Jump to content

Amritsar and Punjab: left out of the New Silk road


Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 8/9/2018 at 10:11 AM, Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh said:

That may well be true but........with one of the Moderators here deliberately not posting up to 50% of my messages here on a wide range of subjects it's pointless me or you attempting to have a conversation about it. Lets just pretend none of this really happened and there is no Belt and Road Initiative. Let's not try having a discussion on a discussion forum.

That's a shame

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi

"Roos cheen hind pe chadh aave"

the setup for payback karma of 84 is under the way i guess lol 

PS : just look at recent news : doklam issue between china and india. Russia now increasingly preferring china and pakistan over india.

Karma is a b**ch . I have an ominous gut feeling that someday all these power dynamics is gonna end up in a big war

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

1) It will be hard to be a part of the silk road given India's animosity towards China; 

2) India does not have a coherent economic plan to move its people out of poverty (GINI coefficient is increasing) and as such Punjab and its proximity to the Silk Road is not regarded or considered. 

3) India treats Punjab as a buffer state between Pakistan and the rest of India. As a result India will not facilitate programs to allow for further investment and economic diversification (i.e. tax holidays, grants, economic hubs etc. ). 

4) China will be the largest economy within the next few years, it will produce a state where all Asian roads lead to Beijing, economic traffic will be 2 ways investment in infrastructure will be constant. In Africa, China has invested heavily in roads, dams, storage facilities, transportation to provide facility and transfer of Africa's resource. In turn, Africa receives investment in infrastructure and has boosted investment in education and good govt. (stability is a requirement for good governance). Name a time when India has chosen to be stable. 

5) India in general and Punjab specifically does not invest in its own people due to the poor planning of the state and Punjab is not in a position to take immediate benefit of the Silk Road if it happens. 

6) Punjab should be asking for autonomy if separation cannot happen. This will allow Punjab to decide its own economic fate and not leave it in the hands of the Center - this is what the recent Farm Protests has shown us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gambler

As if you can resolve all your political issues relating to Sikh, Amritsar or Punjab on a forum? Need to have a proper platform and communication, verbal reasoning and many more skills to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Guest Gambler said:

As if you can resolve all your political issues relating to Sikh, Amritsar or Punjab on a forum? Need to have a proper platform and communication, verbal reasoning and many more skills to do so.

Without land/country and proper funding, none of the above you mentioned is possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gambler
34 minutes ago, S1ngh said:

Without land/country and proper funding, none of the above you mentioned is possible. 

I am in complete agreement with your statement above.  But look at the elites now, they achieved their homeland in diaspora. They unified  their lot and helped each other. And this, they’re still doing by helping only their own and no one else, when it comes to allocating funds. They’ve their own schools, policing, nursing homes for their elderly, day centres and so on. They even have their own ambulances and more. There are plenty rich Sikhs that can do the same for their own community everywhere around the world. Teach children about their own history, not only religious history but also political history, such as why they left their homeland and what happened during partition. How they lost their kingdom and religious shrines and almost all their lands at the time of independence. There is no need to learn our history in parrot fashion, but in a very analytical manner. Sikhs must read their history as critiques and not as victims of it or sufferers. They have to  ask themselves if what happened to them was right, and if it wasn’t then what sort of lessons can be learned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 7/31/2018 at 2:21 AM, Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh said:

Amritsar, as you all know, was once a major city of the old Silk Road. A major international centre of industry and trade. But that's history.

Now lets look to the future: The Chinese are, as we speak, investing over a Trillion $ in what is the world's biggest ever infrastructure project that will deliver a power boost to trade and economic growth:  the New Silk Road (the belt and road initiative). All the other major cities of the old silk road are included. There's only one missing........Amritsar.  There's only one regional country refusing to get involved........India.  Didn't expect a common sense approach from India anyway but there are 3 things that worry me :

1) Why did Amritsar not push itself forward ?

2) Why did Punjab not push itself forward ?

3) Why do none of the pseudo-intellectual 'Punjabis' even seem aware of what is happening ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The economic interests of India are not the same as Punjab. Punjab would be served by having access to corridor being built by China and Pakistan. Also for energy Punjab would be best served by seeing if they can have access to oil and gas pipelines  from Central Asia . This will not happen when India’s foreign policy is in conflict with China. How long this situation can hold is anybody’s guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest China Virus
23 hours ago, Guest SSB said:

Punjab would be served by having access to corridor being built by China and Pakistan. 

Hardly as CPEC solely benefits China and the pedophile worshippers are so impotent they dare not squeak in front of their Chinese overlords in case the Chinese Communist Party dragon burns them to death!

https://www.orfonline.org/research/is-china-replicating-its-xinjiang-model-in-bri-countries/

Already kirpans are often manufactured in China (instead of poor Sikligars throughout India who our community could support instead) so joining CPEC would result in the decimation of whatever minimal industry is left in east Punjab that clowns like Pannun haven't scared away.

23 hours ago, Guest SSB said:

Also for energy Punjab would be best served by seeing if they can have access to oil and gas pipelines  from Central Asia. 

Oil does not come in large quantity from central Asia but in any case there is already joint co-operation between Afghanistan, Pakistan and India on the TAPI pipeline as the central Asian countries want to increase their exports of natural gas to India via the proposed pipeline.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkmenistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan–India_Pipeline

23 hours ago, Guest SSB said:

This will not happen when India’s foreign policy is in conflict with China.

That will probably continue for the foreseeable future as by the year 2050 it is projected China will have a $58 trillion economy with India their closest competitor with an economy by 2050 of around $44 trillion (with the USA only coming in third at $34trillion), the Chinese Communist Party have realised that India is their bigger long term competitor. Especially as the population of China is projected to fall to 1.35 billion whilst India as the significantly poorer country likely to see it's population rise to 1.7billion (up from 1.4billion currently).

https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/research-insights/economy/the-world-in-2050.html

If Sikhs in the Diaspora start to invest in east Punjab in a meaningful way then it is possible that the economy of east Punjab can reach $1trillion in size by 2050

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
On 7/31/2018 at 2:21 AM, Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh said:

All the other major cities of the old silk road are included. There's only one missing........Amritsar.  There's only one regional country refusing to get involved........India.

Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city.

Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor. 

Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road. 

In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East.

Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use