Jump to content

Dating Engagments & Marriage


The One
 Share

Recommended Posts

i read this on another post by dal singh

"If Sikhs can't bring their own kind into marriages we may as well give all non-amritdhari girls away to muslims or something because they are nothing to do with us ......no? "

my question is ... can a non amritdhari marry non amritdharis??

theirs a hukamnama i think by guru gobind singh saying that one should give their daughters hand in marriage to a gursikh??

does this mean that people that may not be amritdhari should get married to amritdharis??

i might be wrong

but in this day and age dating, marraige etc.. is becomnig a regular question amongst youth?

is their anything in sikhi that says you cannot have a partner on the journey of life before you are even married?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in an ideal world amritdharis would only marry amritdharis. However becasue this is so rare these days, iin order to absolve their responsibility parents are marrying their kids of to anyone. My own amritdhari relatives have married thier daughters of to non-amritdhari boys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguroo jee ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo jee kee Fateh!

I would say its more of a matter of common sense than hukum. Simply put, marry someone on the same path as yourself. If you took amrit, usually that means something: that you have agreed and sworn yourself unconditionally to the path prescribed by Guru Gobind Singh.

If your partner hasn't, why? Do they not follow that same path? If they do, then taking amrit shouldn't be a problem. If they don't follow it... that's just a sign of possible disagreements in the future.

Waheguroo jee ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo jee kee Fateh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the problems comes when we assume that an amritdhari is going to make guru sahib the center of their lives.

sadly, this is not the case more often than not.

and khalsa veer summed it up pretty well :TH:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguroo jee ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo jee kee Fateh!

I would say its more of a matter of common sense than hukum. Simply put, marry someone on the same path as yourself. If you took amrit, usually that means something: that you have agreed and sworn yourself unconditionally to the path prescribed by Guru Gobind Singh.

If your partner hasn't, why? Do they not follow that same path? If they do, then taking amrit shouldn't be a problem. If they don't follow it... that's just a sign of possible disagreements in the future.

Waheguroo jee ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo jee kee Fateh!

oooh , i like that :e:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ssa

sangat ji.. instead of finding an amritdhari for marriage (which nowdays is rare)..why dont u marry a non amritdhari and take it as a challenge 5to make him/her an amritdhari....

we all critise muslims 4 convertin sikhs to islam.. man its not there ability to spread dere religion.. but our inability to protect our religion...

bhul chukk maaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think these days we make amrit too light of a concept...

to say that if someone is on the path, then taking amrit shouldn't be a problem...i think that isn't very accurate...

the panj piyaray gave their heads for amrit...there were thousands of people that day...all those thousands of people were on the path, just not at the point where they had full faith in the guru to do whatever he said...the guru still loved them and considered them his sikhs and eventually they took amrit also..

we shouldn't assume that because taking amrit may have been natural for us in our lives that it would be for everyone that wants to become a gursikh...some people have many hurdles as a result of their past karams, their environment, and even battling their minds and battling all that society has put into our heads from birth.

Marriage shouldn't come down to amritdhari or not...there should be mutual respect and understanding of each other's goals...and the spiritual goals should be similar...the partners should be committed to their own spiritual growth and that of helping each other also...if one is an amritdhari and follows rehit, then that's an area they could help the partner...if the other partner has a huge love of doing seva of sangataaan of humanity...that's an area they could help the other partner....never assume that we can't learn or be inspired by a partner who might not have taken amrit yet...

ideally, both would be amritdhari...however we don't live in an ideal world...and simply have two amritdhari partners isn't a guaranteed recipe for a happy and healthy marriage..

in response to the post above mine....we don't have the power to make anyone an amritdhari...that is something that guru ji blesses a person with...only thing we can do is work on ourselves and live in His remembrance together and do ardas for His blessings...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amritdhari marry Amritdhari

Non Amritdhari marry Non Amritdhari

Simple, as per rehit maryada.

Theres no need for difference, if someone wants to come into Sikhi, then maharaj will sort it but no excuse for marriage between amritdhari and non amritdhari. Learn the significant difference, you cant share anything with your partner if they are not amritdhari so whats the point, you will have no relationship. The purpose of anand karaj is to join to souls together, if the 2 souls are not yet pure with amrit, your defeating that object straight away. you cant share any food, or ne other relation. Theres been loads of posts when one person in a marraige has commited a kureit and people have asked what happens?

Same thing, sorry, its harsh, but sikhi isnt for light hearted, its for the dedicated who love their guru. Thats not to say that those who are not into sikhi dnt love guru ji before accusations are raised. Love your Guru Enuff to sacrifice your life for him, marry him in the amritsanchaar and become one with death.

Read some rehit maryada or go and speak to the panj pyaara.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Narinder Singh
ssa

sangat ji.. instead of finding an amritdhari for marriage (which nowdays is rare)..why dont u marry a non amritdhari and take it as a challenge 5to make him/her an amritdhari....

we all critise muslims 4 convertin sikhs to islam.. man its not there ability to spread dere religion.. but our inability to protect our religion...

bhul chukk maaf

Uhhh...that doesnt sit right with me, make someone Amritdhari? Shouldnt we focus on our own jeevan and set examples if we want change? Help someone simply to help them, not to turn them into what we want them to be, thats selfish.

Amrit is not for everyone, and it given to those who Guru Sahib does kirpa on, dont ever forget that (a lot of Amrtdharis do).

Fateh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we shouldn't assume that because taking amrit may have been natural for us in our lives that it would be for everyone that wants to become a gursikh...some people have many hurdles as a result of their past karams, their environment, and even battling their minds and battling all that society has put into our heads from birth.

Marriage shouldn't come down to amritdhari or not...there should be mutual respect and understanding of each other's goals...and the spiritual goals should be similar...the partners should be committed to their own spiritual growth and that of helping each other also...if one is an amritdhari and follows rehit, then that's an area they could help the partner...if the other partner has a huge love of doing seva of sangataaan of humanity...that's an area they could help the other partner....never assume that we can't learn or be inspired by a partner who might not have taken amrit yet...

ideally, both would be amritdhari...however we don't live in an ideal world...and simply have two amritdhari partners isn't a guaranteed recipe for a happy and healthy marriage..

in response to the post above mine....we don't have the power to make anyone an amritdhari...that is something that guru ji blesses a person with...only thing we can do is work on ourselves and live in His remembrance together and do ardas for His blessings...

That was so beautifully put and so truthful as well. Ultimately, the way I see it a Sikh is a Sikh. It is true that the Khalsa have a special place in the panth. But we need to be careful because, truth be told, amritdharis of today are nothing like puratan ones. Look at the stuff they had to face. Also look at how fearless and united they generally were in dealing with it.

I think we all, amritdhari and not are not a patch on them.

I remember a sakhi about a Khalsa going to a prostitute and Guru ji standing guard outside the brothel and stopping him going in - the point was that Guru ji didn't discard him and judge him for the act but practically tried to keep him on the straight path.

Guru ji seems to have had a lot of love for the people around him. It was his concept of brotherhood that sustained the Sikhs through the hard times.

People should also remember Divan Kaura Mal, who was a mona government official who supplied the Khalsa with food and information about enemy movements.

How did the Khalsa react to him? Did they discard him as a mona and turn their back on him? NO.

The actually renamed him Mitta (sweet) Mal in gratitude for his help. So they didn't look down on him because he didn't take amrit, why can't amritdharis do this now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use