Why Do People Want Khalistan?

[Guest Dancing Warrior]

Cause, Motive and Intent totally different in both cases, there are no real parallels anybody with a balance perception can clearly see that.

[hawk13]

Right, and your point?

Are you implying that those Singhs wanted a battle, that they wanted bloodshed?

Thirty plus other gurdwareh were also attacked, so an attack on Sri Darbar Sahib was certain regardless of whether sant bhindranwale and the other singhs left. The army would've killed a bunch of innocent non-combatants, put guns in their hands and listed them off as terrorists killed (which they actually did), and thats exactly what happened through out punjab after operation blue star.

Fateh.

Even before 1984 goverment did use force in DURBAR SHAIB and GURDWARA for example in 1955 ,1959 there were no SANT JI or no armed singhs police did OPENT fire in the complex at that time there was some tension in indo-china relations in 1961 j n nehru came to AMRITSAR and appolosised as india needed sikh support the person who opened fire was SP AMRITSAR PURAN SINGH . puran singh within half hour after he fired from his.455 revolver got strange type of ailment of burning of skin and foul smell coming from the body which strated increasing onsomeone advise he was taken to durbar shaib at midnight when he appologised then he could be cured as in the firing A GURSIKH DOING ARDASS WAS MARTYED. even K SUNDERJEE died miserably of spcific ailment which makes the all body parts dead but still person remains alive in miserably this deasease affects humans rarely. In paonta shaib gurdwara 13 nihangs were martyed while akand path in1963 . Singhs by killing ati sikh people were doing a great favor to these people they were destined to die more miserably . similiarily those peole who did beadbi of GURU GRNATH SHAIB on orders of baniarawala died miseraly woman who was the main mastermind died badly and his two sons who were involed also died miserably dying bt the hands of singhs could have been easier.

Topic Closed