Jump to content

Dalit Turned Sikh Forms ‘Mini Punjab’ In Bihar After Facing Rejection In Punjab


SadSingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

Are you serious?

You don't have any idea about so-called 'low-caste' Sikh are generally treated by the high and mighty???

It does not explain in the article How he was discriminated by other Sikhs.

Was he not allowed into a Gurdwara even though people from every creed, race, religion go to Gurdwarae every day all over India , or was he discriminated from a job which he would have preferential treatment due to caste quotas.

The media seems to make these blanket statements without any reason or details behind it and we do not question their meaning and follow what they say blindly like sheep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does not explain in the article How he was discriminated by other Sikhs.

Was he not allowed into a Gurdwara even though people from every creed, race, religion go to Gurdwarae every day all over India , or was he discriminated from a job which he would have preferential treatment due to caste quotas.

The media seems to make these blanket statements without any reason or details behind it and we do not question their meaning and follow what they say blindly like sheep.

Mate, I've seen enough from apnay with my own eyes to know what is reality and what is bull.

And I tell you what, the first thing closet jaat paat knobs try and do is play it all down. Just because people might be let in and out of Gurdwaras, it doesn't mean rampant snide, haughty, obnoxious, exclusionary treatment doesn't take place on a continual basis (that people don't like to face up to, in the same way people ignored the grooming issue for decades). Jeez dude, are you really that naive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mate, I've seen enough from apnay with my own eyes to know what is reality and what is bull.

And I tell you what, the first thing closet jaat paat knobs try and do is play it all down. Just because people might be let in and out of Gurdwaras, it doesn't mean rampant snide, haughty, obnoxious, exclusionary treatment doesn't take place on a continual basis (that people don't like to face up to, in the same way people ignored the grooming issue for decades). Jeez dude, are you really that naive?

Please explain these exclusionary treatments that "lower caste" Sikhs receive from "higher caste" Sikhs. Which are the higher caste Sikhs and the lower caste Sikhs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please explain these exclusionary treatments that "lower caste" Sikhs receive from "higher caste" Sikhs. Which are the higher caste Sikhs and the lower caste Sikhs?

This thing is so ugly, I don't want to talk about it. For those of us who know what goes on: isn't weird how people are oblivious?

Ranjeet01 use the internet if you're really interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thing is so ugly, I don't want to talk about it. For those of us who know what goes on: isn't weird how people are oblivious?

Ranjeet01 use the internet if you're really interested.

If you can provide examples that would be great. :)

Sikhi can't be all bad, since those high caste Sikhs provided him the board to live on their land, three square meals, paid him enough wages to send back to Bihar for him to buy land, property and money for his family. What's more he embraced Sikhi, it has empowered him to live amongst Sikhs which he has emparted with fellow Biharis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you can provide examples that would be great. :)

Sikhi can't be all bad, since those high caste Sikhs provided him the board to live on their land, three square meals, paid him enough wages to send back to Bihar for him to buy land, property and money for his family. What's more he embraced Sikhi, it has empowered him to live amongst Sikhs which he has emparted with fellow Biharis.

Bro, Sikhi is not in question, its the attitudes of certain Sikhs towards other Sikhs thats the problem. Its not a one way flow either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bro, Sikhi is not in question, its the attitudes of certain Sikhs towards other Sikhs thats the problem. Its not a one way flow either.

Perceived attitude is one thing, discrimination is another.

I think that caste is far more exaggerated issue in our community than we realise.

I asked this question to Dallysingh101, he could not answer it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you can provide examples that would be great. :)

Sikhi can't be all bad, since those high caste Sikhs provided him the board to live on their land, three square meals, paid him enough wages to send back to Bihar for him to buy land, property and money for his family. What's more he embraced Sikhi, it has empowered him to live amongst Sikhs which he has emparted with fellow Biharis.

Can you ever get in your backward, casteist mindset that their are no castes in Sikhi? So who are your so called high caste Sikhs?

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you ever get in your backward, casteist mindset that their are no castes in Sikhi? So who are your so called high caste Sikhs?

.

Singhnz

Do you have anything constructive to say instead of barking. You have made no effort in what I have said. You have no idea of the context of what is being said.

There is an underlying assumption that caste is an issue solely in particular of one group of Sikhs, one that is stereotypically shown as all puff chested and traditionally involved in farming and agriculture when it really isn't.

So I asked the question of what these examples of this discrimination that other groups of Sikhs get from this particular Sikh of which there is no answer.

I don't whether you are a born and bred Kiwi or one that came over from India on a student visa awaiting his PR but I have worked with many Kiwis and they are usually a very intelligent people and they would have had a much better understanding of what I have to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use