Why panth is not supporting Nangli ji ?

[shastarSingh]

Only Guru Sahib is perfect.

No parcharak is perfect.

But Gurwinder Singh nangli ji is a very big vidvaan.

He has done great sewa of Sarbloh Guru Darbaar.

He is also trying to bring back into the panth the paatth of Bhai nand Lal ji's amazing Bani.

He is also ready to do katha of Gobind Gita and may be Hanuman Natak as well.

Why doesn't the Khalsa panth support him in a way he shud be supported?

[ipledgeblue]

instead panth supports pracharaks that do beadbi and shanka of Chaupai Sahib, such as Gurmat Bibek youtube channel which is on the Sikh videos - intermediate  on the forum banner above.

Gurwinder Singh nangli would never do this cutting of Kabyo Baach Benti Chaupai, he is from sampradaiye which would never do such a thing! so-called panthik people are corrupt. I think he has even done prachar of this shanka and beadbi groups do of Benti Chaupai Sahib bani!

[Jacfsing2]

15 hours ago, ipledgeblue said:

instead panth supports pracharaks that do beadbi and shanka of Chaupai Sahib, such as Gurmat Bibek youtube channel which is on the Sikh videos - intermediate  on the forum banner above.

Gurwinder Singh nangli would never do this cutting of Kabyo Baach Benti Chaupai, he is from sampradaiye which would never do such a thing! so-called panthik people are corrupt. I think he has even done prachar of this shanka and beadbi groups do of Benti Chaupai Sahib bani!

I don’t think any of those groups intentionally go against gurbani, but rather that’s how they go towards because of how they’ve been taught. It’s likely that Bhai Fauja Singh and Sukhdev Singh Babbar wouldn’t have believed in Raagmala; however, Sant Jarnail Singh wouldn’t have considered them anti-gurbani people, (despite him believing Raagmala was 100% gurbani). 
 

Even if we look at the past, there was no hostility between Sant Gurbachan Singh Bhinderwale and Bhai Randhir Singh. 

[ipledgeblue]

On 4/9/2022 at 11:38 AM, Jacfsing2 said:

I don’t think any of those groups intentionally go against gurbani, but rather that’s how they go towards because of how they’ve been taught. It’s likely that Bhai Fauja Singh and Sukhdev Singh Babbar wouldn’t have believed in Raagmala; however, Sant Jarnail Singh wouldn’t have considered them anti-gurbani people, (despite him believing Raagmala was 100% gurbani). 
 

Even if we look at the past, there was no hostility between Sant Gurbachan Singh Bhinderwale and Bhai Randhir Singh. 

doesn't matter about hostility or not, the fact is there is shanka being taught about Benthii Chaupai Sahib for around a century, none of the sampradaiye practise this, and Chaupai Sahib was never read like this in 19th century.

end of the day, we should listen to pracharaks who don't do shanka of bani like Gurwinder Singh Nangli, and not listen as much to those who do, regardless of their feelings and aims. Gurmatt is more about Guru and less about listening to personalities deviating for their own reasons!

 

The raagmala argument goes deeper. However the argument for Chaupai Sahib is a load of nonsense and mischief.