Jump to content

Why every sikh shud be environmentalist!


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, shastarSingh said:

We hv one last chance.

The world needs to do 3 things.

Accept Guru Nanak Dev dev ji as Satguru and take Naam from punj pyare.

Reduce world population.

Make eco villages and live green lifestyle even in cities.

Sorry one more thing.

Humans shud totally reject tobacco.

When I was in Delhi, I could feel tobacco while breathing air.

All the fake babaas and bhainchods like ram rahim, ashutosh, radhasoamis tell their chellaas to give up alcohol but not tambakku.

Alcohol is not bajjar kurehit but still it shud be avoided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

.

All the fake babaas and bhainchods like ram rahim, ashutosh, radhasoamis tell their chellaas to give up alcohol but not tambakku.

 

Why don't they tell them to give up Tobacco ?

Most people I think are aware of the need to protect environment, but moving away from living 'modern' life is quite a big commitment for most people. 

I agree with what you said somewhere about plastic. 

I think natural disasters will be Nature's way of protesting (as I have heard in Katha)

 

@shastarSingh Panjabis are terrible from what I have seen with regards to overusing cars. My uncle in Jalandhar would not walk 10 minutes from his house to his workplace because walking is not seen as something 'wealthy' people do in the city ? And the area was reasonable/not dirty

23 minutes ago, proudkaur21 said:

d.ou see people who don't believe in Karam like these abrahamics it is very easy for them to be selfish and do things that better their own interests at the cost of others. But we forgot that. We have done so much paap by destroying the rivers, cutting down the forests , industrializing the meat industry and causing so much terror to innocent animals. The fact that people think all this will not come back to bite them? 

I think 'Dharmis' in India are exactly the same if  not worse, if they are maya/business-minded

 

Does anyone else think that the pressure from Western countries towards India and China to reduce pollution is hypocritical and with an agenda to stop India and China's economic progress ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

Why don't they tell them to give up Tobacco ?

Most people I think are aware of the need to protect environment, but moving away from living 'modern' life is quite a big commitment for most people. 

I agree with what you said somewhere about plastic. 

I think natural disasters will be Nature's way of protesting (as I have heard in Katha)

 

@shastarSingh Panjabis are terrible from what I have seen with regards to overusing cars. My uncle in Jalandhar would not walk 10 minutes from his house to his workplace because walking is not seen as something 'wealthy' people do in the city ? And the area was reasonable/not dirty

I think 'Dharmis' in India are exactly the same if  not worse, if they are maya/business-minded

 

Does anyone else think that the pressure from Western countries towards India and China to reduce pollution is hypocritical and with an agenda to stop India and China's economic progress ?

It is hypocritical.

The world wants to buy cheap things made via Chinese labour and then do drama that China is doing pollution.

All the politicians, media etc. Are bhainchods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

Why don't they tell them to give up Tobacco ?

Most people I think are aware of the need to protect environment, but moving away from living 'modern' life is quite a big commitment for most people. 

I agree with what you said somewhere about plastic. 

I think natural disasters will be Nature's way of protesting (as I have heard in Katha)

 

@shastarSingh Panjabis are terrible from what I have seen with regards to overusing cars. My uncle in Jalandhar would not walk 10 minutes from his house to his workplace because walking is not seen as something 'wealthy' people do in the city ? And the area was reasonable/not dirty

I think 'Dharmis' in India are exactly the same if  not worse, if they are maya/business-minded

 

Does anyone else think that the pressure from Western countries towards India and China to reduce pollution is hypocritical and with an agenda to stop India and China's economic progress ?

These western countries get their textiles made in third world countries so as to not pollute their own environment and also sell the products at way higher prices while making the poor people work in sweatshops. They are all only for money but in order to reduce pollution in their own countries sent manufacturing to 3rd world countries. People think colonialism is over.  Look at these places like LA and all and how much waste they must produce everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

It is hypocritical.

The world wants to buy cheap things made via Chinese labour and then do drama that China is doing pollution.

All the politicians, media etc. Are bhainchods.

facts. They want cheap products made in China and then sell it for way higher prices to make profit and also reduce pollution in their own countries but then do drama of being all for the environment. Buying the latest phone is their priority even if the old one works fine. These so called environment activists living in LA drinking fresh green juice out of plastic cups and talking about saving animals and planet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use