Jump to content

Rehit?


Guest (no name)
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

enough bickering, close this thread already

LOL.gifLOL.gifLOL.gif Did you just slam your head in the monitor :D :@ .

you would like that wont you? <_< buh nothings gonna happen to my head buh the monitor would sure fall from the table and break LOL.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest s133k_s1kh
you would like that wont you? :D buh nothings gonna happen to my head buh the monitor would sure fall from the table and break LOL.gif

Le why would i like that :@ and that too when it won't hurt you tongue.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you keep bringing the kakkars into the issue? You don't like them? As for the statement about Bhagat Farid, it is Bhagat Sheikh Farid. It is not Farid Sani. To cover one lie, no need to incent more lies.

Read Bhagat Sheikh Farid's bani and see what he is saying and then tell me if he was here during the time of Guru Nanak or not. I know you are a student, that is why you are after me. Trying to establish that you are the greatest University student alive. Haha!

Why again did you bring the kakkars into the horse issue? Why are you trying to go off topic and change this topic into a discussion on kakkars? Who is questioning kakkars here? No one is. Maybe you.

Kakkars are mentioned everywhere in history, rehatnamas, hukamnamas, and Gurbani.

Aside from a couple of karam kaandee rehatnamas, sarabloh isn't mentioned anywhere.

To say that Bhagats were stuck in Karam Khund before Guru Nanak Dev Ji shows the amount of anti-Gurmat hatred and shows the lack of gyan. It is a direct disrespect of Bhagats to say that they were stuck in Karam Khund before. Shows you or your dehdhari didn't have too much gyan of Gurbani.

Even a Sukha addict who reads even a little bit about Bhagats will know that some of them came before Guru Nanak Dev Ji.

As for the comment related to Raam Raam Kurtaa, you just wrote what I wrote. Guru Shabad veechar. Waheguru isn't the only Guru Shahbad. Guru Shabad is Gurbani. Wake up!

Looks like you have been brainwashed by tapoban. I live on Goreway too, if you ever want a meeting.

Another question, are you getting mad?

Have we met before in person? I don't know. Which University do you go to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Kakkars are mentioned everywhere in history, rehatnamas, hukamnamas, and Gurbani."

khalsa fauj, please give me a tuk in which the 5 kakaars are mentioned

otherwise if you cant, shut up and stop preaching rubbish

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To cover one lie, no need to incent more lies.

Read Bhagat Sheikh Farid's bani and see what he is saying and then tell me if he was here during the time of Guru Nanak or not. I know you are a student, that is why you are after me. Trying to establish that you are the greatest University student alive. Haha!

The research by many scholars says the same thing. 300 years have passed since Guru Gobind Singh jee's time. The first Sheikh Farid was 300 years before Guru Nanak. If Punjabi has changed so much in the last 300 years, wouldn't it just logically speaking change the same amount between the first Sheikh Farid and Guru Nanak? Why is the language contemporary? Simple logic.

Why again did you bring the kakkars into the horse issue? Why are you trying to go off topic and change this topic into a discussion on kakkars? Who is questioning kakkars here? No one is. Maybe you.

Kakkars are mentioned everywhere in history, rehatnamas, hukamnamas, and Gurbani.

Really? Find me ONE rehitnama that even uses the WORD kakaar or even lists them. Find me a tuk from Gurbani. There's one fake hukumnama to the Kabul Sangat that is acknowledged as a fraud. Find me any reference to kakaars. The only ones are in teh Bhatt Vehis which say Keski is a kakaar.

My point in bringing up kakaars is that if you want references for sarbloh bibek, then apply the same standard to all other rehits as well.

To say that Bhagats were stuck in Karam Khund before Guru Nanak Dev Ji shows the amount of anti-Gurmat hatred and shows the lack of gyan. It is a direct disrespect of Bhagats to say that they were stuck in Karam Khund before.

It's a lack of respect of Gurmat to suggest anyone can go to Sachkhand without Gurparsaad and Gurmat Naam.

Even a Sukha addict who reads even a little bit about Bhagats will know that some of them came before Guru Nanak Dev Ji.

Based on Janamsakhis and other records, it's a fact that all bhagats met and became Sikhs of Guru Nanak.

As for the comment related to Raam Raam Kurtaa, you just wrote what I wrote. Guru Shabad veechar. Waheguru isn't the only Guru Shahbad. Guru Shabad is Gurbani. Wake up!

Look up the term "Gur Shabad" in Guru Granth Sahib. Find all the examples you can. Look at the "shabad" it will have an aunkarh under it. This indicates it is a singular noun. ONE Shabad. If it referred to all the shabads in Gurbani it would have no aunkarh. Gur Shabad is one word and is Gurmantar.

I feel sorry for you to be honest. Someone who doesn't believe in naam. Guru Sahib has said

ਮੂਰਖਾ ਸਿਰਿ ਮੂਰਖੁ ਹੈ ਜਿ ਮੰਨੇ ਨਾਹੀ ਨਾਉ ॥੨॥

How unfortunate that someone calling himself a Sikh makes fun of naam?

Looks like you have been brainwashed by tapoban. I live on Goreway too, if you ever want a meeting.

hahah! Hardly. If I've been "brainwashed" by Tapoban, then you've been brainwashed by Dr. Darshan Singh.

Another question, are you getting mad?

Have we met before in person? I don't know. Which University do you go to?

We have not met as far as I know. I go to the University of Ottawa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some other questions.

Do you only listen to raag kirtan?

Do you agree to the khunden of kirtan by chanting Waheguru Waheguru in the middle of a Shabad? (This is serious beadbi of Gurbani)

Do you listen to proper raags at proper times?

Using Vaaja isn't puratan either. Why do you use it then?

How about toothpaste, don't use it since it has meat in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some other questions.

Do you only listen to raag kirtan?

Do you agree to the khunden of kirtan by chanting Waheguru Waheguru in the middle of a Shabad? (This is serious beadbi of Gurbani)

Do you listen to proper raags at proper times?

Using Vaaja isn't puratan either. Why do you use it then?

How about toothpaste, don't use it since it has meat in it.

You won't answer my questions or debate properly but I see no harm in answering your questions

1) I listen mostly to the live broadcast from Sri Darbar Sahib.

2) I do not agree with doing dhunni in the middle of the Shabad unless it is spontaneous due to surti going to Dasam Duaar.

3) I listen to whatever is broadcast.

4) How do you know I use a vaja or anything else?

5) I use Uncle Tom's toothpaste which is vegetarian.

Although raag is good and important, it was at the time of Guru Arjun Dev jee that the tradition of Jotiaan tunes was started. If someone does not know raag does it mean that someone shouldn't try to sing a shabad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GuruShabad is singular because only Bani parvaan by Guru Ji is Guru. You have understood that when there is aukarh, it is singular so that is good. Your defintion of naam is different from mine. Your definition of naam is 1 word. My naam is all of Gurbani. What is better? One word of Gurbani?

As for Fareed, it is Sheikh Fareed not Farid Sani. Show me one Gurbani tuk where he says Farid Saani? Also the Farid Saani you talk about, his name was Sheikh Brahm (Ibrahim).

All Sakhis and Nanak Parkash mention Guru Nanak Dev Ji meeting Sheikh Brahm.

As for the new pseudo scholars, they say whatever they want. There is no control over them. As for the descendents, it doesn't matter who they say. Descendents don't always tell the truth.

Read on all Bhagats and see what you get about their life times.

Also the questions posted above, they are the main things. Do you follow them? If not then why you preaching karam kaand?

They can sing the Shabads that aren't in raags. E.g. Sloaks and vaars. Guru Sahib also told us to listen to Kavishers and Dhadis, do you do that? Do you follow everything that Bhai Randhir Singh says? If not, then which things that he said don't you follow?

You still didn't answer the question about Nagar Kirtans and plates and glasses and the use of doonas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this makes me sad. guru kirpa karey

o meri gal nahi sun nee theek aa. par guru di gul tey suno.

bhuqw bolxu JKxu hoie ]

bahuthaa bolan jhakhan hoe ||

To speak too much and babble is useless.

ivxu boly jwxY sBu soie ]1] rhwau ]

vin bolae jaanai sabh soe ||1|| rehaao ||

Even without our speaking, He knows everything. ||1||Pause||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If relationship with Guru is strong, then kanga is done twice a day, and turban should never be taken off or put on like a hat as it is against rehit, maryada is to take off every layer of turban/pagh/dumalla individually, and tie fresh turban each time!
    • the whole 'your husband/wife is chosen for you'/sanjog thing is real, it's just that a lot of people end up marrying the wrong person. they did not end up with the person that was meant for them. my friend, you should marry someone who you feel a connection with and love. there are millions of sikh girls, i'm sure you can find someone who aligns with your sensibilities and who you can truthfully say that you love. sikhi does not say anything against love marriages. you can also be in a loveless arranged marriage which is a safe option b/c both families are more inclined to keep the union intact. i was one of those people who was like meh, i guess i'll just get arranged to some sikh. well i finally started dating for the first time this year and i'm getting married to someone that i love and cannot even imagine leaving. i think it's better to have lost & lost than never loved at all. unfortunately, a lot of people confuse love w/ looks & lust. a lot of men go for the fittest girl they can find and think they won the jackpot or something. in reality, your partner should be like an extremely loved best friend. there's a reason why it's a fact that the most stable and long-lasting relationships started as friendships.  i also think a lot of women are petty and divorce over small reasons, but there's other terrible things like high cheating rates as well. that's why the divorce rate in the west is high. be careful out there.
    • andrew tate praises sikhi too & likes sikhs. his brother also donated to sikh families iirc. they just like any "alpha" religion and tbh islam is the most "alpha" in their eyes. islam is very good at promoting that image. but imo a real alpha man doesn't command respect by beating up his wive(s) or forcing them to wear a burqa. a real man will have his woman listen to him w/o raising a hand or his voice, and command respect by being respectful. he leads by example and integrity. that's true masculinity. you get the idea. + yes, it's definitely true that islam is growing rapidly and making massive inroads. strength in numbers + belief will do that. but rlly it's just because of the birth rate. a lot of them are muslim b/c it's their "identity" just like how a lot of young sikhs will say they're "culturally sikh" or whatever. there just aren't billions of sikhs who lambast their identity everywhere and have strict and linear rules like in islam. besides, the reality is that islam and its followers are some of the most morally bankrupt. you can see all the weird trans rules in iran, bacche baazi in afghanistan, visiting brothels, watching p*rn, p*dophilia what goes on behind the scenes in countries like uae & qatar, etc, and come to your conclusions. you can google all the stats yourself and see which countries do the most of these ^.   
    • stop associating with hinduism, that's the absolutely worst thing you can do as a sikh. not sure if you noticed but the entire world looks down upon and spits at india & hindus, literally no one respects them and considers them weak and cowardly. literally 1+ billion of them but not perceived as a strong religion commandeering respect. 
    • you wrote a whole lot but told us nothing. what exactly did you do wrong to make you feel this way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use