Jump to content

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, RajKaregaKhalsa1 said:

Mahan Singh,

Please use your brain and don't waste the time of Sangat here. I'm pretty sure you can use your brain and are smart enough to answer your own question. Please do some research and study Sikhi yourself when asking silly, nonsense questions.

A saint is someone who is absorbed in the love of Waheguru ji.

are you telling me, of the 0.1 percent of the earth that are Sikhs - there can only be saints from india....?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
5 hours ago, mahandulai said:

saints exist, all around the world mate,

people will always be accused of this and that. someone could make rumours right now, of baba deep singh, and find some rubbish evidence, don't you think?

uh huh.. just like people are just falsely accusing trump for his immoral lifestyle? 

So, you think drinking, clubbing is part of "Saint" lifestyle?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think kanye West is  he talks a lot of sense

Though I still wonder why he married the woman he married!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, mahandulai said:

are you telling me, of the 0.1 percent of the earth that are Sikhs - there can only be saints from india....?

What are you talking about? I never said there can't be saints of other religions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, mahandulai said:

are you telling me, of the 0.1 percent of the earth that are Sikhs - there can only be saints from india....?

What the hell? Veerji never even said that, read his post properly 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/14/2019 at 11:55 AM, mahandulai said:

all saints are celebrities, agree or disagree?

Is a saint someone who has unique talents, and does well for the world?

so why cant Ronaldo be a saint? if anyone knows him personally and would like to comment, please do

are u mental

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NO. Your new and only saint/Sant is 

 

image.png.6d71145b5385ead2711e054e0d408918.png 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Honestly, I don't know. I will look into the matter and see if some answers comes up. Bear in mind I was talking about regular Sikhs. Not the Gurus themselves. Even if there was a fire, it wouldn't have been Vedic in any sense. Well the difference is in what is meant and being suggested. To them "fire" means the whole Vedic shebang and a return to it. One can equally call out practises from Vedic times which are now obsolete and say "lets return to them!" right back to these groups. It's not hard to concieve in reality that certain things remained similar but the intention of disucssing the matter is important. In the case of weddings, there is very little information. Guru Sahib rejected the janeu for example, to which there is a Sakhi and Bani attached. But it is not until Guru Ramdas Ji that Sikhs get their own ceremony, and again I will repeat I was deducing with regards to the use of fire. Lots of ambiguity. Maybe the couple did just stay sitting or standing whilst Laavan were read by Sangat, maybe not. As for Sikhs such as my great-grandparents, that was just a matter of circumstance. One cannot use that argument to promote a return to Vedic style weddings. ¬† Yes I'm aware that within Hindu weddings it is indeed Agni Devta. But we are talking about Namdharis, and from what I have seen, there is no invocation from Rig Ved - that's what I'm saying, we assume that the fire present in a Kooka wedding is considered as Agni Devta when in actual fact to me, it seems as though it's....just a fire. Which really has no particular meaning per se; just a continuation of one aspect of the ceremony. They read Suhi Mahalla 4. A fire is only Agni "Devta" if one believes and invokes. ¬†
    • the fed is lying to all of us https://www.peakprosperity.com/the-fed-is-lying-to-us/
    • I have a english pdf of Rig veda , the oldest scripture of Hinduism, the oldest of the 4 vedas ,¬†¬†and perhaps the most revered .¬† It starts with a hymn praising Agni and asks it to reside over the 'straw and fodder' of the havan. HYMN I. Agni. 1 I Laud Agni, the chosen Priest, God, minister of sacrifice,
      The hotar, lavishest of wealth.
      2 Worthy is Agni to be praised by living as by ancient seers.
      He shall bring hitherward the Gods. Looking at the index of the scripture , I am surprised , Agni is like everywhere in it almost. So , yes the marriage rites are basically asking Agni devta . "Agni devta" is the main witness of hindu marriage .    EDIT ---- A hymn in another mandal says  HYMN LIX. Agni. 1 THE other fires are, verily, thy branches; the Immortals all rejoice in thee, O Agni So , I think Agni may not be the "fire" as in flames, but rather the heat energy pervading the universe, be it in form of fire energy, metabolic heat in body, nuclear heat inside sun, power plants, etc or the latent fuel inside wood , etc. It basically refers to the "heat" form of god . I could be wrong though. and I don't think I have enough time to go through the vast expanse of the text . 
    • So during marriages of 4th guru onwards , they married by fire ? and that includes Guru Gobind singhji as well ?¬† I am genuinely curious because of the many claims made by RSS about "reminding sikhs of their past" , this is also one that one commonly encounters, that ancient sikhs and gurus married by fire and that it wasn't until those evil pesky britishers who drove a wedge between hindus and sikhs and voila Anand karajs started¬† Whats the meaning of 'laav ' ? perhaps it could mean something altogether then ?¬† Anyways , regardless , I would reckon Hinduism have had far, far more changes to it considering its almost 10 times older than sikhism is (500 vs 5000 !) . Hinduism is so old infact, that rig vedic deities like Indra, Asvins , Maruts,¬†¬†etc are not even heard of today , let alone worshipped¬† Sikhi is more pristine in comparison in the turmoils of time.¬†
    • Just use this:
×

Important Information

Terms of Use