Jump to content

Caste system divide - when will it ever stop


Beard
 Share

Recommended Posts

Caste or ethnic group discrimination is unacceptable. Having differences otherwise, based on caste or ethnic group is something to be valued in terms of its diversification. I had a Ramgarhia friend in college who was good at DIY (not my forte at all - got him to put up my shelves for me) and I used to joke that is because of his Tarkhan heritage, whilst he'd admire my garden/ veg plot (his was overgrown and wild and I cleared it for him) and in the same joking vein he'd say its because of my Jatt background. Now either way this does not make any difference in the real world. Not every Tarkhan is a born carpenter and not every Jatt is a born farmer.

When I am back in my pendh I go to the gym in the mornings and its quite a small room above the school, with meagre and basic equipment by western standards. However all the lads are there - Jatt, Churah, Chamar, Kamboh, Bahman...Everyone helps each other eg spotting for someone and everyone sweats togather - never seen any caste discrimination. As long as you contribute Rs200 a month then you're one of the boys!

What I cannot stand is the reservation system in India. Positive discrimination is just an excuse for a poor education sytem that fails the less well off. Its like here in my country (the UK), I do not like the way some universities add weight to the fact that a school is regarded as disadvantaged and therefore bump up the face value grades.

Why be upset about being told that you are to marry within a certain group - our Gurus did not marry out of caste. Your parents will choose someone with your best interests at heart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest dasguruka

Can we stop worrying about what people think of others and actually focus our attention on the Guru? This could solve it. If everyone realized that they're only deceiving themselves by being labeled and ignoring the bigger picture then the castes wouldn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So, are you saying Guru ji isn't God? Or are you saying the British encouraged this belief?
    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use