London Sikhs Who Will You Vote For Mayor? Sadiq Khan Or Zac Goldsmith?

[genie 1,649]

So boris johnson is not going to be mayor of London for much longer and there are a few candidates to chose from but the 2 front runners backed by their parties are sadiq khan (labour party) and zac Goldsmith (conservatives).

Who would you vote for and your reasons why?

[Balkaar 1,340]

I've been quite impressed by the way Corbyn's party has reclaimed Labour's leftism and shifted away from the mongrel politics of New Labour, who betrayed the working classes and bastardized the British left by continuing Thatcher's economic policy. I've never voted in any election before, but I will this time, and I'll be voting for Sadiq Khan, because I'd like to ensure that this revitalized Labour Party is as influential as possible. Especially since two of it's most prominent figures, John Mcdonnel and Tom Watson, are both friends of our Panth and always supported us in our struggle for justice against the perpetrators of the Sikh genocide, when nobody else even cared.

[Jeevan 175]

None of the above.

My opinion Sikhs shouldn't vote Labour heavily implicated in the grooming scandals. The Labour candidate shared a platform with extremist groups.

The multi millionaire Conservative candidate recently voted for disability cuts.

I would vote UKIP and no they are not racist, that's a misconception, they are not whiter than white but a better alternative to Lib\Lab\Con. What have Labour done for the Ealing Ward which has the biggest concentration of Sikhs outside the Punjab?

[Hammertime007 508]

A muslim mayor of London In a already islamfied London cannot be good for the capital of England or non muslims.

[JagsawSingh 860]

A muslim mayor of London In a already islamfied London cannot be good for the capital of England or non muslims.

"Already Islamified London" ? Really ?

Which part of London do you live in for you to think that ?

Oh yeah....you don't do you....You live in the Birmingham area and yet you think we Londoners live an "islamified" city.

As a Londoner, let me tell you that this city is very black......very jewish....very very Hindu....extremely European.....increasingly hispanic south american and in these parts of west London very Sikh. But, unless you live in the cheap eastern part of London, it most certainly isn't even remotely 'islamified'.

[Balkaar 1,340]

A muslim mayor of London In a already islamfied London cannot be good for the capital of England or non muslims.

The imam of a mosque in Bradford issued a fatwa against Sadiq Khan because he voted in favour of gay marriage. He has received death threats from Muslims because of this. He's no Islamic toady, I'm certain.

[genie 1,649]

Sadiq khan is a muslim so he will view muslim issues more favorably than non-muslim issues. Thats the problem with voting for labour. They also were involved in the banning of 2 Sikh freedom fighting groups in 2000 when jack straw the jewish mp lumped all armed groups in anti-terror legislation before 9/11 in preparation of what was to come in america. In 2009 they were also in government when they alleged to have destroyed an important file related to british establishment and operation blue star.

Nor do they put up Sikh candidates in high asian populated area's they tend to put up feminazi white women who do jack all for ethnic and religious minorities.

As for Zac Goldsmith he is a privileged white male, the son of a jewish billionaire whose tory party helped indira gandhi's Indian government attack our holiest shrine and the establishment sided with the enemy rather than came to our peoples aid. Nor did they want the release of secret documents to the public of their partys involvement in the Sikh genocide and war crime. They still dont want the disturbing truth to come out by hide the incriminating documents under the 100year rule and shipping them off to the vaults of the foreign affairs commonwealth office.

Also check the letters and leaflets sent to Sikh households below

[Balkaar 1,340]

zacleafletsikhsedited(2).jpg

You can't compare Corbyn's labour to the New Labour of Blair and Brown genie. They are barely the same thing. Corbyn's Labour, an authentically socialist one, had no role in all that anti-terror legislature and warmongering, Corbyn was opposed to it from the first.

Take a look at this leaflet targeting the Hindu community ^ On the Sikh leaflet he talks about defending our rights, and on the Hindu leaflet he talks about welcoming a man who is the single greatest obstacle to the Sikh's acquisition of these rights! This slimy creature is sooo two-faced. Sadiq Khan on the other hand wants to ban Modi from the UK? Good. Even more of a reason for us Sikhs to vote for him and Corbyn. Mr Khan is principled, not afraid to pi55 people off by fighting for what he believes in, Goldsmith is a fawning ar5e-kisser who will say anything to ingratiate himself into peoples' good graces.

Tom Watson of the Labour Party was the one campaigning for the Conservative Government's role in the storming of Sri Harmandir Sahib to be made public, not Zac Goldsmith. The months in the run-up to this mayoral election are the first time his name has EVER been mentioned in connection with the Sikhs. There isn't a single piece of evidence in print or on the net to substantiate his LIE that he "campaigned for the documents detailing the storming of the Golden Temple to be made public".

There is no dilemma here, no choice. Not for any decent person, and not for any Sikh who loves their Panth and wants it to prosper. Khan and Corbyn want to ban our enemy Modi, who supports the Shiv Sena, VHP and the RSS, from the UK. John Mcdonnell compared the events of 1984 to the Jewish Holocaust and demanded that this outrage be given the attention it deserves, when he was basically still a political nonentity. Tom Watson, as well as spearheading the effort to reveal the full extent of the Conservatives' involvement in 84, has consistently attempted to bring the Sikh genocide before parliament, only to be ignored repeatedly. In spite of this, he never stopped. These men are all our allies.

[genie 1,649]

You can't compare Corbyn's labour to the New Labour of Blair and Brown genie. They are barely the same thing. Corbyn's Labour, an authentically socialist one, had no role in all that anti-terror legislature and warmongering, Corbyn was opposed to it from the first.

Take a look at this leaflet targeting the Hindu community ^ On the Sikh leaflet he talks about defending our rights, and on the Hindu leaflet he talks about welcoming a man who is the single greatest obstacle to the Sikh's acquisition of these rights! This slimy creature is sooo two-faced. Sadiq Khan on the other hand wants to ban Modi from the UK? Good. Even more of a reason for us Sikhs to vote for him and Corbyn. Mr Khan is principled, not afraid to pi55 people off by fighting for what he believes in, Goldsmith is a fawning ar5e-kisser who will say anything to ingratiate himself into peoples' good graces.

Tom Watson of the Labour Party was the one campaigning for the Conservative Government's role in the storming of Sri Harmandir Sahib to be made public, not Zac Goldsmith. The months in the run-up to this mayoral election are the first time his name has EVER been mentioned in connection with the Sikhs. There isn't a single piece of evidence in print or on the net to substantiate his LIE that he "campaigned for the documents detailing the storming of the Golden Temple to be made public".

There is no dilemma here, no choice. Not for any decent person, and not for any Sikh who loves their Panth and wants it to prosper. Khan and Corbyn want to ban our enemy Modi, who supports the Shiv Sena, VHP and the RSS, from the UK. John Mcdonnell compared the events of 1984 to the Jewish Holocaust and demanded that this outrage be given the attention it deserves, when he was basically still a political nonentity. Tom Watson, as well as spearheading the effort to reveal the full extent of the Conservatives' involvement in 84, has consistently attempted to bring the Sikh genocide before parliament, only to be ignored repeatedly. In spite of this, he never stopped. These men are all our allies.

I think you make a strong case for voting for labour there. If only they hadn't chosen a muslim candidate, its a huge problem for non-muslims to vote for him and thats why the tories know its better to pick on khan's islamic credentials so that they will get the votes. Khan has had some very dodgy islamo-fascist scumbags campaign for him judging by their social media feeds.

As for banning Modi I couldnt care either way. Sikhs should not be campaigning to ban Modi because thats the job of Indian muslims, let them get off their lazy greedy islamo-fascist backsides to protest against modi. Not half a brain dozen pro-pakistan Sikhs with village mentally jumping up and down sucking off their muslim oppressors at any given opportunity.

Sikhs should always either stay neutral and only fight for whats bests in the interests of our deen and kaum.

[Ranjeet01 2,312]

Interesting debate with the candidates on LBC.

As with most elections, it is a popularity contest. The Greens, Lib Dems and UKIP are there to make up the numbers.

It's going to be between Khan and Goldsmith.

Listening to the debate, I think Goldsmith will win it. He sounds more smooth, suave and polished.

I don't live in London so I have no bone on this.

[KhoonKaBadlaKhoon 778]

I think you make a strong case for voting for labour there. If only they hadn't chosen a muslim candidate, its a huge problem for non-muslims to vote for him and thats why the tories know its better to pick on khan's islamic credentials so that they will get the votes. Khan has had some very dodgy islamo-fascist scumbags campaign for him judging by their social media feeds.

As for banning Modi I couldnt care either way. Sikhs should not be campaigning to ban Modi because thats the job of Indian muslims, let them get off their lazy greedy islamo-fascist backsides to protest against modi. Not half a brain dozen pro-pakistan Sikhs with village mentally jumping up and down sucking off their muslim oppressors at any given opportunity.

Sikhs should always either stay neutral and only fight for whats bests in the interests of our deen and kaum.

Solid post. With the way some Sikhs act you'd think it was Sikhs who were victims in 2002 and not the Muslims. Lets get off of our high horses, you cannot expect any govt to shun Modi during a visit because of Sikhs. Most illogical thinking ever. Modi is not the second coming of Zakirya Khan, but nor is he a much of a friend to us, well we dont have many friends in India as it is.

[WaljinderSingh 834]

Should be whoever can show us dreams of achey din...