Jump to content

Dr Zakir Naik


fatehe
 Share

Recommended Posts

The bhavishya purana seems interesting..

I agree with Chatanga, it is merely the way he recites the "page number x verse number y line z" that tends to amaze everyone or shut the opposition up or make them look inferior to him..

Anything sited from memory, especially when biasing it towards your own belief, has very a high potential of being flawed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

becos he has a very good memery. now i would put it down to him saying anything that LOOKS impressive, ie quoting soemthing that majority of us wudnt know is true or false, but at the same time thinking wow, he could remember that???!!!!

what if you do your own research and you find what his translating is correct.

in that case, ford capri, you agree wiv him while violently doing wheel-spins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DR zakir naik gets some things right, but some things wrong.

Im sure he gets the stuff on islam correct ( i think), but i know for a fact he doesnt know much about sikhism and hinduism.

He makes his own interpretation. Like the time when he claims that Hinduism predicted the coming of the prophet mohammed. He once said that in hinduism , prophet muhammed was reffered to as the Kalki avtar, thus proving that hinduism predicted the coming of the prophet within its own scriptures.

But we all know this to be false, because he got the time frame totally wrong.

The supposed kalki avtar came to this world and left way way before islam came about.

We're talkin about some thousands of years apart according to hiduism. So DR zakir naik got the time frame completely wrong. I think kalki avtar is also mentioned in chaubis avtar??

But my point is that it seems like dr zakir naik just googles half his material on other religions. he gets the quotes and page refferences then recites them like a zombie , in addition putting his own interpretation onto it which is not allways correct...as I have just proven.

But its amusing the way he argues and allways makes people think hes right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DR zakir naik gets some things right, but some things wrong.

Im sure he gets the stuff on islam correct ( i think), but i know for a fact he doesnt know much about sikhism and hinduism.

Nah, most Muslims I know dislike him because he makes up his own things about Islam too. On one Islamic forum, users are banned from mentioning his name lol.

He gets publicity from his own TV station which is free to air in many countries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use