Jump to content

CHEW ON THIS


Simran9
 Share

Recommended Posts

japmans veerji,

i think wat the peta organisation and the sangat was tryin to say (like mkhalsa) that its ok to have milk... but the cows should be treated properly... not inhumanely... u know what i mean? if cows r treated with the respect that living creatures deserve, then they have a god-given gift of offering milk to people for survival...

just my thoughts pls forgive me if i said nething wrong

:umm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

japmans veerji,

i think wat the peta organisation and the sangat was tryin to say (like mkhalsa) that its ok to have milk... but the cows should be treated properly... not inhumanely... u know what i mean? if cows r treated with the respect that living creatures deserve, then they have a god-given gift of offering milk to people for survival...

just my thoughts pls forgive me if i said nething wrong

:umm:

hmmm.... if they would treat the cows any better, why would they butcher them afterwards to prepare them for meat purposes.

I dont think it will ever make sense to them about butchering or treating animals. Once a cows milk is no good anymore, they find its meat is. SOOO WRONGGG!!! :D @

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the cruelty on cows starts from the very begining when we keep umm tied for 24/7 against her wishes.Every animal has a right to be free.Why do we keep umm tied 24/7 just for our need "MILK"?

I think keeping cows(no matter how u treat umm......people in villages who keep cows and milk umm nicely .....beat them brutally most of the time) is unnatural.Same way keeping horses is also unnatural.Everyone shud be freeeee.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest mehtab

i love that story of Guru Nanak Dev Jee when He used to graze the cows/cattles and would affectionately rub them rather than others who beat them with sticks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waheguroo Jee Ka Khalsa!

Waheguroo Jee Kee Fateh!!

Nice movie indeed

Here in Sweden - they've made it confortable for cows - so tha the go and get themselfs milked whenever they feel they need it - the simply go to the machines -

seems like its good doens't it?

bhull chukk maaf

GurFateh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll leave the Singh anonymous in this but he told me this:

Milk is called "Amrit" in Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji:

pasoo mileh chang-aa-ee-aa kharh khaaveh amrit deh.

naam vihoonay aadmee Dharig jeevan karam karayhi. ||3||

Even beasts have value, as they eat grass (Kharh) and give Amrit

(milk).

Without the Naam, the mortal`s life is cursed, as are the actions he

performs. ||3||

meat is flesh, although ppl argue that milk is product of animal, it is not flesh so it's not meat. it comes down to how cows are treated in dairy farms. many are cruel. :D

if we drink milk should we feel guilty that the cow was abused for it? it's not our fault, is it? :umm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll leave the Singh anonymous in this but he told me this:
Milk is called "Amrit" in Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji:

pasoo mileh chang-aa-ee-aa kharh khaaveh amrit deh.

naam vihoonay aadmee Dharig jeevan karam karayhi. ||3||

Even beasts have value, as they eat grass (Kharh) and give Amrit

(milk).

Without the Naam, the mortal`s life is cursed, as are the actions he

performs. ||3||

meat is flesh, although ppl argue that milk is product of animal, it is not flesh so it's not meat. it comes down to how cows are treated in dairy farms. many are cruel. :D

if we drink milk should we feel guilty that the cow was abused for it? it's not our fault, is it? :umm:

I think conditions are changing

and still if the Cows arn

9;t milked -theyt'll suffer as well!

bhull chukk maf

GurFAteh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use