Jump to content

Bana Everyday


Guest gobinday
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Bana is defined when Guru Gobind Singh in Sarbloh Granth says Khalsa Mero Roop Hai Khas, The Khalsa is my True image/form. therefore a Khalsa should have the same roop as the Guru.

In Sarbloh Granth, Guru Gobind Singh also writes, 'Khalsa mera satgur poora' The Khalsa is my perfect true Guru. therefore we should decorate ourselves as Guru Gobind Singh. look at the panj pyare, did Guru Gobind Singh not decorate them, they are identical to the Guru, they are the Khalsa.

the image you showed was created in the 20th century. older drawings of sikhs show a very short bana - to the waist in front and longer in back. the kachhera are large and baggy and to the knees. the shoes are wooden sandles, juti, or no shoes are worn.

none of that is reasonable for modern life, especially for women.

modern paintings of pooran Singhnia always show a long bana, pajami, dastaar, and chunni over it, while old drawings of singhnia show long skirts (!), a very small keski at the top of the head, and a LONG chunni over the keski.

i hope people can see how it might be confusing. our modern interpretation of bana is most likely not the same thing our Guru ji wore.

hence my looking for a distinct discription.

as it is, i agree with the singhni above. to me, bana is a full dastaar and 5 k's with modest clothing. and she's right, a girl in a dastaar can be seen a mile away. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest gobinday
as a kaur i always understood khalasa mayroo roop hai khaas as in having a dastar whihc is what makes us stand out in society

u can see anyone with a datsar a mile away

i believe in wearing modest clothes and not clothes that attrack atention

we are Guru Gobind singhs jis sons/daughters

i would really like sum feedback on my views

wjkk wjkf!

wjkk wjkf, listen my sister, if you have taken amrit then you have given your head to Guru Gobind Singh and Guru Gobind Singh has given his head to you, everything that you own belongs to him and everything that the Guru owns belongs to the Guru, why wear someone elses clothes and not the Gurus clothes? his Bana. it is a Hukum to wear Bana as part of rehat, so why not follow the Guru.... follow the Guru and meet your destiny, follow your egos and meert your fate.... Satnaaam .. dastaar is very good also, but why not have the full roop as the Guru has commanded?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest gobinday
Bana is defined when Guru Gobind Singh in Sarbloh Granth says Khalsa Mero Roop Hai Khas, The Khalsa is my True image/form. therefore a Khalsa should have the same roop as the Guru.

In Sarbloh Granth, Guru Gobind Singh also writes, 'Khalsa mera satgur poora' The Khalsa is my perfect true Guru. therefore we should decorate ourselves as Guru Gobind Singh. look at the panj pyare, did Guru Gobind Singh not decorate them, they are identical to the Guru, they are the Khalsa.

the image you showed was created in the 20th century. older drawings of sikhs show a very short bana - to the waist in front and longer in back. the kachhera are large and baggy and to the knees. the shoes are wooden sandles, juti, or no shoes are worn.

none of that is reasonable for modern life, especially for women.

modern paintings of pooran Singhnia always show a long bana, pajami, dastaar, and chunni over it, while old drawings of singhnia show long skirts (!), a very small keski at the top of the head, and a LONG chunni over the keski.

i hope people can see how it might be confusing. our modern interpretation of bana is most likely not the same thing our Guru ji wore.

hence my looking for a distinct discription.

as it is, i agree with the singhni above. to me, bana is a full dastaar and 5 k's with modest clothing. and she's right, a girl in a dastaar can be seen a mile away. :)

Bana is seperate to the panj kakkars and dastaar because the Rehat says that you should complement your kes with a dhamalla, this is said seperate to Bani Bana Seva Simran. so are the panj kakkars.

actually, the oldest paintings of Guru Gobind Singh are similar to the one i just showed you, same Bana. the Nihangs keep the rehat and Bana as best they can of Guru Gobind Singh, look at their bana!

Guru Gobind Singh - 'so long as the Khalsa keeps the Niara i shall give them all of my support, but if they FOLLOW THE WAYS OF OTHERS then i shall give them no support' your following the ways of others if your wearing other clothes, yogi harbhajan khalsa came to london and grabbed a singh by the tie and said 'WHOS TIE IS THIS?!!! you decieved me when you came to me last week in bana! and now in your work place your wearing the clothes of others!'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest gobinday

Sri Singh Sahib Yogi Harbhajan Khalsa - 'religion is here to test our egos, I think that most sikhs dont want to wear bana because they want to set themselves amongst the commoners, they dont want people to identify themselves as Sikhs of the Guru, those who are blessed with Sikh Dharma and dont want to share it with others, we dont need you and you dont need us, get out!, clear it out!

ok jasleen kaur, you can wear your bosses tie at work because you belong to your boss, ill wear the Gurus Bana because i belong to the Guru.

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest gobinday
Bana is defined when Guru Gobind Singh in Sarbloh Granth says Khalsa Mero Roop Hai Khas, The Khalsa is my True image/form. therefore a Khalsa should have the same roop as the Guru.

In Sarbloh Granth, Guru Gobind Singh also writes, 'Khalsa mera satgur poora' The Khalsa is my perfect true Guru. therefore we should decorate ourselves as Guru Gobind Singh. look at the panj pyare, did Guru Gobind Singh not decorate them, they are identical to the Guru, they are the Khalsa.

the image you showed was created in the 20th century. older drawings of sikhs show a very short bana - to the waist in front and longer in back. the kachhera are large and baggy and to the knees. the shoes are wooden sandles, juti, or no shoes are worn.

none of that is reasonable for modern life, especially for women.

modern paintings of pooran Singhnia always show a long bana, pajami, dastaar, and chunni over it, while old drawings of singhnia show long skirts (!), a very small keski at the top of the head, and a LONG chunni over the keski.

i hope people can see how it might be confusing. our modern interpretation of bana is most likely not the same thing our Guru ji wore.

hence my looking for a distinct discription.

as it is, i agree with the singhni above. to me, bana is a full dastaar and 5 k's with modest clothing. and she's right, a girl in a dastaar can be seen a mile away. :)

the Bana that nihangs keep is the Bana of Guru Gobind Singh, it has been kept since 1699, the only difference between now and then is that it used to be laced with gold and it was done up with strings on the side, now it has buttons on the front, the Bana has been kept for all this time, so many have given their lives, so many Singh and Singhnia have given their lives for this Bana! its drenched in the blood of or shaheeds! why not wear such Bana? so many died so you can wear this Niara today, Guru Gobind Singh himself worked through them. Sikh Dharma shall flourish with or without you and the Khalsa shall rule the earth! Sri Singh Sahib Yogi Harbhajan Khalsa - 'Bana are the clothes of the future'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Mind is Jyot Saroop (Waheguru), but the mind is under the influence of five evils… Through Naam Simran( Rememberance), the mind will begin to detach from evil, and get back to its original form ( MANN TU JYOT SAROOP HEH)… Until the mind breaks free from the five evils, one will go through the cycle of paap and punn….which leads to Karma… Naam Simran destroys past karma, and prevents new karma coming into fruition… I did this, I did that… This non realisation of the Jyot Saroop gives rise to paap and Punn, which in turn gives birth to suffering and misery…
    • I agree we're not born with sin like the Christians think. Also I agree we have effects of karma. But Gurbani does state that the body contains both sin and charity (goodness): ਕਾਇਆ ਅੰਦਰਿ ਪਾਪੁ ਪੁੰਨੁ ਦੁਇ ਭਾਈ ॥ Within the body are the two brothers sin and virtue. p126 Actually, we do need to be saved. Gurbani calls this "udhaar" (uplift). Without Satguru, souls are liable to spiritual death: ਜਿਨਾ ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨ ਭੇਟਿਓ ਸੇ ਭਾਗਹੀਣ ਵਸਿ ਕਾਲ ॥ p40 Those who have not met Satguru Purakh are unfortunate and liable to death. So, yeah, we do need to be saved, and Guru ji does the saving. The reason Satguru is the one to save is because God has given Satguru the "key" (kunji): ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਹਥਿ ਕੁੰਜੀ ਹੋਰਤੁ ਦਰੁ ਖੁਲੈ ਨਾਹੀ ਗੁਰੁ ਪੂਰੈ ਭਾਗਿ ਮਿਲਾਵਣਿਆ ॥੭॥ In the True Guru's hand is the key. None else can open the door. By perfect good fortune the Guru is met. p124
    • That's unfortunate to hear. Could you give any more information? Who was this "baba"? He just disappeared with people's money? Obviously, you should donate your money to known institutions or poor people that you can verify the need of through friends and family in Punjab.
    • Sangat ji,  I know a family who went Sevewal to do seva sometimes end of 2019. They returned last year in great dismay and heart broken.  To repent for their mistakes they approached panj pyaare. The Panj gave them their punishment / order to how t make it up which, with Kirpa, they fulfilled.  They were listening to a fake Baba who, in the end, took all the "Donations " and fled sometime over a year ago. For nearly 4 years this family (who are great Gursikhs once u get to know them) wasted time and effort for this fake Baba. NOT ONLY this one fam. But many, many did worldwide and they took their fam to do seva, in village Sevewal, city Jaitho in Punjab. In the end many families lost money in thousands being behind this Baba. The family, on return, had to get in touch with all the participants and told them to stop.  I am stating this here to create awareness and we need to learn from whom we follow and believe. It's no easy but if we follow the 3 S (Sangat, Simran and Seva) we will be shown the light. As I am writing this the family in question have been doing the same since 2008 onwards and they fell for this Baba... it is unbelievable and shocking.  This am writing in a nutshell as am at work on my break so not lengthy but it deserves a great length.  Especially the family in question, who shed light on youngsters about Sikhi 20 plus years!! 
    • Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi Kalan uses simple Punjabi.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use