Jump to content

Gunmen Shoot At Sikh Men In Peshawar Market, One Dead


Recommended Posts

Everyone knows that Khalistan movement was violent

Who is everyone? I don't understand one thing about you guys, maybe since you're on here you might clarify it for me. Your entire country calls anyone who kills Indians/Hindus as "terrorist", be it someone who claims to be a Muslim or a Sikh. Well where do you burn your dictionaries when those who are massacred are Muslims or Sikhs? Why are they not granted the privilege to be called terrorists as well? Those who orchestrated 1984, 1992, 1993 and 2002, not once has your media called them terrorist. Those who attacked mosques and Gurduara Sahibs, not once has your media named them as extremists.

Chalo I'll cut you some slack, because your journalists are terribly horrible and are more of entertainers. Why hasn't any judicial entity dared to call it terrorism? Howcome they are called "mobs", "politicians", "army", "cops"? They do exactly what terrorists do, so why not call a spade a spade?

We are equally sad for any innocent who gets killed, be he/she of any religion. When innocent Indians/Hindus are killed, its Islamic terrorists or Sikh extremists. When innocent Sikhs or Muslims are slaughtered under the banner of religion/patriotism/nationalism, then its mobs? Who do you think you're fooling? Call them also terrorists! Whether its Tytler, or Sajjan Kumar, or Kamal Nath, or Thackeray (good riddance), or Modi, or RSS, or Shiv Sena, or VHP, or Bajrang Dal, call them what they should be fairly called, and call it firmly!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sardar jee, aapne aaj jyada chadha rakhi hai.

You low life maggot, that is enough to show the kind of mentality and attitude you and your disgusting likes have for Sikhs. Thats all you see us as, alcoholic clowns. Go read a real history book wr

Beta jis din chaddh ke aa gaye, tumhein dhoti sambhaalne ka samay nahi milega.

It's Hindus who died to save Sikhs. 2 killed out of 3 were Hindus.

That is from your BJP newsreader.

Gujarat riot was reaction of it

So you acknowledge and justify it. Shame on you!

Christian missionary r converting hindu by coercion! Do you want to see more kerela where Non muslim have no clout.

India is for dharmic faith!

Then sorry to say India will be the size of Sri Lanka some day. And if you wanted to stop these missionaries, then you wouldn't treat people like animals after branding them "lower caste" and "untouchable", which is why they embraced Christianity so that they could atleast get food and blankets. YOU are responsible for it!

No Indian Sikh can blame BJP for Sikhs problems.

You are right, we blame Congress as well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont want to discuss with Khalistani Pakistani!

Looks like both of those identities make you wet your bed every night.

Sikhs are essence of our country & they hate ISI sponsored Pawns SFJ & other NGO!

Is that an excuse to not do justice? Scared already?

we can see whose agenda you are running here.

The topic is about Sikhs being killed in Pak & you are blaming India for it!!

The only agenda here is to have you open your eyes. Our blood is not water which can be shed, its as red as your blood, its human blood.

As for Pakistan and ISI, neither you and your likes have any sympathy with us, neither do they. Their style is annihilate and destroy, yours is assimilate and destroy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advani is no BJP leader now. Modi and Advani r miles apart.

Dont make your own story. U have to accept that Khalistani like you were nuisance to India in 1984!

Even now some of you act <banned word filter activated> and make clown of yourself by waging Pakistani agenda!

Sikhs in India laugh at you & make fun of ISI sponsored Khalistani living in their dreamworld!

Modi just came now. But for all those years, Advani was the major leader of BJP/Jan Sangh. The BJP put pressure on Indira Gandhi that's why she attacked Darbar Sahib because if she didn't, she was afraid that congress would lose a lot of votes.

Look at this to see BJP's role in Anti Sikh riots: 375047_10201246411788786_1843846100_n.jp

As for 84, before saying Sikhs were Khalistanis, think for a minute what led to the Sikhs embracing the Khalistani movement. It was only after years of unfair treatment of Sikhs by the Hindus that Sikhs lost all petience and demanded Khalistan. Sikhs were the most patriotic Indians at one point, even more than Hindus. But repeatedly being treated as second class citizens finally made Sikhs come to the realization that if they ask for their rights they are considered traitors but if they live with their head hanging low like a caged lion then they will be considered good loyal Indians. ISI/Pak army only took advantage of the situation after Darbar Sahib was attacked. But you cannot blaim ISI Pakistani army for all the things that happened from 1947-1984 which lead to the Khalistan movement in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyways, you still didn't answer my question. Why not call all those killers of Sikhs and Muslims as terrorists as well? All you did was throw a cheap comment (like a typical Indian would once he has nothing concrete left to say) exposing your true rotten Bollywood inspired mindset about Sikhs. You did nothing more than justify 2002 and beg Sikhs to forget and move on. You are all talk and can only call names. Anyone who disagrees with you is a Khalistani, anyone who raises a cry about injustice is an agent of Pakistan. Thats it! Thats all your patriotic self-esteem is build up of? How fragile! A little bit of truth was slapped on your face and you started decorating our forum with your rang-birangi rangoli LOL.

What the hell is your bloody agenda on a Sikh forum? You come here calling us drunkards, saying you don't take us seriously yet you continue to bark, justifying the massacre of thousands of innocents and asking to forget that of another thousands.

You mouth is best where it belongs, i.e. Modi's toilet paper.

Get lost!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop burning Ravan every year and causing air pollution then. He has been dead for 7000 years now, maaf kar deyo fer hun. Times, maps, languages, dressing styles, hair styles, weather patterns, all have changed. Move on and stop living 7000 years in the past.

Stop crying about Ram Mandir which was demolished 400 years ago. The Mughals are dead and gone. Their rule has been over for a very long time. Forget it and move on, stop agitating for it. Can you?

Stop telling your kids about the trains that came with butchered corpses from Pakistan in 1947, forget it, move on, and stop making movies on it. Will you?

You choose NOT to forget things that had a closure and are now buried under the mists of time, yet you expect Sikhs to forget things they saw not too long ago and is brutally stabbed in our memory as a wound that cannot be healed.

Ravan was a saint. No one ever called Ram Chandra a master of the Vedas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you cannot blaim ISI Pakistani army for all the things that happened from 1947-1984 which lead to the Khalistan movement in the first place.

Retards like this guy even ended up blaming ISI for that monkey-man creature which terrorized New Delhi in May 2001. They would jump off their balconies fearing they were attacked. One has to admit the Afghans were much braver who feared a lion like Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa, as compared to these guys. Even Bajrang Dal didn't claim he was their member!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use