Jump to content

Is Being Anti Islam Racist?


Recommended Posts

Nope not at all. However the liberals of society will call you out on it and label you a racist (even though Islam goes against a lot of there stuff too). By the time these left wing loonies figure out they made a mistake it'll be too late. We as sikhs should just sit back and watch it all play out, keep your ties strong in punjab as when everything does hit the fan we can always move back. This is what the Jews are doing in countries like France

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont listen to the far left they will label anything as racist.

Bottom line is you cant be race-ist against a religion. Religion is a religion its ideology its belief and can be changed, people can convert.

Race is a race something you cant change, your born into it you have no choice to change your skin colour or racial ethnic group.

So no being anti-islam is not racist it can be called religionist or bigoted. And Islam teaches its followers to be religionist against non-muslims they are 1.6 billion in number they are majority in many area's they have no right to shout racist or religionist against anyone because they are the oppressor they are the abuser in a position of power against other religious minorities.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2

Islam is a religion not a race

Many bad ideas in islam as well like muhammad marrying aisha when she was 9

if people attack bad ideas in islam how would that make them a racist

Islam isn't a race. Being Anti-Islamic is just you not wanting Sharia Law which any sane person would want.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Further more I would say its unjust to attack muslims just for being muslims.

The biggest victims of Islam are muslims themselves. The countless dead muslims in recent wars are from the hands of other criminal muslim jihadi's who have judged those who oppose them to have become aspostes and religiously justified to be killed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Muslims and multiculturalism don't work, they have two worlds the world of the believer and world of non believer, for multiculturalism to work you have to exclude them.

Yup it seems that way from all the muslim countries we can see in the world today very few or none that embrace multiculturalism or multi-religious setup where the other religions are given equality. Islamic authorities assert themselves very arrogantly and clearly that islam is the dominant religion and to try and convert muslims to other faiths wont be tolerated however non-muslims are fair game for abuse, haraessment, attacks, murders, rapes, discrimination or conversions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Islam was just a religion in terms of praying and believing in the oneness of the creator no one has an issue.

However Islam is a political ideology guised as a religion and that it is where the issue lies.

The type of political ideology that it is espouses is expansionist and totalitarian. I think that is the problem.

Who wants live under Sharia law. Why does any muslim want to live under Sharia law let alone a Kafir.

It has a political system that has a "them" and "us" attitude where you have Dar-Ul-Harb and Dar-Ul-Islam.

It's premise begins aggressively to people that are not muslim. When they run out of non-Muslims, the proponents of this political system turns on itself.

People do not want to live under that system, people run from it. Except that some of the people who ran from the system want to replicate that system in their new host societies (why do you want to do that?)

This system is parasitic because it infects the host society where people run from it only to spread to the next place.

People instinctively understand this.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If Islam was just a religion in terms of praying and believing in the oneness of the creator no one has an issue.

However Islam is a political ideology guised as a religion and that it is where the issue lies.

The type of political ideology that it is espouses is expansionist and totalitarian. I think that is the problem.

Who wants live under Sharia law. Why does any muslim want to live under Sharia law let alone a Kafir.

It has a political system that has a "them" and "us" attitude where you have Dar-Ul-Harb and Dar-Ul-Islam.

It's premise begins aggressively to people that are not muslim. When they run out of non-Muslims, the proponents of this political system turns on itself.

People do not want to live under that system, people run from it. Except that some of the people who ran from the system want to replicate that system in their new host societies (why do you want to do that?)

This system is parasitic because it infects the host society where people run from it only to spread to the next place.

People instinctively understand this.

Thats a really good analysis, If only more people in power analysed the true nature of islam's political setup and fought tooth and nail against it just as much they fought against the nazi's ideology.

Islam is a trojan horse first it came into the lands as something strange but peaceful, then it started to groom the weak (ie vulnerable loveless girls and low iQ men and stockholm syndrome women). Then once its population had grown enough they started to demand undeserved special privileges and rights. Once they were granted and they had almost 40% population over a nation their mentally insane criminal members started to violently attack the peaceful unsuspecting non-muslim host community. The host community fought back but were held back by the liberalists and far left trying to aid the islamists unwittingly. The islamists used extreme violence and destroy the government and install their own fascist totalitarian islamist leaders and spread out their black shirt troops in every town and city in the land enforcing their sharia mullahbad dictates. And hey presto the once playful peaceful joyful progressive non-muslim nation has been transformed to a despotic islamic hellhole with limited rights for women and non-muslim communities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Shalom Sri Akal... I mean, Sat Sri Akal, fellow Sikh brothers and sisters. 😅
    • That happened to me once. I did an additional Jap Ji Sahib for a few days. It was an accident. Make amends according to your conscience, and move on.
    • There is simply no reason to do agan bhet (tribute to the fire). There are ways of repairing books. (Yeah, I know Gutka Sahib is not a mere book, but I'm just talking about the technology of binding.) I have no clue why your soul doesn't agree to do path on that Gutka Sahib. Do you think it has been sullied? Even if you wrote Gurbani on something that was ritually impure, that would make it pure: ਤਰ ਤਾਰਿ ਅਪਵਿਤ੍ਰ ਕਰਿ ਮਾਨੀਐ ਰੇ ਜੈਸੇ ਕਾਗਰਾ ਕਰਤ ਬੀਚਾਰੰ ॥ ਭਗਤਿ ਭਾਗਉਤੁ ਲਿਖੀਐ ਤਿਹ ਊਪਰੇ ਪੂਜੀਐ ਕਰਿ ਨਮਸਕਾਰੰ ॥੨॥ The palmyra palm tree is considered as impure and so are deemed its leaves to be. But if the Lord's praise be written on it, we worship it and bow before it. p1293   Similarly, Guest Komal, for whatever you think the pages of the Gutka Sahib became "impure" by falling on the ground, it is still pure. Get it out of your head. The very Gurbani you're reciting says so. This is not to say that you should throw dirt on purpose on a Gutka sahib. It is only to say you shouldn't burn a Gutka for your mistake.
    • 1. Beggars can't be choosers. I'll take what we can get. I'm actually fine with numbers.  Yeah, so many of them have no clue what Gurbani says, but as long as they, in their minds, "ਮੰਨ" Guru Granth Sahib ji, that's good enough for me. Because who am I to say I'm any better than them? ਹਉ ਅਪਰਾਧੀ ਗੁਨਹਗਾਰ ਹਉ ਬੇਮੁਖ ਮੰਦਾ॥ ਚੋਰੁ ਯਾਰੁ ਜੂਆਰਿ ਹਉ ਪਰ ਘਰਿ ਜੋਹੰਦਾ॥ I am a criminal, a sinner, evil and apostate. I am a thief, adulterer; gambler who always keeps his eye upon other's household. Vaar Bhai Gurdas ji 36, Pauri 21   2. I'm pleased to be part of a Panth which encouraged people to join it for the love of Guru Nanak ji, instead of being forced to (by various means) like the Abrahamics.   3. If you're in the company of non-practicing Sikhs, they'll generally let you do your thing (Nitnem, Reharas, whatever). It's not like you're asking "Hey, mind if I do Namaz?" Or "I'm fasting for Ramadan". You're part of the same religion, though they're not strict about it. 4. What the Mullahs do is, first they get you into their religion. Then they indoctrinate the kids into Jihad. Why can't we do the same (indoctrinate into Bhagti, not Jihad)?
    • But that's not what he was saying. He was saying that certain among us not only compromised with maryada while working for the new masters, but also -during off hours,  -after retiring from service, and -worst of all, passed on those compromises to following generations as a kind of baseline   The only true baseline for maryada is the maryada of Guru Gobind Singh ji.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use