Jump to content

Radhoswami's - Facts on their distorting Sikhi


K Singh 82
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

RSS are not sikhs. They've been declared anti-panthic by Akal Takht. That's enough fact for you. Sikhi is a way of life, not RSS
rss aren't sikhs. They're cultists and they seek to destroy the religion from the inside out.

smartsingh24 u aint very "smart" are you, you keep saying RSS, the topic is about radaoamis.

call me sad but i really wanted to know what 'Naam' was.. they aint allowed to tell no1 when they take it...so i kicked the <admin-profanity filter activated> out of this dude real bad n he told me...

it was 'Waheguru'... well what do u know.. Sikhism...wooooohooooooooo  :doh:

Sarbloh_Singh i guess the winner at the end of the day the radasoami, why? because waheguru is not their naam. what a *edited* you are.

Admin : Use Polite Language Virji

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RSS are not sikhs. They've been declared anti-panthic by Akal Takht. That's enough fact for you. Sikhi is a way of life, not RSS
rss aren't sikhs. They're cultists and they seek to destroy the religion from the inside out.

smartsingh24 u aint very "smart" are you, you keep saying RSS, the topic is about radaoamis.

call me sad but i really wanted to know what 'Naam' was.. they aint allowed to tell no1 when they take it...so i kicked the <admin-profanity filter activated> out of this dude real bad n he told me...

it was 'Waheguru'... well what do u know.. Sikhism...wooooohooooooooo  :doh:

Sarbloh_Singh i guess the winner at the end of the day the radasoami, why? because waheguru is not their naam. what a *edited* you are.

Admin : Use Polite Language Virji

104792[/snapback]

all the same thing. Namdharis, Nirankaries, Radhaswamis, RSS, all the same thing. Anti-panthic, infecting from within, and always trying to recruit. Doesn't matter what name, they all pretty much have the same things. Pakhandi babas, a willing hatred of the righteous path, and a disposition to put others down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sat Sri Akal.......

For all the religions that are anti-Sikhi we should not show any sign of anger or hostility, because that is exactly what they want. Just your about your self and your own beliefs and lets others believe what ever they want.

Sarbloh Singh, whats wrong with you man??, are you a Sikh of the Guru, would a Sikh beat someone up to find out what Naam means???????? NO!!!!!!!

I dont care if you are joking man, please dont bring that here.

And when you used the term "grow some balls" are u joking again??????????

A SIKH would never use such terms.

You know what I think, and hope,that someone else has hacked into your account because a SIKH would never ever act this way.

Sat Sri Akal.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Radaswami people look like sikhs and some members of a family may be sikhs and others RS. Most do not eat and consume alcohol and think thats what makes them RS.

One thing is certain they are not sikhs and should declare themselves as such. Sikhi has no branches and they are not a set belonging to sikhi.

They are theives because their main man (swami) has taken a shabad from the SGGS and secretely passes this to the devotees and they are sworne not to pass this information to anyone and if they do they lose the power of the shabad. The guy has stolen gurbani. I say that because a KHALSA wears his 5 kakars openly and speaks his bani openly and has nothing to hide. The only thing one hides is somrthing which is stolen.

They attend the Gurdwara but do not matha tek SGGS.

They come across as sly people who are hovering to obtain information about naam and which shabad can help to achieve salvation.

Sangat Ji naam is not given by some swami guy it is only GIVEN BY THE GURU JI'S 5 PYARA WHEN YOU GIVE YOUR HEAD IN RETURN and the NAAM IS WAHEGURU GURMANTAR AND MOOL MANTAR. KHALSA DO NOT HAVE TO HIDE THE NAAM BESTOWED BY THE GURU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol nice lil comment 'sher-e-panjab'...

well i wonder if u know what there 'Naam' is cuz th@s what i was told.

and if u do have a problem, i'm happy to fix things up... u should change ur name to 'Ghar Da Sher', u dont even know the meaning behind Sher-E-Punjab...

infact i can be 100% sure they call u a 'Giddur' when u step out the house... I'll eat u 4 lunch so watch it... :nihungsmile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dude if im "ghar da sher" then u must be "internet tay sher" coz u can only yap on like a homo on the net.

"infact i can be 100% sure they call u a 'Giddur' when u step out the house"

thers another thing your wrong about.

as for the namm thing, i knew u were wrong coz naam is 3 or 5 words n some ppl say the radaswami spits in there mouth too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use