Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not been a fan of or ever agreed with the views of shockjock katie hopkins but her recent articles about muslim grooming gangs and islamic terrorism/ mass immigration has really summed up the mood of the UK fed up with state of things. The same upper calss elites and politicians that are now being protected have for decades allowed mass muslim immigration into the country and created the conditions for these kinda incidents to occur have left the rest of the population to suffer the consequences.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4539242/KATIE-HOPKINS-ll-protect-kids-terror.html

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, genie said:

I'm not been a fan of or ever agreed with the views of shockjock katie hopkins but her recent articles about muslim grooming gangs and islamic terrorism/ mass immigration has really summed up the mood of the UK fed up with state of things. The same upper calss elites and politicians that are now being protected have for decades allowed mass muslim immigration into the country and created the conditions for these kinda incidents to occur have left the rest of the population to suffer the consequences.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4539242/KATIE-HOPKINS-ll-protect-kids-terror.html

Ah, yes, indeed the elites who have imported these jihadis do not live in Manchester or Birmingham or Tower Hamlets. They live in the tony areas of London and a few other places.

Angela Merkel will not have to put up with the problems caused by importing a million "refugees" (only a few are actually from Syria) per year.

President Obama just bought a residence in a very exclusive California community.

Katy Perry, a singer, said she believes open borders: “Whatever we say behind people’s backs, the Internet can be a little bit ruthless as far as fan bases go but I think that the greatest thing we can do is just unite and love on each other,” Perry said, adding, “No barriers, no borders, we all just need to co-exist.”

But ... she has a 10-foot wall around her house! Here's a pic:

Katy-Perry-wall-1.jpg

Walls for me, but not for thee.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

What she says is correct, but she's doing it for the wrong reasons. I agree with her, yet that doesn't change the fact that she's an opportunist. It's a strange situation for someone who understands the games being played on both sides.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Ah, yes, indeed the elites who have imported these jihadis do not live in Manchester or Birmingham or Tower Hamlets. They live in the tony areas of London and a few other places.

Angela Merkel will not have to put up with the problems caused by importing a million "refugees" (only a few are actually from Syria) per year.

President Obama just bought a residence in a very exclusive California community.

Katy Perry, a singer, said she believes open borders: “Whatever we say behind people’s backs, the Internet can be a little bit ruthless as far as fan bases go but I think that the greatest thing we can do is just unite and love on each other,” Perry said, adding, “No barriers, no borders, we all just need to co-exist.”

But ... she has a 10-foot wall around her house! Here's a pic:

Katy-Perry-wall-1.jpg

Walls for me, but not for thee.

Yes its disgusting, disgraceful and disrespectful against working class communities who have to live with these problems and suffer the consequences of wrong polices.

Similarly we have cucked leftist liberal Sikh and atheist punjabi's living in the non-working class suburbs who advocate for muslim rape grooming gangs, who advocate a sarbat da bhalla type approach then wonder why their daughters and sisters are being groomed by non-sikhs and converted. They do not live in the real world they live in towns/cities away from huge muslim populations flooded by mass muslim immigration. Those working class Sikhs and punjabi's who have to live with muslim communities know what the real situation is. These liberals need to ask afghan sikhs, kashmiri sikhs, pakistani sikhs, utter pardesh sikhs what its like to live in a muslim majority area.

These kinda politicians and liberal celebrates who call for mass immigration and in particular muslim immigration need to be forced to live within the communities that they make others suffer to live in.

The rich celebrities or "elitist" people remind me of what happened before the french revolution when the king of france was living in luxury while the poor working peasant class population were suffering hardship. The queen of france is to have remarked "if they are hungry let them eat cake" this slogan was used by the anti-monarchy propagandists and it led to the blood filled french revolution which tore down the monarchy and had the privileged royal family and other elitist executed by the revolutionaries.

I think the conditions for a violent revolution in western countries are being created for such an event that will maybe overthrow the corruption of the system. If these politicians do not read the warning signs and discontentment of the working class masses then the price we all will have to pay could be very high.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2

There seems to be this problem among whites,(mostly Anglos, not much non-Angols) and that is they are trying to find culture intensely among other people without finding their own culture, whereas people around mainstream Europe will maintain their cultures and traditions better than Anglos, Agnlos almost exclusively try finding their cultural satisfaction in other cultures, this leads to a Ghulami complex, (our own people are dealing with this, especially being ashamed to call themselves Punjabi or Khalistani over Indian in India).

The cultures they would try going towards is Black people culture, Islamic culture, Subcontinental culture, Oriental culture, Other European cultures, or even Tribal people culture. It's good for them to keep an open-mind; however, this Ghulami complex, (which I wish on no one), only hurts them mentally, (they lost their Pagan Anglo roots and are now losing their faith in Anglicanism, so they can't unite religiously). Cultures could reasonably mix, but when this leads to your own people's destruction, (Anglos), or other groups suffering, (us), then you are not a humanist, you are evil.

Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, jkvlondon said:

She's a hardcore provocateur. She knew the connotations of the "final solution" phrase. Even kids of secondary school age realise what it means. I think she was attempting to push the limits, and see how far she could take things in the midst of the outrage at the attack in Manchester.

Funnily enough, by sacking her she'll be seen as someone who has had her freedom of speech curtailed. This will probably make her more popular. I fully expect her to move to the States, and get a job with Fox News, because I don't think anyone in the UK will employ her now. 

She makes a number of salient points at times, but the hysteria around her personality and the doubts around her motivations for discussing certain issues is that those discussion points she raises aren't taken seriously. It becomes a bit of a joke and ultimately damages the cause she supposedly represents.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jkvlondon said:

I wouldn't say jews per say but a certain rich elite amoung the jews certainly have great sway in politics, media, banking and other industries. These "elitists" live in spacious green expensive area's so they dont see the problems islamic ideology and huge numbers of muslim demographics is causing in problem area's.

Katie has always been outspoken and on the far right of politics. I was surprised she even got her own radio show on LBC so I guess it was a bonus for her I'm sure she will be back on another platform this time more free to say what she wants to say especially if she moves to America then she will be protected under the American constitution to say what she really thinks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

She's a hardcore provocateur. She knew the connotations of the "final solution" phrase. Even kids of secondary school age realise what it means. I think she was attempting to push the limits, and see how far she could take things in the midst of the outrage at the attack in Manchester.

Funnily enough, by sacking her she'll be seen as someone who has had her freedom of speech curtailed. This will probably make her more popular. I fully expect her to move to the States, and get a job with Fox News, because I don't think anyone in the UK will employ her now. 

She makes a number of salient points at times, but the hysteria around her personality and the doubts around her motivations for discussing certain issues is that those discussion points she raises aren't taken seriously. It becomes a bit of a joke and ultimately damages the cause she supposedly represents.

Yes that's what I was thinking she will definitely move to the united states now. Its surprising that these elites don't see the writing on the walls. They either cant see, or chose not wont see, or know and can see fully the violent long term future for the western nations with Islamic take over knocking on its door.

Bit like the brahmin hindu's and hindu kings who saw the islamic hordes coming for india and instead of uniting and fighting them they converted to islam to save themselves and draw alliances against other hindu kingdoms by aiding the invader. The western white elites of today are not too different from the past cowardly hindu kings and brahminwad priestly class of india.

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, genie said:

Yes that's what I was thinking she will definitely move to the united states now. Its surprising that these elites don't see the writing on the walls. They either cant see, or chose not wont see, or know and can see fully the violent long term future for the western nations with Islamic take over knocking on its door.

Bit like the brahmin hindu's and hindu kings who saw the islamic hordes coming for india and instead of uniting and fighting them they converted to islam to save themselves and draw alliances against other hindu kingdoms by aiding the invader. The western white elites of today are not too different from the past cowardly hindu kings and brahminwad priestly class of india.

All of what we're witnessing currently can be directly traced to the re-ordering get of the world post WW2. The desire to prevent the rise of another Hitler will ironically lead to the rise of another Hitler. The West hitched its wagon to liberalism, which in itself is not a problem, but the particularly virulent strand of extreme liberalism that's seized Europe and the States in recent times - most importantly, the ideology that is firmly entrenched in the minds of the people who are in positions to shape society - will lead to some pretty unfortunate circumstances that will end in blood being spilled on the streets on a regular basis. Whether those in positions of power genuinely believe in the values they're espousing is up for debate. The foot soldiers in the media who form public opinion and the educated classes most likely are true believers, but the top 1% who run things are playing a devilish game of chess. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

All of what we're witnessing currently can be directly traced to the re-ordering get of the world post WW2. The desire to prevent the rise of another Hitler will ironically lead to the rise of another Hitler. The West hitched its wagon to liberalism, which in itself is not a problem, but the particularly virulent strand of extreme liberalism that's seized Europe and the States in recent times - most importantly, the ideology that is firmly entrenched in the minds of the people who are in positions to shape society - will lead to some pretty unfortunate circumstances that will end in blood being spilled on the streets on a regular basis. Whether those in positions of power genuinely believe in the values they're espousing is up for debate. The foot soldiers in the media who form public opinion and the educated classes most likely are true believers, but the top 1% who run things are playing a devilish game of chess. 

Yes this extreme form of liberalism and far left ideology in particular has created the environment of social deprecation for Islam to breed like bacteria or cancer in places where once right wing traditional family units and policies made communitys strong against many social ills. They have shouted down and criminalised people who speak out against Islam who once protected western and democratic society's social infrastructure.

Also in the west we are witnessing many non-muslim youths and in particular men being vulnerable to grooming to Islam with unaffordable homes with rising house and rent prices, rising knife/gun gang crime, rising living costs, rising feminism and sexism against men, rising cases of female drunk culture, rising single parent families and divorce rates,etc. A complete social break down leading to people looking for a way out of either life by becoming a muslim offering an alternative to their current living standards and life and they further get radicalised if they become criminalized by the system with new laws being made by feminists so they become women hating extremist jihadi's like the manchester nutter or a right wing white nationalist extremists or taking their own lives in many cases having had enough with the pressures of life.

I also find it scandalous the the british state is not looking after their ex-soldiers who fought for its wars aboard. Many of them have been left homeless and many have converted to Islam with a huge grudge against the british state and society. These people have skills in armed warfare to which they will and have turned against Brittan and wars aboard fighting for jihadi causes.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tommy robinson is a top lad.

I was skeptical of tommy robinson and his motives when he formed EDL years ago but over the years I have learn't watching his videos how his friends growing up in luton council estates some of his close mates from the white working class background like himself turned to extremist Islam and how muslim grooming rape gangs were targeting his cousin sisters and other women in his community, muslim extremists preaching against British society and troops and thus eventually making him take a stand and the become the way he is now.

An English activist against Islamification of the UK.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They are all in it together. That's how they make it a culture, hence 'systemic'. The football fan types just articulate what the more clever, devious types up top believe and promote on the sly. The working class guys express their thoughts openly. So whilst a racist manager/director might deviously make an ethnic's life difficult at work through selectively handing him/her the most difficult work, and set them up to fail. The lower end ar5eholes will be the ones who will be implementing this plan and directly creating a toxic environment for the targeted people.  And they routinely turn a blind eye to racism, even if they don't actively participate. Explaining it away as 'banter'.  
    • I don't think you have any independent thoughts. You just seem to parrot what a racist white boy would want you to say, to the point of even adopting their lexicon to frame your 'arguments', like you are one of their chumchay spokesmen. I mean this seriously, not trying to offend you. What you're doing is like what Priti Patel does, but on a lower level.  I don't get what you are saying here? 
    • 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
    • I am sure theres many sikh videos of weddings. Look at rainsbai weddings. Or akj weddings.        There is milni. As the girls side of the family is in charge of the venue. They get their earlier and prepare breakfast langar ( cha pakore etc). Then when the groom and his family come over. They meet each other outside the gurudwara in the parking lot. Ideally the girls family should be doing kirtan with vaja dholki of Aye Mil Gurshikh... as they welcome the grooms family. but if noone from the girls family is a musician, the two families can just greet each other with fateh. Then each of the relatives are introduced to their contrapart. The father meet the father in law. They can say fateh and give sarope to each other. Then the mothers, brothers, uncles, aunts. Then the grooms party is invited to eat langar ( i think they do this before matha teking and as they are sangat, they are allowed to eat first...i think) After langar, groom and his family go matha tek. The groom sits in front of the sangat where they do matha tek.  Then bride walks in. Matha teks, sits next to groom. The palla ardaas is done. Then the shabad about Pallai taindai laagee (or is shabad done before?) And then lavaan etc. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use