Jump to content

Dealing with people who try to judge your rehat?


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Somebody is confused by every post I make lol.  What is confusing about the above two posts confused people?

Since there is no dislike rating, people use the confused one.

It usually means you have caught the attention of someone who disapproves of your posts (or you). An opponent lol.

Good song btw. Bit controversial though, wonder what the IRA have to say about her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, MrDoaba said:

Since there is no dislike rating, people use the confused one.

It usually means you have caught the attention of someone who disapproves of your posts (or you). An opponent lol.

Good song btw. Bit controversial though, wonder what the IRA have to say about her.

I think they would first cry over the fallen children of Ireland.

I think they would appreciate the homage to their fallen brothers who died for the cause. 

The call to end the violence though, will fall on deaf ears in the IRA until Ireland is unified.


Éire go Brách

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

I think they would first cry over the fallen children of Ireland.

I think they would appreciate the homage to their fallen brothers who died for the cause. 

The call to end the violence though, will fall on deaf ears in the IRA until Ireland is unified.


Éire go Brách

True. The British did what they do best. They're teared apart Ireland. The Loyalists were backed by the government. Although the IRA began to do some questionable things, I cannot fault them overall.

Tiocfaidh ár lá!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MrDoaba said:

True. The British did what they do best. They're teared apart Ireland. The Loyalists were backed by the government. Although the IRA began to do some questionable things, I cannot fault them overall.

Tiocfaidh ár lá!

They definitely did some questionable things.  One they turned to crime, victimizing fellow Irish, to support the movement.  And two they started to target British civilians with terror attacks. 

My family's involvement pre-dated the bomb use.  They were snipers, which is a much cleaner way of fighting, due to the reduced collateral damage.  My family never supported bombings, but it didn't seem to strike home for the British until then.

It makes me less judgmental of other cultures that resort to terrorism.  As much as I don't support those type of means to an end, I always ask myself why does this person feel they must? 

Despite our history supporting the movement, any time a bombing would make the news my grandmother would cry and tell me that wasn't our way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

They definitely did some questionable things.  One they turned to crime, victimizing fellow Irish, to support the movement.  And two they started to target British civilians with terror attacks. 

My family's involvement pre-dated the bomb use.  They were snipers, which is a much cleaner way of fighting, due to the reduced collateral damage.  My family never supported bombings, but it didn't seem to strike home for the British until then.

It makes me less judgmental of other cultures that resort to terrorism.  As much as I don't support those type of means to an end, I always ask myself why does this person feel they must? 

I have spoken to a couple of Irishmen in the past and the majority or Irish folk, according to them, do not support the IRA at all and many would rather not remember the days of the Army. But support for the Unification of Ireland still has strong support.

Woah so your kin were IRA? Is that what inspired you to join the military? And well it hit home for the British because they did nearly off the PM at the time. She was, and is, despised by many Brits.

With the exception of islamic terrorism, the word in itself must be used in context. Today it's used liberally to simply malign a cause which interferes with an agenda. Any act of violence is labeled terrorism without any consideration of the intentions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MrDoaba said:

I have spoken to a couple of Irishmen in the past and the majority or Irish folk, according to them, do not support the IRA at all and many would rather not remember the days of the Army. But support for the Unification of Ireland still has strong support.

Woah so your kin were IRA? Is that what inspired you to join the military? And well it hit home for the British because they did nearly off the PM at the time. She was, and is, despised by many Brits.

With the exception of islamic terrorism, the word in itself must be used in context. Today it's used liberally to simply malign a cause which interferes with an agenda. Any act of violence is labeled terrorism without any consideration of the intentions.

As the purity of the IRA movement declined the support for it declined as well.  Also, since protestants and catholics have made peace under the Republics flag it makes it unsavory to talk about. 

I use the term IRA loosely, which isn't really the most accurate way to speak about the various forms of resistance, but it's the easiest way to get the idea across to people.

My kin have a history of fighting against the British that goes back 700+ years, my family's involvement ended in about 1900, so we actually never were involved the IRA, but it's historical predecessors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use