reform on a mass scale occur in for Panjab and Indian Sikhs, Sikhs may find it acceptable to remain in India. The Khalistan question is an extremely difficult to answer as all solutions eventually lead to a dead end atm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, so all of the old east Punjab was promised to us? Where's the evidence?

http://www.panthkhal...aj/raj_1947.php

read it. theres probably other sources, but i cant b asked 2 find em, ive discused this 2 the limit so many times, its boring now to be honest. like i said before rather than carrying on with this thead, u shud jus search for older threads on khalistan n re-start them threads, oh n read through em 2. if u did, u wudda found the link ive given.

safe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are people dreaming too much, if Khalistan is ever made it will only be the state of Punjab. India is too powerful, Punjab is land locked, its main industry is agriculture, for any economy to compete in this modern day and age it needs to be based on manufacturing or services which is minimal in punjab. Who ever said aircrafts are convenient for importing and exporting probably do not know the cost of this operation. To enhance trade with the rest of the world every country needs to build ports, there is no place in punjab for ports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are people dreaming too much, if Khalistan is ever made it will only be the state of Punjab. India is too powerful, Punjab is land locked, its main industry is agriculture, for any economy to compete in this modern day and age it needs to be based on manufacturing or services which is minimal in punjab. Who ever said aircrafts are convenient for importing and exporting probably do not know the cost of this operation. To enhance trade with the rest of the world every country needs to build ports, there is no place in punjab for ports.

You talk a lot of sense my friend. Also we need to change our mentality. Whenever it comes to politics we turn to violence. Whether that's in parliamentary elections or gurdwara elections.

Punjab is one of the few states in India where alcohol shops are shut on election day due to the violence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Khalistan was ever to exist it would be a landlocked country. Countries like this have limited trade potential and have to rely on their neighbours to import and export goods by sea.

UK = Paji, i stopped considering Khalistan (within the boundaries of modern day Punjab) as the best way forward for our Panth after 1997. From 1984 I had wholeheartedly believe in our separation from rule by a terrorist central state. In the subsequent time since 1984, Sikhs have now even become a minority within the Doaba (thanks to our own ineptitude in dealing with jaath-paath baqwaas) meaning that any plebiscite-granted Khalistan would realistically be limited to Majha and Malwa regions only. Having said that, the argument against Khalistan should not really be opposed on the grounds of viability. Punjab is certainly viable economically even as a landlocked state. You only have to look at Switzerland as an example of a successful landlocked state. The main argument against raising naaray for Khalistan in 2012 lies in the separate Gurdware pinda vich, the levels of female infanticide in Punjab, the levels of literacy in Punjab and the scale of the drugs epidemic in Punjab. We need to tackle the more pressing immediate issues which are within our ability to change right now before thinking of Khalistan in one giant leap via the same method that 1984-1995 failed to achieve. When we achieve united Gurdwara, equal male/female ratio's, 100% literacy and instil the discipline to resist drugs and alcohol amongst 99.9% of Sikh youth ... then not only will Punjab be ours for the taking ... i genuinely believe that hundreds of millions of folks currently classified as Hindu could come to Sikhi of their own will ... thereby laying the ground for the whole of India to be a de facto become Khalistan or a Desh of Begumpura's. Yeah I know that seems a dream but let's at least work towards that vision within our own abilities. Less lives will be lost that way and with that there will be Sarbat da Bhala.

Shamshere = If Khalistan ever comes to being it will make India an enemy and Pakistan is also an enemy. So what is the solution to this? And yes Pakistan is an enemy, we should never take their help.

UK = True, the Indian Government of 1984 most certainly was a terrorist enemy of Sikhs and Pakistan expresses its open enmity to Sikhs daily by supplying the fuel for much of the drugs crisis in Punjab and how they were instrumental in ethnically cleansing the Afghan Sikhs recently. However, with Dr Manmohan Singh now the Prime Minister of India, The Head of the Indian Army also a Sikh, as is the Senior Economic Planner and chief UN representative etc, etc we have to recognise that India has changed a lot and take advantage of that rather than continually looking back to 1984 as the sole prism with which to view all political matters. For example, several Indian states now support the thrust of the Anandpur Sahib resolution to a great degree and we need to garner their support to ensure greater federalism is a starting point. That way, a federal structure of independent states within an EU or ASEAN type federation is what India could conceivably become. Obviously, if India did magically disintegrate like the USSR or Yugoslavia nobody would say "no". But even if central state interference with Sikhi stopped completely and simply federalism occurred, then even with that freedom alone Sikhi could grow like wildfire amongst what are termed Hindu masses outside of Punjab. The only way our enemies keep Sikhi down is by falsely associating it with terrorism (and by seeking to limit the definition of a Sikh to as small a number of people as possible), which sadly some have wrongly come to believe. Dr Manmohan Singh has been crucial in combatting the propaganda of the Indira+Rajiv era. It's a shame, however, he has been unable to deliver justice to the innocent Sikh victims of the Genocide our Panth suffered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use