Jump to content

Koran, For Research Or Keeping In Home


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i say nothing wrong...

but, you must make sure the koran is properlyrespected, it must kept in a high place where no dust can touch it, i think you may have to do all the musalman stuff before you can read and open the koran?

but the rules must be followed, whichever dharam you wish to follow, we would not like someone from another religion doing beadbhi of SGGS without realising it. we would want them to treat it with great respect. similarly, as long as you can maintain and follow the "muslim maryada" of how to look after the koran, i say nothing wrong with it.

gustaphi maaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Ram Rahim Quran Puran, Anek kahe mat ek na maneo"

Regards

Gursharan Singh

117229[/snapback]

http://www.khalis.net/SikhAwareness/Audio/Choapai.mp3

Perhaps a bit different interepetation to that quote. Listen to the whole audio, its 8:44 mins long and 8meg file.

117495[/snapback]

Pheena

There's nothing wrong in interpretation but when the interpretation totally inverts the traditional understanding of the shabad then it needs to be treated with caution. Unfortunately we have many Kathakars and Viakhiakars who try to give a new and sometimes totally different translation. This appears to be the case here. Anyone with a good understanding of Punjabi/Hindi can understand what the Shabad says and the whole import of the Shabad. Read any good translation of Dasam Granth and this inverted and distorted meaning given y this female viakhiakar to it is not found there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Ram Rahim Quran Puran, Anek kahe mat ek na maneo"

Regards

Gursharan Singh

117229[/snapback]

http://www.khalis.net/SikhAwareness/Audio/Choapai.mp3

Perhaps a bit different interepetation to that quote. Listen to the whole audio, its 8:44 mins long and 8meg file.

117495[/snapback]

Pheena

There's nothing wrong in interpretation but when the interpretation totally inverts the traditional understanding of the shabad then it needs to be treated with caution. Unfortunately we have many Kathakars and Viakhiakars who try to give a new and sometimes totally different translation. This appears to be the case here. Anyone with a good understanding of Punjabi/Hindi can understand what the Shabad says and the whole import of the Shabad. Read any good translation of Dasam Granth and this inverted and distorted meaning given y this female viakhiakar to it is not found there.

117519[/snapback]

Veer ji,

I certainly cannot force you to take on the view of the person in the audio, but i threw it out there for those that might see the same quote in different light. As for it being inverted or distorted, well I'll leave that up to the individual hearing it to conclude upon just as you did. But yes i agree it is definely not your normal accepted interpetations. Some might say Truth never arrives in a normal appearance.

If you follow the few lines after those words, Guru sahib says, " Siri aspaan kirpa tumhre kar, mai na keho sub tohay bakhanyo" Would you say that God himself said that he does not belive in what Ram, Rahim, Puran, Koran says?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WAHEGURU JI KA KHALSA WAHEGURU JI KI FATEH

Didnt Guru Gobind Singh tell us to understand and learn other religions but keep faith in the Guru?

Does anyone have the shabad line?

I totaly agree with Kandola the fact that if they keep the Quran in thier house it should be treated with the muslim maryada. And treat it with the same amount of respect you would give to the Siri Guru Granth Sahib.

WAHEGURU JI KA KHALSA WAHEGURU JI KI FATEH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it surprise you that Waheguru is saying through the Guru that Ram Rahim, Puran, Koran are not to be believed in?

117681[/snapback]

Yes it does because God cannot discriminate, what reason does God have to say that He himself does not belive in Ram Rahim, Puran and Koran? I thought the Divine was beyond religion and is complete in himself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its ok, I know someone in India he is a teacher (Religious techer @ aryan school) and he have all different kind of granths and he take care of them as it is supposed to be done by the religion with whom this granth relates too. well he is a hindu (pandit) but he also have guru granth and he take care of it the same way baba do........... along with this he know many languages too...

So, Its OK!

I wana read all granths, quran and vedas too...

117404[/snapback]

do not say 'guru granth' this is disrespectable. say guru granth sahib jee :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it surprise you that Waheguru is saying through the Guru that Ram Rahim, Puran, Koran are not to be believed in?

117681[/snapback]

Yes it does because God cannot discriminate, what reason does God have to say that He himself does not belive in Ram Rahim, Puran and Koran? I thought the Divine was beyond religion and is complete in himself?

118141[/snapback]

This is more your concept of God that has to believe that all ways towards him are acceptable rather than what the Gurus taught us. So if we follow Pheenamat rather than Gurmat then where Gurbani criticises idol worship then those verses cannot be from Waheguru?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use