Jump to content

Casteism Eating Up Sikhism+ Matrimonial Issues


JSingh01
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jo Amrit Ko Neer Kahe, Sikh Ki Poochhe Jaat.

Kahe Gobind Singh; Nand Lal Ji, So Sikh Jampur Jaat.

 

One who refers to Amrit as just water, or asks the caste of a Sikh.

O Nand Lal, says Gobind Singh, that Sikh goes to hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ReadSikhReyatMaryada

Literally all the questions on sikh sangat are answered and fully explained in the sikh reyat maryada.
Replying to Puzzled posts, having heriditary gurdwaras does not result in anything good, if they discriminate against Caste then they simply aren't sikhs. They are just like the mahants. Whats the point in having a gurdwara if you discriminate against people on something which sikhi disagrees and is against (if you follow jath paath you aren't a sikh). A gurdwara is owned by the sikh panth not by heriditory the capital could be money wise owned but the gurdwara should be run along the lines of the SGPC (shiromani gurdwara parbandic committee ) or its not a 'gurdwara'. The best course of action would be to challgenge them or Boycott there gurdwara to force them to change.
Its quite simple, if you see a 'sikh' drinking alcohol or taking drugs or stealing, lying etc. they aren't a sikh, they are a pathith.
Many - most people i see on this website are 'Cultural sikhs' as in they dress and follow SOME of the basics of sikhi but the rest they ignore for convenience, This is increasing around the world especially in the sikh diaspora as the link between grandparents (who have lots of knowledge of sihki and punjabi and guru granth sahib ) and kids is fading so they can't be taught about sihki and punjabi which is ABOSOLUTELY required to become a gursikh, 
Replying to The person who started this thread: The gurus were fully against the caste system it is meaningless discrimination which was made by brahmins to keep themselves in power. You yourself are acknowleding that you are a manmat by asking why sikhs who USED to be of a lower  cast before they became sikhs were not chosen as gurus it was done purely on there connectedness to wahegure (wrong word cant think of atm), i suggest you read and UNDERSTAND the gurbani. There is a big difference between listening, understanding and munning (Japji sahib). If listening itself made you become one with waheguru wouldn't everyone in the villages in india become one with god from hearing the gurbani from speakers in the gurdwaras?
A youtube channel i recommend which is easy to understand (requires basic- medium fluency in punjabi there are some words which i don't understand [i am a Sikh youth in australia, but i normally watch these videos with grandparents or parents who know punjabi better]).
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTOF84os79-bv9y-mLEFvDw

He fully explains and gives background/ contextual on all of it, really easy to understand!


If you are a sikh you have no cast!! -  If a sikh engages in any jaath patth they quite simply are not a sikh
Goorth was made to prevent inbreeding!

And remember before posting question on here have a read of the Sikh Reyat Maryada! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jigsaw_Puzzled_Singh
On 3/17/2020 at 12:13 PM, puzzled said:

   and also in doaba where im from  sainis sikhs who are zamindars and of rajput origin are more dominant that jatts in some parts of doaba, try telling them 

Just Hoshiarpur. Hoshiarpur has always been famous for being the saini heartland. It was so well known that Rudyard Kipling even wrote in a Saini vegetable farmer from Hoshiarpur character in his epic story 'Kim'. 'Famous' because the soil quality in Hoshairpur is so low that it's only really suitable for vegetables like onions and potatoes etc. Leave the rest of Doaba out of it Puzzled. This is purely a Hoshiarpur thing. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use