Jump to content

Anti Dasam Granth Brigade Coming To Bay Area--watch


Inder Singh
 Share

Recommended Posts

I called the pizza parlour franchise owner and headquarters and they both confirmed that there was NO discussion, seminar or information session ever held at any of their locations. The venue was voluntarily shifted to another larger location once the speakers became aware of the nature of location

Why do not you say that fearing massive protests gang of Jeonwala has run away. The fact is that they realized they have no presence in US and have run away abandoning the programme.

This is the first sikh victory against panth dokhis. Rats have run for their holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Is prof. Darshan Singh not Amritdhari? He is ex-Jathedar of Akal Takhat. He does do his Nitnem. He does not drink. As a matter of fact he preaches against it using Gurbani. One group's naam simran definition is different from another's.

lols

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went Hazoor sahib this summer nearly all the gurudwara had dasam granth prakash (thats how it should be). I also went to mehta chownk to damdami taksal(bhinderan) and there was dsamgranth prakash there. so what im trying to say is that the dasam granth is inseperable and there is no need do debates as there was no need before. those want to depbate they must believe that they know more than mahapursh like Sant Jarnail Singh, and Singh Sahib Jathedar Kulwant singh and also the Puratan singhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went Hazoor sahib this summer nearly all the gurudwara had dasam granth prakash (thats how it should be). I also went to mehta chownk to damdami taksal(bhinderan) and there was dsamgranth prakash there. so what im trying to say is that the dasam granth is inseperable and there is no need do debates as there was no need before. those want to depbate they must believe that they know more than mahapursh like Sant Jarnail Singh, and Singh Sahib Jathedar Kulwant singh and also the Puratan singhs.

Do so called Mahanpursh know more than Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji?

Did Guru Gobind Singh ji know more than these so called mahanpursh and installed Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji as the only Guru and guide for all beings and not even mention about 'his' own so called 'Dasam Granth'.

Don't tell me that Baba Thakur Singh was also one of these Mahanpursh who LIED to Sikhs all over the world for nearly 21 years about Baba Jarnail Singh was alive.

Admin: Note: First Warning given. Read Forum Rules & Guidlines, section: Dasam Granth Sahib & Dis-respecting sikh saints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody has ever been able to present anything negative from Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji and break people away from Sikhism. But there are so many parts that people need answers for from Dasam Granth.

This is so not true!

The fact is there are many, many lines from Guru Granth Sahib Ji which on first glance are promoting the Hindu or Brahmin philosophy. You need to go deeper into meanings and set up a interpretational framework to be able to derive meanings of Gurbani.

I don't have the time to give all such quotes from Gurbani, but anyone who has read Bani is familiar with them. Let's not go to afar, just look in Japji Sahib. Is Guru Nanak Dev ji calling Isar, Gorakh, Brahma, and Parbati Mai Gurus that we are to be Sikhs of? Is Guru Ji saying Ram Chander of Ayodya dwells within the hearts of those in the upper spiritual realms (khands)? When Guru Nanak Dev ji says that Krishan did such and such of a deed in the forest Bindraban, is Guru ji encouraging such actions?

Your answer will likely be "No, you're using the wrong meanings of Bani. If you use the right meanings, what you see as Brahminical will look like Gurmat." Exactly. But: use the same approach for Dasam Granth.

Here is a link in which Vijaydeep Singh details all sorts of quotes from Gurbani regarding Hindu mythology.

http://www.sikhphilosophy.net/dasam-granth/25492-answering-doubts-dalbeer-singh-ji-regarding.html

If you take the view that simply using Hindu myths to make a point is bad, then you'll have to reject Guru Granth Sahib ji at some point. The logic naturally leads to such a conclusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really want to define rats, well here is additional information for your kind of `Sikhs`. I got the word a few minute ago, that your so called Dasam Granthi Sikhs actually paid a drug dealer and a convicted criminal to carry out a hit on a seminar attendee in Edmonton, Alberta a day after the seminar was held. His crime, well he questioned these Dasam Granth supporters about their stand of supporting the Granth even without reading it. Well I guess your side does follow what is taught in some of the Chritars in the Granth.

If true, this is regrettable. I encourage you to ascertain the details of the matter.

I would caution you against inferring that the Dasam Granth is invalid due to the zealotry of its supporters. It should be noted that supporters of Guru Granth Sahib (that sounds weird, sorry) are similarly zealous. For example, you may have heard that some people killed Seonwala after he wrote in the Spokesman that Guru Granth Sahib didn't receive the Gurgaddi. (By that token, "Guru" Granth Sahib is a misnomer. Should we say "Bhai" Granth Sahib ji instead?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really want to define rats, well here is additional information for your kind of `Sikhs`. I got the word a few minute ago, that your so called Dasam Granthi Sikhs actually paid a drug dealer and a convicted criminal to carry out a hit on a seminar attendee in Edmonton, Alberta a day after the seminar was held. His crime, well he questioned these Dasam Granth supporters about their stand of supporting the Granth even without reading it. Well I guess your side does follow what is taught in some of the Chritars in the Granth.

If true, this is regrettable. I encourage you to ascertain the details of the matter.

I would caution you against inferring that the Dasam Granth is invalid due to the zealotry of its supporters. It should be noted that supporters of Guru Granth Sahib (that sounds weird, sorry) are similarly zealous. For example, you may have heard that some people killed Seonwala after he wrote in the Spokesman that Guru Granth Sahib didn't receive the Gurgaddi. (By that token, "Guru" Granth Sahib is a misnomer. Should we say "Bhai" Granth Sahib ji instead?)

These people are not supporters of SGGS also. They are communist thugs who have infiltrated sikhism and promoting their athiest theory. Peole like joenwala are no sikhs at all. They are agendst iof invisible forces.

You know they are preparing their own Rehat maryada where there will be no amrit, no bnais of tenth amster, no Bhai gurdas ji di vaar and no Bhai nana dlal ji di varan.

They are outcast as per sikhism is concerned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use