Jump to content

What Jatha are You Part Of?


Surrey Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Akaal108

I dont think problem is with the jathas. I think the real problem is when one's jatha people start claiming the superioty on others like assuming "They have a best interperatation of gurmat/khalsa" or claim the most accurate khalsa orthodoxy.

I think thats a only problem. If jathas are tolerant and more acceptable of other jatha's we wouldnt have a conflict like we are having now...

Think of this way:

Jatha's or sampardha's are diffferent schools but teaching the same thing "Naam" "Dhaan" "Ishanan"...yes principles or beleif might be different but its a same goal which is bhagti kardaie kardaie jagasouo/sikh.. guroo which mil jaavaie....

Kabir saloks come it goes "tuu tu karta tu hoya mujmaie raha no koi" (hopefully got it right here, sowwie for mistakes)

If jatha or sampardha aims are one but having all these petty fights between each other ....then IT IS APNI MOOORAKHTAIE HAIE.....because the true purpose of jatha is like different university but gettin same value of degree...

anyways thats my opnion..

Akaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal hiiii akaaaaaaaaaaaaal

anand hiiiiiiiiii anand ^_^^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think problem is with the jathas. I think the real problem is when one's jatha people start claiming the superioty on others like assuming "They have a best interperatation of gurmat/khalsa" or claim the most accurate khalsa orthodoxy.

I think thats a only problem. If jathas are tolerant and more acceptable of other jatha's we wouldnt have a conflict like we are having now...

Think of this way:

Jatha's or sampardha's are diffferent schools but teaching the same thing "Naam" "Dhaan" "Ishanan"...yes principles or beleif might be different but its a same goal which is bhagti kardaie kardaie jagasouo/sikh.. guroo which mil jaavaie....

Kabir saloks come it goes "tuu tu karta tu hoya mujmaie raha no koi" (hopefully got it right here, sowwie for mistakes)

If jatha or sampardha aims are one but having all these petty fights between each other ....then IT IS APNI MOOORAKHTAIE HAIE.....because the true purpose of jatha is like different university but gettin same value of degree...

anyways thats my opnion..

Akaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal hiiii akaaaaaaaaaaaaal

anand hiiiiiiiiii anand ^_^^_^

i think thas an excellent view on this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

k man, the truth in my opinion is that jathas are gettin bad because of youth and hankaar.

ever since this generation got online, i've b'n comming acroess new rules...only amritdharis can do langar di seva..etc. like u'll never hear this stuff commin from a mature person only from youth so its kinda wierd..........

and chamkilla said it rite..jathas are turning sikhi backwards...into castisim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think Neo veerji said it truly how it should be....that there should be prem and respect between all the jathas....cuz ultimately we ARE all one...

i just wanted to add one more thing...

some people on this board are pointing out how jathas are man made and that's why they are bad and what not...

a lot of the jathas out there were started by puran gurmukhs not with the aim to segregate or anything...they simply saw a lack of sangat where they lived and started doing sangat, doing kirtan, doing seva, doing sikhi prachaar...and these sangats grew and became known as jathas...i don't think there is anything wrong with that...all these gurmukhs are given this seva by Guru ji himself....when a gurmukh gets to a certain stage...there life is dedicated to doing Guru Ji's hukam ...this is all seva that they are doing....so we shouldn't be hesitant to go to a sangat just cuz it wasn't started directly by Guru ji ... i think we need to remember that it's not just about doing simran for ourselves but also about getting others to do simran....there's a tuk that reminds us of this...

jan naanak dhhoorr ma(n)gai this gurasikh kee jo aap japai avareh naam japaavai ||2||

Servant Nanak begs for the dust of the feet of that GurSikh, who himself chants the Naam, and inspires others to chant it. ||2||

but the key is as NEO veerji pointed out...the people that do the various sangats have to accept the others as their brothers and sisters in the Khalsa panth...not bikker over little points or differences.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest balwinderkaur
Thats why the other religionshave gone off the right path thats why sikhi was created. so if we have all these Jathas we will be doing the same thing as these other religion with all these different rehat no one will know what to follow, thats why we should get rid of all the Jathas and have one called the Khalsa and one rehat.

First thing you should do is change your name to sikhiforever.

FABULOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!! Big up to you chamkila veer. ;):(^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest balwinderkaur
I dont think problem is with the jathas. I think the real problem is when one's jatha people start claiming the superioty on others like assuming "They have a best interperatation of gurmat/khalsa" or claim the most accurate khalsa orthodoxy.

I think thats a only problem. If jathas are tolerant and more acceptable of other jatha's we wouldnt have a conflict like we are having now...

Think of this way:

Jatha's or sampardha's are diffferent schools but teaching the same thing "Naam" "Dhaan" "Ishanan"...yes principles or beleif might be different but its a same goal which is bhagti kardaie kardaie jagasouo/sikh.. guroo which mil jaavaie....

Kabir saloks come it goes "tuu tu karta tu hoya mujmaie raha no koi" (hopefully got it right here, sowwie for mistakes)

If jatha or sampardha aims are one but having all these petty fights between each other ....then IT IS APNI MOOORAKHTAIE HAIE.....because the true purpose of jatha is like different university but gettin same value of degree...

anyways thats my opnion..

Akaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal hiiii akaaaaaaaaaaaaal

anand hiiiiiiiiii anand ^_^^_^

valid points made... good ;) btw the tuk should read

KABEER TU TU KARTA TU HUAA MUJH MAIN RAHA NA HU

JAB AAPA PAR KA MITT GYA JATT DEKHO TATT TU :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • was researching this and came back to this thread. Also found an older thread:    
    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use