salute to the lion shaheed sant bhindranwale and other mahan sikh shaheeds of 1984 who fought the tyranny of the Indian establishment

[genie]

Approx 250 Sikh dharam fauji's who vowed to fight to the death with their sikh brothers in arms with just their turbans and clothes for armour and lightly armed defending the darbar sahib golden temple vs 100,000 enemy brahminwad neo-mughul Indian troops with sophisticated weaponry, Kevlar bullet and blast proof armour and commando trained Elite soldiers.

Our kaum's brave lions may have all lost their lives defending our Guru's home but they gave the enemy one hell of a beating.

And thus their Indian terrorist operation blue star, their destruction of thousands of Sikh life and Sri Akal Takht laid the foundation stone and for the fight for Khalistan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[InderjitS]

 

[genie]

This amazing picture sums it up best

[Singh1989]

QUESTION! Why is Margaret Thatcher mentioned in tag? Was there any evidence Torie's were involved after all? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE!? Or did a labour MP randomly announce Tories were involved AND we sentimental Sikhs agreed, pretending there is hardcore evidence??

[jkvlondon]

52 minutes ago, Singh1989 said:

QUESTION! Why is Margaret Thatcher mentioned in tag? Was there any evidence Torie's were involved after all? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE!? Or did a labour MP randomly announce Tories were involved AND we sentimental Sikhs agreed, pretending there is hardcore evidence??

There have been releases of docs which then got disappeared (because the researcher mentioned what he found) that she was consulted on the post hamla operations like woodrose , how to  change laws to allow holding people without charges etc etc

these are the declassified docs we are entitled to but the conservatives hid them saying that was all of them...thus Labours involvement  in their manifesto

[genie]

3 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

There have been releases of docs which then got disappeared (because the researcher mentioned what he found) that she was consulted on the post hamla operations like woodrose , how to  change laws to allow holding people without charges etc etc

these are the declassified docs we are entitled to but the conservatives hid them saying that was all of them...thus Labours involvement  in their manifesto

Good reply I was going to go into detail to explain to him why the tag, but I think he is a troll or deliberately trying to provoke an nonsensical argument so I'm going to give him a short sharp reply below.

4 hours ago, Singh1989 said:

QUESTION! Why is Margaret Thatcher mentioned in tag? Was there any evidence Torie's were involved after all? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE!? Or did a labour MP randomly announce Tories were involved AND we sentimental Sikhs agreed, pretending there is hardcore evidence??

Question is why does it bother you so much?

[satsangee]

All this stuff about Thatcher being involved is political milage being used by the Labour party.

At that time (throughout the 80's), we had a Sikh labour candidate in Southall - a prominent Khalistani and member of Singh Sabha southall committee.

Nothing was ever mentioned or suggested then about Thatchers involvement.

 

This has all been bought up, because David Cameron was improving relations with the Sikhs above all other Asian communities.

 

The labour party have 13 Pakistani Mp's how many of them would speak up about Grooming ( of Sikh girls in particular).

[genie]

2 hours ago, satsangee said:

All this stuff about Thatcher being involved is political milage being used by the Labour party.

At that time (throughout the 80's), we had a Sikh labour candidate in Southall - a prominent Khalistani and member of Singh Sabha southall committee.

Nothing was ever mentioned or suggested then about Thatchers involvement.

 

This has all been bought up, because David Cameron was improving relations with the Sikhs above all other Asian communities.

 

The labour party have 13 Pakistani Mp's how many of them would speak up about Grooming ( of Sikh girls in particular).

Doesnt matter what part it is, what matters is who is pro-sikh and who has and had anti-sikh policies in place.

Be it labour party or conservative party that's irrelevant, Margaret thatcher definitely had blood of the Sikhs on her hands be it indirectly. She not only provided military support (weapons and Military intelligence) to indira's govt but also while innocent sikh civilians were being raped and butchered and burnt alive in the streets of new delhi she started to condemn British Sikhs back home for celebrating the death of indira hitler gandhi rather than condemn the genocide that was taking place in the same Indian city she was in against Sikhs. The heartless evil b1tch didnt say one word about the 5,000+ Sikhs murdered in 3 days not a single word about it.

Any Sikh with half a brain must hate her and her legacy for that and not defend her like some shameless beasts have tried to do.

You can be a tory or a labour party supporter makes no difference you do not defend the person who has contributed to the death and destruction at sri harmandir sahib in 1984. If any Sikh conservative is found to be proud of Margret thatcher then I would class him/her as a non-sikh thus should never speak or stand up on the behalf of Sikhs.

That m0ron fake Sikh paul uppal knew the strength of feelings Sikhs have about the genocide in 1984 yet he did not campaign to get all the files out the British establishment holds about its role in the genocide he went along with the narrative of david camerons govt that British had a very limited role yet hundreds of files were locked away or not looked at properly. And thus he was unelected in the last general election. If any so called Sikh's political party is more important than their Sikh religion then shame on them and the mother that gave birth to them simple as that.

[satsangee]

1 hour ago, genie said:

Doesnt matter what part it is, what matters is who is pro-sikh and who has and had anti-sikh policies in place.

Be it labour party or conservative party that's irrelevant, Margaret thatcher definitely had blood of the Sikhs on her hands be it indirectly. She not only provided military support (weapons and Military intelligence) to indira's govt but also while innocent sikh civilians were being raped and butchered and burnt alive in the streets of new delhi she started to condemn British Sikhs back home for celebrating the death of indira hitler gandhi rather than condemn the genocide that was taking place in the same Indian city she was in against Sikhs. The heartless evil b1tch didnt say one word about the 5,000+ Sikhs murdered in 3 days not a single word about it.

Any Sikh with half a brain must hate her and her legacy for that and not defend her like some shameless beasts have tried to do.

You can be a tory or a labour party supporter makes no difference you do not defend the person who has contributed to the death and destruction at sri harmandir sahib in 1984. If any Sikh conservative is found to be proud of Margret thatcher then I would class him/her as a non-sikh thus should never speak or stand up on the behalf of Sikhs.

That m0ron fake Sikh paul uppal knew the strength of feelings Sikhs have about the genocide in 1984 yet he did not campaign to get all the files out the British establishment holds about its role in the genocide he went along with the narrative of david camerons govt that British had a very limited role yet hundreds of files were locked away or not looked at properly. And thus he was unelected in the last general election. If any so called Sikh's political party is more important than their Sikh religion then shame on them and the mother that gave birth to them simple as that.

At that time India was doing deals with this British government for Westland helicopters and Sea harrier fighter planes, therefore there was nothing that was going to sabotage the cooperation between 2 governments.

To be honest I admire Thatcher, Sikhs were given all the rights to live here peacefully without fear for losing the right to wear kakkars.

Yes Operation bluestar can never be forgiven, but may be we should look internally for those who let down Sant ji and continue to do so today.

The Akali party misled and betrayed Sant ji, yet Sikhs in Punjab continue to support Akalis.

While countless Sikhs were being martyred during the army action, badal, tohra, longowal and barnala were under police protection.

There were many grasses within gurudware in the UK that betrayed the Khalistan movement and Jathebandis

So if anyone has blood on their hands its our own leaders - we cant even elect a decent leader of our own, how can we point the finger at anyone else.

33 years later were unable to find out where the contents of the Sikh reference libraray are - and yet on the other hand were bringing up Thatcers involvement.

It was the KGB who were involved - are you suggesting we also bring them to book as well ?

[genie]

2 hours ago, satsangee said:

At that time India was doing deals with this British government for Westland helicopters and Sea harrier fighter planes, therefore there was nothing that was going to sabotage the cooperation between 2 governments.

To be honest I admire Thatcher, Sikhs were given all the rights to live here peacefully without fear for losing the right to wear kakkars.

Yes Operation bluestar can never be forgiven, but may be we should look internally for those who let down Sant ji and continue to do so today.

The Akali party misled and betrayed Sant ji, yet Sikhs in Punjab continue to support Akalis.

While countless Sikhs were being martyred during the army action, badal, tohra, longowal and barnala were under police protection.

There were many grasses within gurudware in the UK that betrayed the Khalistan movement and Jathebandis

So if anyone has blood on their hands its our own leaders - we cant even elect a decent leader of our own, how can we point the finger at anyone else.

33 years later were unable to find out where the contents of the Sikh reference libraray are - and yet on the other hand were bringing up Thatcers involvement.

It was the KGB who were involved - are you suggesting we also bring them to book as well ?

You asked about Margret thatcher and I told you why specifically she stands out to be anti-sikh she also said some negavtive things about southall sikhs after the southall riots in 1981 against racist white skinhead attacks funded by the etablishment. I would place you in the category of a non-sikh if you think Margret thatcher is someone to be admired you might aswell admire hitler and indira gandhi and aurangzeb and abdali. Real Sikhs do not hold tyrants and evil heartless people as role models.

Both tories and labour have their faults and positives so thats why I didnt make it a political party issue though conservatives are more about making money for the ruling class "elites" wheres the labour party tends to share out the wealth more on Sikh principles.

Go read my past posts about my exposure about role of KGB in lead up to operation blue star you seem to be a newbie on here with no clue about recently discussed topics.