Jump to content

Is it true that khalsa raaj will come to india after a foreign army attacks over india ?


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 04/07/2017 at 6:20 AM, Big_Tera said:

And whats wrong with being a Hindu if I was one? 

Sikhs are taught to respect all faiths and beliefs. So stop behaving like a child. 

With your issues with Hindus. looks like another hindu hater 

lol

I have many friends of all faiths and proud to say they are my friends. 

I never said there's anything wrong with being a hindu or even being friends with them , as long as they don't brainwash you into thinking all hindus are friendly without agenda.

Are you even aware of the kind of schemes these far-right hindus plot against us ?

because their agenda is of hindi-hindu-hindustan. Right now in india , the south is revolting against hindi language being imposed on them. All this is part of one grand agenda of "one language, one religion, one nationality". 

So , after coming for the christians and muslims, they're going to look at you lol .

And where do you fit in their worldview . You don't ! You stick out like a sore thumb with your pagg (assuming you wear one).

Then what to do with you ? assimilate ! 

I am not even making this up . Look at the proof. Now they're beginning to call harmandar sahib as a hindu temple 

19894425_1575541035803271_1246188339_n.jpg?oh=0b85abed37579126796f723a85a0641f&oe=5963990E

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, shastarSingh said:

China is gaining influence in Nepal. Both Uttar pradesh(UP) and Jharkhand are close to border with Nepal.

UP has 7-8 crore muslim population and Jharkhand has the Maoist fighters fighting against the Indian state.

In the future, China is going to provide the muslims and maoists weapon training and high tech weapons to fight against the Indian state.

The Bhaiya Muslims of India alone are not capable of beating the Hindus. The real strength of Muslim fighters is from the North West area, especially the Pathan belt of Afghanistan and western Pakistan. It is they who will give the Hindus a beating after their eventual victory in Afghanistan and quite possibly Pakistan too. The Muslims of India will probably act as a 5th column in all of this as they did during the 3rd battle of Panipat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jonny101 said:

The Bhaiya Muslims of India alone are not capable of beating the Hindus. The real strength of Muslim fighters is from the North West area, especially the Pathan belt of Afghanistan and western Pakistan. It is they who will give the Hindus a beating after their eventual victory in Afghanistan and quite possibly Pakistan too. The Muslims of India will probably act as a 5th column in all of this as they did during the 3rd battle of Panipat.

I think you assume hindu or india today is same as that of 18th century afghan invasions ! 

Do you know china is making pakistan its economic colony in the name of CPEC. Pakistan has no economical worth. I am more than happy to see it being made a slave of chinese , considering this nation was found on the bloodshed of millions of sikhs in 1947 . 

Also India has way too many arms today and technology to bust any technology-starved afghani or pathan attack. Civil unrest in india is already there to an extent due to cow and mandir issue. Indian muslims are becoming docile nowadays due to "hindu awakening" . Their fights with hindutva is mostly nowadays restricted to making memes ridiculing hindutva or condemning attack on muslims. As the things are now, I don't see a muslim uprising, rather I fear a hindutva uprising among otherwise peaceful hindus.

It is china which could start a spark with india or more likely vice-versa (india undermining china) . If you see recent events, sikkim area already has such an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, acsap said:

The nation who killed Sikhs, we should worry about it. You should, but not sikhs!

Do you even know how many times abdali invaded Punjab?? That is how Khalsa Raj came along!! No body talk about abdali invasion, it is about Khalsa Raj. However, sikhs like you were always worried about abdali, those sikhs are. Muslim now. 

I couldn't care less for India, but unfortunately Sikhs are attached at the hip to India. 

And yeah, Sikhs gave shaheedi against Mughals/Afghans etc and eventually got raj. So today you're saying again Shaheediyan will be given, raj will be attained. Will you be there to give shaheedi? Or are you just volunteering the people of Punjab?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
13 minutes ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

I couldn't care less for India, but unfortunately Sikhs are attached at the hip to India. 

And yeah, Sikhs gave shaheedi against Mughals/Afghans etc and eventually got raj. So today you're saying again Shaheediyan will be given, raj will be attained. Will you be there to give shaheedi? Or are you just volunteering the people of Punjab?

If you think current Indian govt is any semblance of sikh raaj , you're so mistaken. 

Sikhs don't even have proper control over punjab govt. And soon , if current demographic trend is not stopped, sikhs will even stop being majority in their hard-earned state punjab. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Jonny101 said:

The Bhaiya Muslims of India alone are not capable of beating the Hindus. The real strength of Muslim fighters is from the North West area, especially the Pathan belt of Afghanistan and western Pakistan. It is they who will give the Hindus a beating after their eventual victory in Afghanistan and quite possibly Pakistan too. The Muslims of India will probably act as a 5th column in all of this as they did during the 3rd battle of Panipat.

The maoists are also capable fighters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

If you think current Indian govt is any semblance of sikh raaj , you're so mistaken. 

Sikhs don't even have proper control over punjab govt. And soon , if current demographic trend is not stopped, sikhs will even stop being majority in their hard-earned state punjab. 

Where did I state Indian govt today is Sikh raj? Anyone could deduce that I was referring to Maharaja Ranjit Singhs raj. Don't be willfully naive/slow to try and prove a point.

 

You're right in 2nd paragraph. But war is not a solution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/9/2017 at 6:46 AM, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon said:

I couldn't care less for India, but unfortunately Sikhs are attached at the hip to India. 

And yeah, Sikhs gave shaheedi against Mughals/Afghans etc and eventually got raj. So today you're saying again Shaheediyan will be given, raj will be attained. Will you be there to give shaheedi? Or are you just volunteering the people of Punjab?

Did I ask you what you will do for Sikhs ?  You don't know me, so keep your questions to yourself.  I provided you the historical background about the Sikh Raj.  Please don't make it personal, that is not how debate should go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things in India are definitely going the downhill direction. Hindu Muslim relations are worsening day by day. Almost everyday there is news of cow vigilantes killing or severely beating up a Muslims who they suspect of eating beef. Hindu organisations are ready to declare Hindu Rashtra by 2020.

As for Mulsims:

Recently the Muslims of Bengal have had a riot attacking HIndus, burning Hindus shops. The Hindus of Bengal are saying this is due to the CM of Bengal Mamta Banerji appeasing Muslims.

 

In Kashmir Muslim militants killed Hindus Yatris who came for their Amarnath Yatra. This is the first time this has happened  in a long time and shows the extent to how things descending to an eventual conflit. It is happening all over India in Kashmir, UP, Bengal, Maharashtra.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
27 minutes ago, Jonny101 said:

Things in India are definitely going the downhill direction. Hindu Muslim relations are worsening day by day. Almost everyday there is news of cow vigilantes killing or severely beating up a Muslims who they suspect of eating beef. Hindu organisations are ready to declare Hindu Rashtra by 2020.

As for Mulsims:

Recently the Muslims of Bengal have had a riot attacking HIndus, burning Hindus shops. The Hindus of Bengal are saying this is due to the CM of Bengal Mamta Banerji appeasing Muslims.

 

In Kashmir Muslim militants killed Hindus Yatris who came for their Amarnath Yatra. This is the first time this has happened  in a long time and shows the extent to how things descending to an eventual conflit. It is happening all over India in Kashmir, UP, Bengal, Maharashtra.

You forget that hindu state power in india is powerful enough to suppress these muslim acts .

From within , India will never lose. Attack from outside, such as by china which is many times powerful than india could severely destabilize it .

China could attack india over recent doklam issue. Also US vs north korea is another front we don't know how will end.

And then these internal groups could finally have their way if India spins into a mess of anarchy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use