Jump to content

AKJ OR SIKH sangat?


Guest learner singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

i heard once that the British once said that Sikhs can conquer  the world in 7 days but can not rule for a single day.  food for thought.

Can't help but agree with that statement.

No matter how negative we are, I still feel we are able to successfully unite and when we do we are commendable. What other religious group in UK is able to arrange a Nagar Kirtan or something similar. All Khalsa jathas/sampardys unite.

After a Nagar Kirtan, a muslim friend once said to me that muslims could never unite to organise anything like this. Come to think of it, neither could Hindus or Christians.

Just being an optimist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

There are more than 40 jatha bandeess ohmy.gifohmy.gif that's a huge split..

Even i respect all jathas, but i strongly think we need to be united.. YES in names too.. Just "khalsa" !

I agree that we need to be one, BUT, how can we unite when we all don't the follow the same Sikhi? So many people follow different levels and flavors of Sikhi. And they all claim to be Sikh, from monas with large khandas around their necks to Sehajdhari people that wear turbans but trim their beards. :T:

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the end this is how i see it......when someone is doing Kirtan in a Smagam held by a Jatha?? Who is doing that kirtan?? A sikh? A Jatha person? From where is that Kirtan coming from?? From his Jatha or his heart and who's heart is it, the Jathas or Waheguru's? What lies in his Heart his Jatha or Khuda??

The Jatha is just a gathering of people, But it is Waheguru himself who sings from that Kirtanees heart. Not his Jatha. The kirtan is coming from his Heart, not his Jatha. In one's heart he can be a Sikh of the Guru, but he cannot be a Akjer or Dodra or Taksali.

Waheguru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another way of looking at it is that whatever sangat that you are with thats the way you become. For example if you hang with sehajdharees then you will be sehajdharee. If you hang out with Singhs who follow full GurSikh rehit then you become like them. Sangats are essential, but there are so many of them with different levels of Sikhi being followed.

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree with akjforever... especialy recently, i've noticed a bit of a change in myself, that i'm becoming so much more adept to sikhi and so much more concentrated and dedicated to it, and it's no doubt largely due to the fact of the people i'm with at samagams and such. I agree with akjforever in large part. who you hang out with does have a huge influence on your own character, but the only difference in my opinion is it doesn't have a full influence on you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i heard once that the British once said that Sikhs can conquer the world in 7 days but can not rule for a single day. food for thought.

If we agree to that quote, then they were sucessful in breaking us down. In the past alot of things were done by those british in order to weaken Sikhi! And that quote is a minor part of their bigger activities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use