Jump to content

Guest NeelaNishan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest AjeetSinghPunjabi
1 minute ago, jakare said:

No point just posting generally.

But Singh Sabha (unfortunately, what on Earth was going on in their stupid minds) also kicked out the Udasis when they helped to preserve our Gurdware when the Akali Nihang Khalsa was sent to exile.

You have to understand the issues of the time ! 

Sikhism was under serious threat of assimilation and had they udasis not been kicked out , Harmandar sahib would have still had hindu idols in it and you would be wearing a dhoti and tilak for sure . LOL 

we owe our sikhi today to Singh sabha . I mean ofcourse there were some negative aspects of SS as well but I think overall it was the best thing that happened to sikhi in 20th century . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jigsaw_puzzled_singh
7 minutes ago, jakare said:

File:Harimandirbefore1925.jpg

"A Rare Photo of Harimandir sahib in 1908 when it was under the control of the Udasis and Pundits and Sadhus felt free to sit in meditation wearing only a dhoti."

When you say a "rare photo" you mean in the sense that's its long been widely available all over the internet and in books, i.e not very rare at all ? Or are you confusing the word "rare" for the word "old" ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

You have to understand the issues of the time ! 

Sikhism was under serious threat of assimilation and had they udasis not been kicked out , Harmandar sahib would have still had hindu idols in it and you would be wearing a dhoti and tilak for sure . LOL 

we owe our sikhi today to Singh sabha . I mean ofcourse there were some negative aspects of SS as well but I think overall it was the best thing that happened to sikhi in 20th century . 

Harmandir Sahib did not have any Hindu idols, I don't know where you got that from.

Singh Sabha killed off the original practiced Khalsa Maryada, yes I definitely respect them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

Ok one big question why didn't Maharaja Ranjit singh take back custody of Harmandar sahib from Udasis then ??

like was he sleeping ! 

When Maharaja Ranjit Singh was born his father took them to an Udasi Sant to get him blessed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, AjeetSinghPunjabi said:

you would be wearing a dhoti and tilak for sure . LOL 

we owe our sikhi today to Singh sabha .. 

Guru ji used to put tilak on people.  in fact when the Guru put the next Guru on Gurgaddi they used to place a tilak on their head.

So much for you even knowing our history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

interesting how they are sitting in sadhana with their backs to Guru Granth Sahib ...

 

they are not sitting in sadhana they are resting on the banks of Amrit Sarovar, outside the Harimandir Sahib.

also, Guru ji kind of explained that point you made when he went to Mecca, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat, there is a lot wrong with that as it is against rehit! maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use