Jump to content

Deep Meditation Maha Mool Mantar/gurmantar Hd Is Out..! Enjoy !


N30S1NGH
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am also going to stick my neck out and be v pedantic here, probably because of my early Taksali influence, so apologies if I offend anyone. If we listen carefully the pronunciations of Ek-O-Angkar are incorrect in the posts by both Neo and Mohkam Singh veers. I'm afraid the proper use of the 'A' sound in the HD vids and the 'O' sounds in the Jagjit Singh vid are either absent or so subtle they are barely audible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks veer for pointing it out. Yes off course from santhia aspect or intial focusing on jaap dhuni meditation aspect, this probably matters but i don't think from various other meditation aspect this matters great deal as one's surti is meant to perceive knowledge/wisdom essence/gian of Ik oankar and not focusing on dhuni or prounciation.. from meditation on gian-nirgun upasana aspect focus is not so much on dhun on shabad but its meditating/ rather abiding at the source/knowledge-one universal awareness being/chaitan paratama where dhun shabad rises from.. hope that helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks veer for pointing it out. Yes off course from santhia aspect or intial focusing on jaap dhuni meditation aspect, this probably matters but i don't think from various other meditation aspect this matters great deal as one's surti is meant to perceive knowledge/wisdom essence/gian of Ik oankar and not focusing on dhuni or prounciation.. from meditation on gian-nirgun upasana aspect focus is not so much on dhun on shabad but its meditating/ rather abiding at the source/knowledge-one universal awareness being/chaitan paratama where dhun shabad rises from.. hope that helps.

Understood VG. I'm stuck in my ways now and find it hard to move past this aspect. Having spoken to a Mahapurak they tell me to continue with shud readings even if focus takes one away from deeper meanings as been told it will come later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Understood VG. I'm stuck in my ways now and find it hard to move past this aspect. Having spoken to a Mahapurak they tell me to continue with shud readings even if focus takes one away from deeper meanings as been told it will come later.

Haan ji, i say whatever you drawn to naturally its fine thats your path as long as its not part of conditioned mind thats all. Bigger challenge for all of us is find out which portion is part of conditioned mind and which one is natural- part of inner intuiative guidance/bibek/surti... thats why senior gurmukhs recommend (to overcome that challenge) to live, practise sikhi with inner bibek/inner consciouness-chaitanta also called as surti as opposed to any mind conditioning..once we start functioning or start living with mindfulness-start practising from inner consciouness/awareness/surti everything gets revealed to us automatically spontaneously by higher power - call it satguru's inner guidance or mahapursh guidance call it your own real self ek jot saroop -same thing..main thing is seeker is now receptive-opened without any condtioning of mind or thoughts for divine to reveal itself whereas if we do actions be it any out of condioned mind then conditioned mind comes in a way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...
  • 5 months later...

Thanks for feedback penji, but as i mentioned earlier don't let semantics of pointer (akhar) confine your surti-consciousness, pointer(akhar) is meant to point towards it shabad gyan- bhramgyan not limit you to semantics of it-akhar and thats never the intention of a pointer. As Gurbani says ultimately its not akhar semantics but rather akhar gyan- bhramgyan:

ਏ ਅਖਰ ਖਿਰਿ ਜਾਹਿਗੇ ਓਇ ਅਖਰ ਇਨ ਮਹਿ ਨਾਹਿ ॥੧॥ ए अखर खिरि जाहिगे ओइ अखर इन महि नाहि ॥१॥
Ė akẖar kẖir jāhige o▫e akẖar in mėh nāhi. ||1||
These letters shall perish; they cannot describe the Imperishable Lord. ||1||

just end up saying waheguru mentally after each, so maybe is better than straight up ... it's all good

akkar likhe sehi gavaan...came to mind just then

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use