Jump to content

How Would Sita or Draupadi Have Filed Harassment Cases Today?


singhbj singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, jkvlondon said:

Guru ji consider Drupadi's bhagati her saving grace ... I agree the whole dharma is skewed in the opposite direction to which it started off . India was a nation of Devi worshippers not Devte . Even our Bengali friend from uni goes back home to join in the Devi ' Kali' pooja . The Northern people brought in an era of dev worship by creating heroes out of historical characters with dubious ethics .

iirc most of the Veds and texts that protray Vishnu as the supreme lord came about in the 11th century. The Devi Markande Puranas and such all predate it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jacfsing2
2 hours ago, Kira said:

To be fair, I still don't get why Sita stepped out of the Line that Lakshman drew. A random passerby in the middle of the jungle comes and alarm bells didn't ring? 

What this has to do with her treatment I don't know, (people despite being Sikh still having this thinking on keeping women as 2nd class citizens), also Ram is a disgrace to his descendants, (the legendary Sodhis and Bedis), for kicking Sita out of the home because a few people in his kingdom suggested she was bad; and Ram also killed a Dalit for doing Bhagti. Draupadi was just forced to be shared by that <banned word filter activated> piece of Arjun and was equally abused by her mother-in-law, and all of her "husbands", and how they sold her to their cousins to rape; and all this happened near Punjab; which would later be known by the ones who freed women from Abdali. Ram and Arjun both would be terrible sh*thole excuses for husbands: if I heard my any female relative of mine would be going into their abusive houses; I'd not only cut the Rishta, but warn other people, maybe give Ram a few ways to learn not to mess with Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Gobind Singh's kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Harleen

It seems that u guys are making fun of old avatars. Plz be respectful to them as they were the avatars of their time

there are lots of avatars(mentioned in our gurbani)

1. Guru avtar: like our gurus who come to make people more bhagati side

2.  Nit avatar: also called brahmgianis or mahapurkhs etc who come and go on earth and take lakhs of paapis with them to sachkhand by updesh

3. Namit avatar:  like sri ram and sri krishna, God sent them for some specific namit( motive)

 

why sita steeped the line

why was ravan not married to sita

etc these are the questions u guys are commenting above, thats how God made the story

 

ravan had to be killed, thats namit of sri ram, ravan was a good boy( as he didn't forced sita) but on the other side he was merciless man 1000000 times more paapi than mr.hitler

 

DO NOT MAKE FUN IF ANY PURATAN AVATAR, they were sent by God

 

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guru Nanak Dev Ji presides over Kaal Yug.

Bhagwan Krishan Ji presided over Dwapar Yug.

Siri Raam Chandra Ji presided over Tratar Yug.

Bhavan Avatar presided over Sat Yug.

 

Those with little knowledge will spew disrespect from their mouths under the guise that they are, O' such true gursikhs, but will regret their actions for many  many lifetimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Bundha said:

Guru Nanak Dev Ji presides over Kaal Yug.

Bhagwan Krishan Ji presided over Dwapar Yug.

Siri Raam Chandra Ji presided over Tratar Yug.

Bhavan Avatar presided over Sat Yug.

 

Those with little knowledge will spew disrespect from their mouths under the guise that they are, O' such true gursikhs, but will regret their actions for many  many lifetimes.

Bhavan  avtar , haven't heard much about Him any recommended sites to find out more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bundha said:

Guru Nanak Dev Ji presides over Kaal Yug.

Bhagwan Krishan Ji presided over Dwapar Yug.

Siri Raam Chandra Ji presided over Tratar Yug.

Bhavan Avatar presided over Sat Yug.

 

Those with little knowledge will spew disrespect from their mouths under the guise that they are, O' such true gursikhs, but will regret their actions for many  many lifetimes.

If they resided over the various Yugs then they were perfect and worthy of total praise. Yet Gurbani constantly criticises them. They fell to ego and their desires, while I agree that this thread is definitely in bad taste the True Satguru of all the ages was Akaal himself. All of these avtars died and faced death. There are millions like them.  Gurbani calls them insects, saying they resided over a Yug because they displayed their supernatural powers and performed great feats isn't 100% accurate. They came and did their jobs but at the same time they added to the deterioration of the age too. Minus Guru Nanak Dev Ji of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gurbani criticizes them, Guru Ji criticizes them. What avasta, what tapasia, what naam simran do we have that we feel we can criticize them?

 

Please go ahead, bad mouth them to your hearts content. You think your Guru will be pleased with you? He tells you to see Him in all, and these were His avatars , sent by Him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bundha said:

Gurbani criticizes them, Guru Ji criticizes them. What avasta, what tapasia, what naam simran do we have that we feel we can criticize them?

 

So we should stop reading Batichar Natek then? Should we stop reading Akal Ustat, both where they call them insects?  You do that. While you are there go through SGGSJ and start cutting out the stuff which criticises them.

8 minutes ago, Bundha said:

 

Please go ahead, bad mouth them to your hearts content. You think your Guru will be pleased with you? He tells you to see Him in all, and these were His avatars , sent by Him.

Badmouthing them would be if I called them swear words. If I said they were deluded in maya, that isn't me badmouthing them. That's me speaking from Gurbani. What you're telling me to do is ignore the Gurbani that speaks against them because its naughty for you. T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use