Jump to content

Inter-Racial Marriage Between Sikh and Christian


Guest Guest Amrit
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Guest Amrit

I have been in a relationship with a nonsikh man for the past 4 years, but it has been a secret relationship (meaning my parents don't know). For the past two years we have been talking about marriage, but in Indian or Sikh culture I have realized that this is deemed as unacceptable. But why is it unacceptable? I don't see any reason other than the fact that I wouldn't be able to pass on the culture or bring my children up as Sikhs, but he has agreed to let me do that because he understands that it is something very important to me. If he's okay with that- then why would it still be unacceptable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How exactly do you plan on raising your kids as Sikh?  You have been living a lie for four years yourself. This may seem harsh, but perhaps you should work on yourself before trying to raise someone else as Sikh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sat sri Akal phenji!

There’s nothing wrong with an inter caste or inter faith “marriage” but you CANNOT have an interfaith “Anand Karaj” 

There’s four ceremonies that a Sikh undergoes in his lifetime, ideally.

NaamKaran(naming),

Amrit sanchar(initiation into Khalsa), 

Anand Karaj (marriage)

antim sanskar (cremation after death)

 

if you can live without Anand Karaj, that’s your decision to make. 

Good luck!

wahegurji ka Khalsa, wahegurji ki fateh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The purpose of marriage in sikhi is so that you as a couple practise sikhi together, the foundation of your marriage is supposed to be sikhi that's why we get married in the presence of guru granth sahib ji, that is the whole point of anand karaj. If you read the eng translation of the laavan then you will understand. You can't really fullfill your anand karaj if sikhi is not the foundation of your marriage, it's just an empty ritual then. 

But If your not that religious then it don't really matter who you marry, so your fine lol 

Good luck ... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, puzzled said:

The purpose of marriage in sikhi is so that you as a couple practise sikhi together, the foundation of your marriage is supposed to be sikhi that's why we get married in the presence of guru granth sahib ji, that is the whole point of anand karaj. If you read the eng translation of the laavan then you will understand. You can't really fullfill your anand karaj if sikhi is not the foundation of your marriage, it's just an empty ritual then. 

But If your not that religious then it don't really matter who you marry, so your fine lol 

Good luck ... 

Sikhs are only allowed to marry other Sikhs, it is plain and simple. This stands for any ‘level’ of Sikh. Don’t be fooled by people who say if you’re not a ‘proper Sikh’ then you can do what you like.

If you end up marrying this Christian guy you will probably end up losing your cultural values and religion particularly as you’re a female. Now I know a lot of people are going to say that is being sexist. The truth is I don’t agree 100% with a Sikh male or female marrying a non Sikhs.

But I am even more strongly against  particularly when sikh females marry non Sikhs. The reason is simple.

Males are more dominant in their nature and women tend to follow the faith of their husband. Rarely do men end up following the faith of the wife. That is why Sikh community is protective of females as they are more vulnerable to being converted. We know the reality out there. Women may try and come across as strong and independent but the truth is they always end up following what the man does.

and hence it has nothing to do with being biased towards males. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Guest Guest Amrit said:

I have been in a relationship with a nonsikh man for the past 4 years, but it has been a secret relationship (meaning my parents don't know). For the past two years we have been talking about marriage, but in Indian or Sikh culture I have realized that this is deemed as unacceptable. But why is it unacceptable? I don't see any reason other than the fact that I wouldn't be able to pass on the culture or bring my children up as Sikhs, but he has agreed to let me do that because he understands that it is something very important to me. If he's okay with that- then why would it still be unacceptable?

The question is why did you end up dating a non sikh in the first place? I am sure you could have resisted this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Big_Tera said:

The question is why did you end up dating a non sikh in the first place? I am sure you could have resisted this.

Yeah, that's the key point.

People go around asking, I've been with a guy for five years, and he's so wonderful, I want to get married, what do I do.

That's the wrong question.

The right question is, what were you doing dating him in the first place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

Sikhs are only allowed to marry other Sikhs, it is plain and simple. This stands for any ‘level’ of Sikh. Don’t be fooled by people who say if you’re not a ‘proper Sikh’ then you can do what you like.

If you end up marrying this Christian guy you will probably end up losing your cultural values and religion particularly as you’re a female. Now I know a lot of people are going to say that is being sexist. The truth is I don’t agree 100% with a Sikh male or female marrying a non Sikhs.

But I am even more strongly against  particularly when sikh females marry non Sikhs. The reason is simple.

Males are more dominant in their nature and women tend to follow the faith of their husband. Rarely do men end up following the faith of the wife. That is why Sikh community is protective of females as they are more vulnerable to being converted. We know the reality out there. Women may try and come across as strong and independent but the truth is they always end up following what the man does.

and hence it has nothing to do with being biased towards males. 

Things don't work like that in the real world. Many people are not religious and don't see dating someone of a different faith background as a problem. Some people are just not interested in people of same faith background, that's just who they are

For many people "Sikh" is a cultural tag, not religious. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So, are you saying Guru ji isn't God? Or are you saying the British encouraged this belief?
    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use