Demeaning Guru Teghbahadur

[Akalifauj 900]

5 hours ago, JSinghnz said:

Idiots like you show their idiocy by their idiotic behaviour on social media. Try to get urgent help before it is too late.

Is admin or mods going to deal with this guy personal attacks.

[Kira 1,410]

58 minutes ago, JSinghnz said:

Don't forget to take your mental drugs

I did take them thank you for asking. I'm touched you care so much about my well-being.

[JSinghnz 1,086]

35 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

Is admin or mods going to deal with this guy personal attacks.

perhaps you are too poor in understanding who started the personal attacks first.

[Akalifauj 900]

On 03/02/2018 at 7:03 PM, JSinghnz said:

You are insulting the word " Intelligentsia" by posting work of idiots.

This is your first post and its insulting the original poster.  So you started the insults.  And now you insult me with this post.

perhaps you are too poor in understanding who started the personal attacks first.

The original poster is disproving biased and wrong info and you insult him.  How does this make any sense.  Poster harsharan posted a video that speaks against gurmat and you did not bat an eye toward it.  And you never address the content of the post.  You attack the poster.  This really shows who has poor understanding.

[JSinghnz 1,086]

29 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

This is your first post and its insulting the original poster.  So you started the insults.  And now you insult me with this post.

 

 

The original poster is disproving biased and wrong info and you insult him.  How does this make any sense.  Poster harsharan posted a video that speaks against gurmat and you did not bat an eye toward it.  And you never address the content of the post.  You attack the poster.  This really shows who has poor understanding.

Use your grey matter and you will know that I did not insult the OP. I only said the OP is posting work of idiots. He then showed his upbringing and lack of social behaviour. I believe you need to go back to school to understand basic stuff.

[JSinghnz 1,086]

33 minutes ago, Akalifauj said:

This is your first post and its insulting the original poster.  So you started the insults.  And now you insult me with this post.

 

 

The original poster is disproving biased and wrong info and you insult him.  How does this make any sense.  Poster harsharan posted a video that speaks against gurmat and you did not bat an eye toward it.  And you never address the content of the post.  You attack the poster.  This really shows who has poor understanding.

Lol  I really don't know what's wrong with you. So you sitting don't KNOW  where saw that I saw Harsharan's video and then did not bat an eye towards it. You are really a class apart. LOL

[13Mirch 1,163]

3 hours ago, BhForce said:

Continuing on with my point of view: For me, I would say it doesn't really matter to our (Sikh) viewpoint if Aurangzeb was physically present at the execution, or even in the city of Delhi, for that matter. If we insist on that, we open ourselves up to attack from some stray reference that the emperor was actually in some other random city on that dark day.

The important and crucial point would be that 1) the execution was carried out on Aurangzeb's orders, and that 2) Guru Tegh Bahadur ji acheived a moral victory against Aurangzeb's state.

For this victory to have been achieved, it does not matter if Aurangzeb was physically present at the execution or the the city of Delhi.

As an example, the let's take the atrocious attacks of 9/11: In minds of the attackers and of al-Qaeda followers, they achieved a moral victory by smashing planes into various targets. It does not matter that the President (George W. Bush) was actually outside of Washington DC (in Florida). The attack (and victory in their minds) was achieved against the state led by George Bush regardless of where he physically was on that day.

Its been proven he was there, do we really need to start a pointless debate here?

[13Mirch 1,163]

2 hours ago, JSinghnz said:

 

Criticizing your own self now aren't you by referencing your prior post.

[Kira 1,410]

35 minutes ago, JSinghnz said:

Use your grey matter and you will know that I did not insult the OP. I only said the OP is posting work of idiots. He then showed his upbringing and lack of social behaviour. I believe you need to go back to school to understand basic stuff.

[13Mirch 1,163]

3 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

This is your first post and its insulting the original poster.  So you started the insults.  And now you insult me with this post.

 

 

The original poster is disproving biased and wrong info and you insult him.  How does this make any sense.  Poster harsharan posted a video that speaks against gurmat and you did not bat an eye toward it.  And you never address the content of the post.  You attack the poster.  This really shows who has poor understanding.

He probably professes belief in some jatha  which is awaiting the manifestation of Kalki Avatar. Someone standing up for their beliefs screws up their waiting agenda.

[Sukhvirk1976 287]

On 04/02/2018 at 2:55 PM, BhForce said:

Thanks for posting this. A curse on those Marxist Sikhs like Dr. Fauja Singh who are more interested in Marxism than Sikhism.

Well deserving of his fate, no?

Thanks for alerting us of this execrable excuse for a Sikh.

I must apologize to @Sukhvirk1976, he has nothing on this fellow. How strange it is that some Sikhs feel the need to hate on their own history.

Here's more information on the abominable Bikram Lamba:

http://imposteorsikhbikramlamba.blogspot.in/2011/01/impoteor-sikh-bikram-lamba.html

Darshan kar lo, ji:

 

I would like to state, is it a must that we interpret this line in the Bachittar Natak:

‘Shattering the pitcher of his mortal coil on the head of the Delhi emperor, did Teghbahadur depart…’ (15) 

that Aurangzeb was physically present at the execution? I would say that this line is merely metaphorical. Guru Tegh Bahadur ji was not actually smashed against Aurangzeb, rather Guru ji smashed the state led by Aurangzeb. Thoughts?

You don't need to apologise to me mate.. Waking up each morning and living with your need to create falsehoods about sikhi and sikh history is something you need to be sorry about.. It's all love bro one day when you are unable to dance around and avoid facts you'll be apologising to your own consciousness for denying rationalism 

[Kira 1,410]

1 hour ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

You don't need to apologise to me mate.. Waking up each morning and living with your need to create falsehoods about sikhi and sikh history is something you need to be sorry about.. It's all love bro one day when you are unable to dance around and avoid facts you'll be apologising to your own consciousness for denying rationalism 

You've never even touched a Sikh historical text dated pre-20th century..that's a bit rich coming from you. Then again its always one rule for you and another for everyone else.

[Sukhvirk1976 287]

1 minute ago, Kira said:

You've never even touched a Sikh historical text dated pre-20th century..that's a bit rich coming from you. Then again its always one rule for you and another for everyone else.

So many words so little substance 

[Kira 1,410]

3 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

So many words so little substance 

The fact that you never reference them is substance enough. You're nothing more than hot air. 

[acsap 288]

6 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

So many words so little substance 

Why are we still arguing with this Hindu?