Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Kira said:

I've asked you to explain to me how someone can be a Sikh of Guru Nanak but also call him a false prophet, how someone can consider the Quran the sole authority of God but also say that Gurbani is the same lmao. Rather than posting 1 sentence answers, maybe explain it a bit? 

Well for a start it would be difficult for Baba farid ji to call guru nanak dev ji a false prophet since he lived about 300 years before him but rather don't you think it's important that guru sahibs did not call him a apostate? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Kira said:

My logic is fine. If you think you can recite the oath to Muhammad and still be a Sikh then please explain to me how? The very oath says any other religion is false..by reciting it you say Sikhism and Guru Nanak Dev Ji are false. So tell me how someone can be a Sikh of Guru Nanak and a follower of Muhammad. Tell me how a reciter of the Quran which considers itself the ONLY authority from God also sit there and say Gurbani is the same. That's called Blasphemy is Islam. So no. try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Do I really need to explain.. Try mool mantar.. I mean this is a Sikh forum.. Have you heard of it? 

That alone speaks volumes of your laziness, the argument that God is beyond Duality can be applied to everything and anyone. The fake Babas that roam India can use the same argument "I can be a Sikh of Guru Nanak Dev and also go to these people" The Aztecs sacrificed humans to gods "oh its ok God is beyond Duality, I can be a Sikh as well" Do you get the small flaw? 

I asked you and I'll repeat since it seems forming cohesive thoughts is something you dislike. How can someone who sits there reciting the Quran, reciting the Kalima and then say "I'm a Sikh"  still be both a muslim and a Sikh. You can't swear oaths to 2 sovereigns and say you belong to both. 

9 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Well for a start it would be difficult for Baba farid ji to call guru nanak dev ji a false prophet since he lived about 300 years before him but rather don't you think it's important that guru sahibs did not call him a apostate? 

We just established he wasn't a Muslim, you even admitted it. If Farid Ji was a muslim at the start of his life (most likely yes) then yes he did believe anyone after Muhammed would be an apostate. However Farid Ji changed and became enlightened so obviously he would no longer be restricted by that narrow myopic viewpoint.  The end game was He ended up one with God through Gurbani (a small portion of it).

 

Obviously he didn't. That twisted logic is like saying when people joined Guru Nanak Dev Ji and became Sikhs, we should still consider them Hindus/Muslims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kira said:

That alone speaks volumes of your laziness, the argument that God is beyond Duality can be applied to everything and anyone. The fake Babas that roam India can use the same argument "I can be a Sikh of Guru Nanak Dev and also go to these people" The Aztecs sacrificed humans to gods "oh its ok God is beyond Duality, I can be a Sikh as well" Do you get the small flaw? 

I asked you and I'll repeat since it seems forming cohesive thoughts is something you dislike. How can someone who sits there reciting the Quran, reciting the Kalima and then say "I'm a Sikh"  still be both a muslim and a Sikh. You can't swear oaths to 2 sovereigns and say you belong to both. 

We just established he wasn't a Muslim, you even admitted it. If Farid Ji was a muslim at the start of his life (most likely yes) then yes he did believe anyone after Muhammed would be an apostate. However Farid Ji changed and became enlightened so obviously he would no longer be restricted by that narrow myopic viewpoint. Obviously he didn't. That twisted logic is like saying when people joined Guru Nanak Dev Ji and became Sikhs, we should still consider them Hindus/Muslims.

Oh dear.. Nuff said 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Kira said:

That alone speaks volumes of your laziness, the argument that God is beyond Duality can be applied to everything and anyone. The fake Babas that roam India can use the same argument "I can be a Sikh of Guru Nanak Dev and also go to these people" The Aztecs sacrificed humans to gods "oh its ok God is beyond Duality, I can be a Sikh as well" Do you get the small flaw? 

I asked you and I'll repeat since it seems forming cohesive thoughts is something you dislike. How can someone who sits there reciting the Quran, reciting the Kalima and then say "I'm a Sikh"  still be both a muslim and a Sikh. You can't swear oaths to 2 sovereigns and say you belong to both. 

We just established he wasn't a Muslim, you even admitted it. If Farid Ji was a muslim at the start of his life (most likely yes) then yes he did believe anyone after Muhammed would be an apostate. However Farid Ji changed and became enlightened so obviously he would no longer be restricted by that narrow myopic viewpoint.  The end game was He ended up one with God through Gurbani (a small portion of it).

 

Obviously he didn't. That twisted logic is like saying when people joined Guru Nanak Dev Ji and became Sikhs, we should still consider them Hindus/Muslims.

 

He who swears to me on the Koran
Ought not to have killed or imprisoned my men. 

Guru gobind Singh ji clearly respected those of true faith 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Preeet said:

Vaheguru ji Ka Khalsa
Vaheguru ji Ki Fateh ji

I think that our Sri Guru Sahib ji`s are above the titles of ``prophethood``.. For instance, I`ve heard Muslims say that even Muhhamad ji has made mistakes, and yet is a prophet.. So by that logic I think calling my Satguru ji a ``prophet`` would be considered odd because Satguru jis do not make mistakes.

Satgurus always were clear that they were not prophets, that it was revelation through gian.. They lived amongst us just as SGGS ji does today 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

 

He who swears to me on the Koran
Ought not to have killed or imprisoned my men. 

Guru gobind Singh ji clearly respected those of true faith 

There's a difference between respect and thinking its right. Guru Gobind Singh Ji respected various Hindus and Muslims, that suddenly didn't make him say that someone could be a Sikh and a Muslim/Hindu at the same time. That quote is about anyone who takes false oaths, Guru Sahib told his Sikhs not to trust anyone like that anyways. 

 

So once again I've asked you to provide a logical way in how someone can adhere to Islam but also be a follower of Guru Nanak Dev Ji How can someone proclaim the Quran is the only revelation of God but also then turn around and say "yup Gurbani is the same too" 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kira said:

There's a difference between respect and thinking its right. Guru Gobind Singh Ji respected various Hindus and Muslims, that suddenly didn't make him say that someone could be a Sikh and a Muslim at the same time. That quote is about anyone who takes false oaths, Guru Sahib told his Sikhs not to trust anyone like that anyways. 

 

So once again I've asked you to provide a logical way in how someone can adhere to Islam but also be a follower of Guru Nanak Dev Ji How can someone proclaim the Quran is the only revelation of God but also then turn around and say "yup Gurbani is the same too" 

 

If guru nanak dev ji could wear a chadar with inscriptions of the Quran yet also chastise those who abused the authority of the Quran for there own means... If you believe akaal is one (which as someone who proclaims to be a Sikh) it's very easy to move beyond the politics of religion... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Kira said:

There's a difference between respect and thinking its right. Guru Gobind Singh Ji respected various Hindus and Muslims, that suddenly didn't make him say that someone could be a Sikh and a Muslim at the same time. That quote is about anyone who takes false oaths, Guru Sahib told his Sikhs not to trust anyone like that anyways. 

 

So once again I've asked you to provide a logical way in how someone can adhere to Islam but also be a follower of Guru Nanak Dev Ji How can someone proclaim the Quran is the only revelation of God but also then turn around and say "yup Gurbani is the same too" 

 

Someone who is a true Muslim, true Christian, true 'sikh' doesn't get lost in communalism 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There is nothing wrong with starched pagg. The Guru is omniscient (all-knowing). You think he doesn't know our intentions? If somebody wears a starched pagg but still respects it as a crown then whats wrong with that? People think that starch automatically makes people lose their respect for their pagg but thats just false.  And dont make this a caste thing I’m Rajput Jatt sikh (not an ounce of Tarkhan or anything else) and we all starch our INDIAN style punjabi paggs (patiala shahi), but respect them as our crowns and our literal lives. A respected starch pagg is better by far than a freshly tied one which people just disrespect. And people forget that these are not ready made or pre-tied turbans. You still tie them initially but just of course not as frequently. What’s wrong with that?  When your relationship is that strong with the Guru then you know what he means. Speak to him directly, explain why and ask him if it’s okay. Btw I know people who dont starch their turbans (all punjabi/morni style btw) and they just wear it again the next day without tying it if they have toed it really nicely the day before. 😂 You cant really even tell who had tied it and who just wore it again without starch. At least we’re open about it. Bhul chuk maaf    
    • Its called a “fifty” becuase when Singhs were fighting in the British army, they would recieve an 8 metre pagg, with a cour four base, because the base layer was half (50%) of the main turban, it’s called a fifty. The practise of tying a keski under your main one is now seen as pretty weird (except for a patka), but the small coloured strip inder the pagg is still used as a fashion statement since its pretty visually appealing. And so, people now just tie a small little “kung-fu strip” sort of thing under their pagg to imitate that effect.
    • Found how to do it. For anybody else wondering, heres how. No one even helped me btw. So much for Guru Ji’s lhalsa always ready to help (and having their Singhs’ backs smh). (Notes: Aim to do this on a hot summer’s day, and dedicate a full day to this, since you only have to do this once every 4 months at least (normally the turban will stay in shape until you wish to untie it and physically pull it open again). This helps it to dry faster, since you have to starch it, HALF DRY IT, pooni it, tie it and then wear it for around four hours for the rest of it to dry, all in the same day. It’s a one day process but it serves you for months). This works for both the UK/Kenyan style (starch is best for this style) as well as the normal Punjabi paghs (such as Patiala shahi, wattan wali and morni paghs). Not sure about dumallas though. Probably not . Pagg Starch: 1) Boil 6 cups of water in a saucepan on low heat (always low heat) 2) Seperately dissolve 4 tablespoons of maida (all purpose flower) with a little water until it is 100% smooth.  You could also use rice or corn starch. Add more water if it is not a smooth liquid 3) Once completely smooth, pour this mixture through a strainer (to make it even smoother) into the boiling water. 4) Now continuously stir it until it goes completely see through. Keep on stirring it on the low heat until it goes totally transparent (it can take a little while to cook, but the pagg will last you for months!) It will at become a thick paste first, but keep stirring until it becomes see through and thinner.    5) Once it’s transparent, pour the starch (again through a strainer) into a big enough, clean bucket to cool down. 6) Once cool, take a clean, dry turban and completely and mix it in with the starch for around 5 minutes. Make sure that it is all evenly and completely soaked and wet with the starch. (Most people use mal-mal material, but I use full voile and I have used Rubia too. They’re all fine. Maybe use Rubin for smaller turbans and mal mal for larger ones) 7) Leave it out in the sun to HALF DRY ONLY!!!!!!! (Don’t ever let your starched turban fully dry before you tie it. If you do, then you will have to spray/ sprinkle water on it which will weaken the starch and ruin the turban) ONLY HALF DRY THE TURBAN IN THE SUN!!! 😎 Once HALF DRY ONLY take the now semi damp turban, and fold/pooni and then tie it like normal (straight on your head, with no base layer such as a Keski or patka underneath). Leave it on your head for around 4 hours just to fully dry and it will be ready and set for months now. Like I said, do try to tie your dastar every day, but if you can’t or really don’t want to, I hope this helps! Like I said this works on both the traditional Punjabi/Indian style paggs, and the more recent UK/Kenyan style paggs. It does for my morni pagg, but the first larr slips up in to the pagg. This is normal dw. Wjkk, Wjkf
    • I guess easier ways of learning have taken precedence. There are so many Youtube channels and podcasts available that people are more ready to listen for knowledge at their own leisure. There are so many great kathas available online that take months to listen, so that people may not really get the time to come here and write.
    • *Bump The current conflict (w/ Iran getting involved) is being orchestrated by a 3rd party in my opinion. We all are going to blame the Jewish community (how they run the banks, how they are brutal and etc.) but they have a point in this conflict.  As soon as people start finding about the truth that's when the real movement will begin. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use