Jump to content

AKJ OR SIKH sangat?


Guest learner singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 28
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Little history for those who don't know : Sikhsangat.com waz first started by daljeet (TO), amardeep (UK) and me (CAL) .. and none of us were amritdhari by that time (still waitin for amar :) to take khalsa flight) and neither we had much knowledge about dozens of A-Z jathas.. (certainly not me).. So at the end it's a neutral place for anyone :(

SIkh = Sikh

There is no A sikh, B sikh or Z Sikh.. (It's boundry created by our mind and i think we should think outside of box :@

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sat Sri Akal:

Sorry Singh Sahib, if you poll the forum, you'll find out that the majority of people here do not claim "AKJ membership".

ADMIN NOTE: Sadh Sangat Jee, we humbly request that you close this topic of conversation. The Singhs and Kaurs in Akhand Kirtani Jatha *are* Sikh sangat, and so are other Sikhs. We are on the borderline of another stereotyping, hate-mongering, anti-jatha argument. We are sorry for being so defensive about this, but Panthic Ektha is PRIORITY NUMBER *ONE*.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vwihgurU jI kw Kwlsw!

vwihgurU jI kI &iqh!!

I dont know about anyone else here, but i aint part of AKJ, Nihang or Taksal, im part of the Khalsa Panth, if people wanna say "im AKJ", "im a Taksali", "im a Nihang" and forget about being a united khalsa which is not segregated then thats up to them. When Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji Maharaj created the Khalsa Panth to create unity and abolish any caste ties, why have we started putting ourselfs into jathebandi/samparda boxes? :)

im a Sikh of Sri Guru Nanak Sahib Ji Maharaj thats it, not akj, not taksal, not nihang

Gurfateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gur Fateh!

Gurbar Akaaal, I note your comments and whilst agreeing in principle for unity as per the message of Gurdev Pita, I don't believe that means everyone is the same and identical.

"Unity through diversity" is what I believe Guru Ji wanted, for the entire world and for the Sikhs -one can see this if one compares the accounts of Bhai Daya Singh, Bhai Nand Lal, Bhai Khanyia Singh and Banda Singh Bahadur -all Sikhs, but not necessarily Amritdhari or identical in rehit...

...I do not wish to have this discussion fall into an argument on jathas or jathabandis or sampardya, but I personally feel people's realtionship with Maharaj cannot be identical...

...the contrast to this is Unity in the form of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi's where everyone dresses, looks, thinks, believes and behaves the same way...consider this carefully (and the youth camps, ladies camps and speeches of the Nazis) and compare to the thoughts and events organised by many who claim to be propagating Sikhi today and you'll find a nasty taste in your mouth...

Please forgive any foolish statements in the foregoing

-I remain the Charandhoor of the Sadh Sangat-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gur Fateh!

Gurbar Akaaal, I note your comments and whilst agreeing in principle for unity as per the message of Gurdev Pita, I don't believe that means everyone is the same and identical.

"Unity through diversity" is what I believe Guru Ji wanted, for the entire world and for the Sikhs -one can see this if one compares the accounts of Bhai Daya Singh, Bhai Nand Lal, Bhai Khanyia Singh and Banda Singh Bahadur -all Sikhs, but not necessarily Amritdhari or identical in rehit...

...I do not wish to have this discussion fall into an argument on jathas or jathabandis or sampardya, but I personally feel people's realtionship with Maharaj cannot be identical...

...the contrast to this is Unity in the form of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi's where everyone dresses, looks, thinks, believes and behaves the same way...consider this carefully (and the youth camps, ladies camps and speeches of the Nazis) and compare to the thoughts and events organised by many who claim to be propagating Sikhi today and you'll find a nasty taste in your mouth...

Please forgive any foolish statements in the foregoing

-I remain the Charandhoor of the Sadh Sangat-

Gur Fateh,

"...I do not wish to have this discussion fall into an argument on jathas or jathabandis or sampardya, but I personally feel people's realtionship with Maha

raj cannot be identical..."

Just to clarify, I simply which to state here that one's relationship with Maharaj is exactly that their own...as Sadh Sangat we simply come together to support each other and share the collective experience...Maharaj is so vast that experience of Akaal is equally vast and diverse...as therefore are the methods and means to do so...

[Personally, for me, Khalsa Singhs have a quickest route, but this is for me...by Kirpa and Karam...another may, by the same 2 factors be more suited to a Ba'hai, Mahayana Buddhist, Shia Islamic, Udasi Sadhu or Greek Christian lifetsyle...this is all forms of Maharaj's play...**Manas Ki Jaat ko, Ekeh pachaan bo**...**Kudrat da khel rachaiya...**]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use