Jump to content

Babar Khalsa And Isyf


Anhad_ATL_ISYF
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey guys i have been doing my research about babar khalsa and ISYF :nihungsmile: and aint sure what our sikh bros have to say about theme. Then indian and some other conutries like canada have annouced them illeagle and stuff but are they realy terrorists or helping us shikhs live in peace. In other words do we support them or do we call them terrorists. blush.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Babbar Wanna be

babbar Khalsa are different to isyd and so on. babbars gave saheeedi and where true khalsa like shaheed baba jarnail singh

offcourse they are khalsa. u cant call them terrorists because they are seen as the panth as the faujan of guroo sahib.

comming soon to a pind near u :)

BkJuK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Banned or not, i wouldnt say these groups were terrorist organisation. For example, ISYF's aims were:

1. To promote Sikh philosophy and the Sikh way of life.

2. To promote and preserve the Sikh heritage and culture.

3. To speak out against Human Rights violations.

4. To act as a voice of the oppressed Sikhs of India.

5. To peacefully work towards establishing an independent homeland for the Sikhs - Khalistan.

Despite allegations of assassinations, bombings and kidnappings by the ISYF since the 1980s not a single example from the last 16 years could be provided. Therefore, no evidence was presented to show the ISYF carried out any attacks.

Read more at http://www.sikhlionz.com/isyfban.htm

Freedom fighters are always going to be labeled as terrorists by India and there the ones that pushed to get these people/groups banned elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"one person's terrorist is another person's freedom-fighter"

150530[/snapback]

Well said.

Further more these groups are about liberating one's homeland from oppressive forces. They are not like the like's of the islamist groups who call for the killings of non-believers ethnic and religious cleasening etc,etc.

Those 2 groups were only banned after much pressure and lobbying from the Indian government in return for financial deals and stronger econonmic ties. If in the future these ties are cut because of some diplomatic incident, I gurantee these groups will not only be un-banned but aided by western govt's to look out for their own interests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, Sikhs are da'mn good guys! Just as much as any other 'type' of guys'. We also have our own 'bad guys' or guys with misplaced notions. Just as much as any other 'type' of guys. NO TRUE SIKH CAN BE A TERRORIST -THE GURU AND THE GRANTH DOES NOT ALLOW IT AT ALL. THEY TEACH LOVE,TOLERANCE, FORGIVENESS & PROTECTION OF THE WEAK AND DEFENCELESS! HOW CAN SUCH PEOPLE BE TERRORISTS WHO STRIKE FEAR BY TARGETTING THE WEAK? . Some bad guys amongst us CAN NOT MAKE US us all bad.ON THE CONTRARY THEY WILL RECTIFY THEMSELVES. SOME GUYS CALLING US BAD DOES NOT MAKE US SO - UNLESS WE THINK SO. All The Best Do your research without any such mental tensions or unnecessary thoughts, WAHE GURU will guide you through and show you the way ahead - ALWAYS . HAVE FAITH . DK.

Hey guys i have been doing my research about babar khalsa and ISYF  :nihungsmile:  and aint sure what our sikh  bros have to say about theme. Then indian and some other conutries like canada have annouced them illeagle and stuff but are they realy terrorists or helping us shikhs live in peace. In other words do we support them or do we call them terrorists.  blush.gif

150505[/snapback]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

If you think That the people who belong to the group BKI, are freedom fighters then why did they kill so many youngsters with their families. THE WORD FREEDOM FIGHTER MEANS THE ONE WHO FIGHTS FOR THE INNOCENT & NOT ONE WHO KILLS THE INNOCENT. If you don't beleieve me then ask the mother or father who lost their child or children because of them. Or a person who lost his / her family because of these people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use