Jump to content

Unbelieavable?


muscleman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Your second video insults Kanye West (aka the greatest artist if our generation). I will not stand for this.

Greatest artist of our generation? Erm no, arguably thats ppl like akala, lowkey, amy winehouse, not some k@njar who chats crap about his prostitute wife's fat arse, diamonds n how he sucks off gay-z.

U shud listen to 90s rap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Best to keep it quiet yanky, i have already embarassed u previously on this forum n had u runnin away like a janani wen u couldnt give me rebuttals.

Regarding puttin the videos down, its freedom of speech, any1 can put any video up on youtube, unless it violates rules(racist/religion etc).

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh! If they truly owned society, they could easily put it down. (They don't own society at all) Also repeating the same stuff as you've already done doesn't prove anything. You already believe that Saddam Hussein shouldn't have been brought to justice by someone and making some huge excuses on why he wasn't as bad as I described. You're going to continue talking like a manmukh sharing conspiracy theories by manmukhs. (These people want to spread their own propaganda).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greatest artist of our generation? Erm no, arguably thats ppl like akala, lowkey, amy winehouse, not some k@njar who chats crap about his prostitute wife's fat arse, diamonds n how he sucks off gay-z.

U shud listen to 90s rap.

Kanye slander will not be tolerated on this forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vaheguru Ji Ka Khalsa Vaheguru Ji Ki Fateh! If they truly owned society, they could easily put it down. (They don't own society at all) Also repeating the same stuff as you've already done doesn't prove anything. You already believe that Saddam Hussein shouldn't have been brought to justice by someone and making some huge excuses on why he wasn't as bad as I described. You're going to continue talking like a manmukh sharing conspiracy theories by manmukhs. (These people want to spread their own propaganda).

Wen did i say saddam shudnt of been brought to justice u thick yank? Every1 knew he was a mass murderer, nobody, esp me aint denying that. However as i sed previously, the REASON for iraqs inavasion had nutin to do wit topplin him, it was to take control of the iraqi national bank. They even admitted the initial reason given to invade iraq...to find the WMD's, was a complete lie. IF saddam HAD WMD's, y didnt he use em on westerners? Stop with ur bakwaas, your embarassing yourself, by attemptin to put words in my mouth (patheticly), and then bein dopey by nature wen it comes to REAL world of politics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Wen did i say saddam shudnt of been brought to justice u thick yank? Every1 knew he was a mass murderer, nobody, esp me aint denying that. However as i sed previously, the REASON for iraqs inavasion had nutin to do wit topplin him, it was to take control of the iraqi national bank. They even admitted the initial reason given to invade iraq...to find the WMD's, was a complete lie. IF saddam HAD WMD's, y didnt he use em on westerners? Stop with ur bakwaas, your embarassing yourself, by attemptin to put words in my mouth (patheticly), and then bein dopey by nature wen it comes to REAL world of politics.

Since your so obsessed with conspiracy theories: I'd recommend this video from a former President of the United States Of America, on groups like the illuminati:

Also look at the official reason Saddam Hussein was executed: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_Saddam_Hussein crimes against humanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since your so obsessed with conspiracy theories: I'd recommend this video from a former President of the United States Of America, on groups like the illuminati:

Also look at the official reason Saddam Hussein was executed: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_Saddam_Hussein crimes against humanity.

Firstly...Wikipedia.......dear o dear! Thats like quoting the 'hindustan times' newspaper, wen it comes to news stories about sikhs.

Secondly, he was executed for crimes against humanity....and? AGAIN, WHERE have i denied he wasnt a mass murderer or deserved death? Wat has him bein a mass murderer got to do wit the entire nation of iraq bein illegaly invaded, and havin ALL their oil/natural resources/national bank stolen n taken over n then placin a puppet leader? Differentiate between the two lad.

Ironically u put a video up of kennedy, well he was murdered by the CIA, for bein anti-vietnam, pro-black civil rights and sympathetic to the complete end of segregation in america. He was murdered by the very same ppl ur mockin. Jus read the comments section of that video. That video, jus supports wat me, genie n jkvlondon r tryna tell u lot on this forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2

Firstly...Wikipedia.......dear o dear! Thats like quoting the 'hindustan times' newspaper, wen it comes to news stories about sikhs.

Secondly, he was executed for crimes against humanity....and? AGAIN, WHERE have i denied he wasnt a mass murderer or deserved death? Wat has him bein a mass murderer got to do wit the entire nation of iraq bein illegaly invaded, and havin ALL their oil/natural resources/national bank stolen n taken over n then placin a puppet leader? Differentiate between the two lad.

Ironically u put a video up of kennedy, well he was murdered by the CIA, for bein anti-vietnam, pro-black civil rights and sympathetic to the complete end of segregation in america. He was murdered by the very same ppl ur mockin. Jus read the comments section of that video.

Since the entire Saddam argument isn't going anywhere, all I will say to end that conservation is, "the ends justify the means", (we can end that topic). Also, I don't know how you view JFK or whatnot, but in America he's been compared to as a Martyr, (Shaheed). Many people across the spectrum believe he was right on his battle against the "New World Order" and other groups of corruption.

Also I would never quote Hindustan Times for Sikh stuff. They called the 1978 Shaheeds as Fanatics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the entire Saddam argument isn't going anywhere, all I will say to end that conservation is, "the ends justify the means", (we can end that topic). Also, I don't know how you view JFK or whatnot, but in America he's been compared to as a Martyr, (Shaheed). Many people across the spectrum believe he was right on his battle against the "New World Order" and other groups of corruption.

Also I would never quote Hindustan Times for Sikh stuff. They called the 1978 Shaheeds as Fanatics.

JFK in my opinion was a great man, 1 of the very few politicians, esp at his high position, of president, who was deemed worthy of his role. The fact that he wanted to make genuine changes, which was complete opposite to wat the 13 bloodlines/secret societies wanted, and challenged them, gets respect from any1. Sadly politicians r few and very far between. The CIA assassinated him, martin luther king, malcolm x, invaded vietnam to steal the heroin from there, under the false pretence of "protectin" s.vietnamese, all in the space of a few yrs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

truth is the way we should look at politicians of the modern age is amoral/immoral rulers and follow Guru Pita ji 's advice and not trust their words . My key phrase is 'who benefits from this?' and thinking on it, it becomes clear following the money leads to the culprits and the people who are destroying this world's sukh shanti

As for SIlverstein he made 4.9 billion out of the attack , this was capped he originally asked for 11 billion considering he only paid around 120 million for the buildings he minted it . None of the insurance dudes will shout fraud because it will expose the government complicity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is nothing wrong with starched pagg. The Guru is omniscient (all-knowing). You think he doesn't know our intentions? If somebody wears a starched pagg but still respects it as a crown then whats wrong with that? People think that starch automatically makes people lose their respect for their pagg but thats just false.  And dont make this a caste thing I’m Rajput Jatt sikh (not an ounce of Tarkhan or anything else) and we all starch our INDIAN style punjabi paggs (patiala shahi), but respect them as our crowns and our literal lives. A respected starch pagg is better by far than a freshly tied one which people just disrespect. And people forget that these are not ready made or pre-tied turbans. You still tie them initially but just of course not as frequently. What’s wrong with that?  When your relationship is that strong with the Guru then you know what he means. Speak to him directly, explain why and ask him if it’s okay. Btw I know people who dont starch their turbans (all punjabi/morni style btw) and they just wear it again the next day without tying it if they have toed it really nicely the day before. 😂 You cant really even tell who had tied it and who just wore it again without starch. At least we’re open about it. Bhul chuk maaf    
    • Its called a “fifty” becuase when Singhs were fighting in the British army, they would recieve an 8 metre pagg, with a cour four base, because the base layer was half (50%) of the main turban, it’s called a fifty. The practise of tying a keski under your main one is now seen as pretty weird (except for a patka), but the small coloured strip inder the pagg is still used as a fashion statement since its pretty visually appealing. And so, people now just tie a small little “kung-fu strip” sort of thing under their pagg to imitate that effect.
    • Found how to do it. For anybody else wondering, heres how. No one even helped me btw. So much for Guru Ji’s lhalsa always ready to help (and having their Singhs’ backs smh). (Notes: Aim to do this on a hot summer’s day, and dedicate a full day to this, since you only have to do this once every 4 months at least (normally the turban will stay in shape until you wish to untie it and physically pull it open again). This helps it to dry faster, since you have to starch it, HALF DRY IT, pooni it, tie it and then wear it for around four hours for the rest of it to dry, all in the same day. It’s a one day process but it serves you for months). This works for both the UK/Kenyan style (starch is best for this style) as well as the normal Punjabi paghs (such as Patiala shahi, wattan wali and morni paghs). Not sure about dumallas though. Probably not . Pagg Starch: 1) Boil 6 cups of water in a saucepan on low heat (always low heat) 2) Seperately dissolve 4 tablespoons of maida (all purpose flower) with a little water until it is 100% smooth.  You could also use rice or corn starch. Add more water if it is not a smooth liquid 3) Once completely smooth, pour this mixture through a strainer (to make it even smoother) into the boiling water. 4) Now continuously stir it until it goes completely see through. Keep on stirring it on the low heat until it goes totally transparent (it can take a little while to cook, but the pagg will last you for months!) It will at become a thick paste first, but keep stirring until it becomes see through and thinner.    5) Once it’s transparent, pour the starch (again through a strainer) into a big enough, clean bucket to cool down. 6) Once cool, take a clean, dry turban and completely and mix it in with the starch for around 5 minutes. Make sure that it is all evenly and completely soaked and wet with the starch. (Most people use mal-mal material, but I use full voile and I have used Rubia too. They’re all fine. Maybe use Rubin for smaller turbans and mal mal for larger ones) 7) Leave it out in the sun to HALF DRY ONLY!!!!!!! (Don’t ever let your starched turban fully dry before you tie it. If you do, then you will have to spray/ sprinkle water on it which will weaken the starch and ruin the turban) ONLY HALF DRY THE TURBAN IN THE SUN!!! 😎 Once HALF DRY ONLY take the now semi damp turban, and fold/pooni and then tie it like normal (straight on your head, with no base layer such as a Keski or patka underneath). Leave it on your head for around 4 hours just to fully dry and it will be ready and set for months now. Like I said, do try to tie your dastar every day, but if you can’t or really don’t want to, I hope this helps! Like I said this works on both the traditional Punjabi/Indian style paggs, and the more recent UK/Kenyan style paggs. It does for my morni pagg, but the first larr slips up in to the pagg. This is normal dw. Wjkk, Wjkf
    • I guess easier ways of learning have taken precedence. There are so many Youtube channels and podcasts available that people are more ready to listen for knowledge at their own leisure. There are so many great kathas available online that take months to listen, so that people may not really get the time to come here and write.
    • *Bump The current conflict (w/ Iran getting involved) is being orchestrated by a 3rd party in my opinion. We all are going to blame the Jewish community (how they run the banks, how they are brutal and etc.) but they have a point in this conflict.  As soon as people start finding about the truth that's when the real movement will begin. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use