Nanaksahi Calendar

[Inder Singh]

I read that purewal was a factory worker in Canada and has no knowledge about astronomy at all.How come this man could devise a calender?

[BhForce]

and bhforce, guru nanak isnt going to fax a calendar from heaven so ultimately some human is gonna produce it.

I will ignore your irreverent tone for now and agree that a calendar is going to be produced by a man (since it wasn't created by Guru). That's why the calendar is named after the man. Pope Gregory's calendar, Julius's calendar, Er Purewal's calendar.

If sant Samaj is okay with a Hindu Calendar prepared by Hindus, then it look really stupid and ignorant to oppose Hindu Sages like Ashutosh in Punjab.

That's neither here nor there. Both the Sant Smaj and Ashutosh use kilometers to mark distance, which is a unit of measure devised by a Catholic Frenchman, and the km markings on the roads in Punjab are presumably marked off by Hindu workers from Bihar. Depending on what country you live in you either use kilometers or miles, both devised by Christians.

The Bikrami calendar is not the "Hindu calendar". The Hindu calendar begins in the year 3102 before Jesus. The Bikrami calendar begins in the year 56 before Jesus.

[apnepart2]

lol!

http://www.bbc.co.uk...anakshahi.shtml

Sikh calendar

The Sikh calendar is called the Nanakshahi Calendar and takes its name from Guru Nanak, who founded Sikhism.

For most of its history Sikhism has used the traditional Vikrami (or Bikrami) calendar, shared by Sikhs and Hindus in North India, to set the date of its festivals. The Nanakshahi Calendar was adopted in 2003 and made life much easier for Sikhs as their holy days no longer move about the calendar from year to year. Gurpurabs (celebrations devoted to particular Gurus) now always happen on the same date, and occur once (and once only) in every year.

The calendar didn't fix the date of all Sikh festivals. Those Sikh festivals that are celebrated at the same time as similar Hindu religious events, such as Diwali and Hola Mohalla, still have their dates set by the Vikrami calendar.

The Nanakshahi Calendar was developed by a Canadian Sikh, Pal Singh Purewal, a retired computer engineer. He started work on the calendar in the 1960s. Purewal believed that having a unique calendar was vital for the integrity of the Sikh religion.

All communities and faiths have their own calendar as a mark of their distinct cultural identity. Just as the Islamic world has the Hijri calendar and Hindus have Vikrami calendar, the Sikhs will have a Nanakshahi calendar along with the common era (CE) calendar which is in use throughout the world.

Pal Singh Purewal

The Nanakshahi calendar in brief

• a solar calendar
• called Nanakshahi after Guru Nanak (founder of Sikhism)
• year one is the year of Guru Nanak's birth (1469 CE)
• uses most of the mechanics of the Western calendar
• year length is same as Western calendar (365 days 5 hours 48 minutes 45 seconds)
• contains 5 months of 31 days followed by 7 months of 30 days
• leap year every 4 years in which the last month (Phagun) has an extra day

Political history of the calendar

The implementation of the calendar was approved unanimously by leading Sikh organisations in March 2003.

The first attempt to introduce the Nanakshahi calendar was in 1999 but it was almost immediately banned.

The two institutions that rule Sikhism were on opposite sides. The Shiromani Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee or SGPC (the top Sikh religious institution) implemented the Nanakshahi calendar in December 1999, despite an order from the Akal Takht (the other top religious and legal institution in Sikhism) that the calendar should not be implemented until a general consensus emerged on the issue within the Sikh community.

The SGPC decided that an important festival should be celebrated on January 5, the date given by the new calendar, while the Akal Takht insisted that the it should be on January 14, the date in the traditional calendar.

The showdown resulted in temporary victory for the Akal Takht. The SGPC backed down, senior SGPC officials suffered various religious punishments, and a top SGPC official was excommunicated.

Ordinary Sikhs were left in utter confusion and for the next few years some followed the lunar calendar (Vikrami or Bikrami) while others used the solar calendar (Nanakshahi).

Views on the calendar

The arguments about the calendar were concerned not only with its accuracy but also the identity and status of Sikhism and the Sikh community within Hindu-majority India.

Traditional Sikhs opposed the change because it broke with the past, but Sikh radicals supported it because it gave Sikhs their own calendar and emphasised their separate identity from Hindus.

Some people pointed out that most religions base their calendars on the movements of the moon, and not that of the sun, that this was somehow more spiritual, and so a Sikh religious calendar should also follow the moon.

Others argued that the new calendar wasn't really Sikh at all, but was just a "solarised" version of the Hindu calendar or a version of the Western calendar with added Sikh elements.

Some politicians pointed out that the old Vikrami calendar, and the sharing of some Hindu and Sikh festivals, was one of the few elements of Punjab culture that had survived the growing breakdown between the Sikh and Hindu communities in North India. But other politicians, anxious to establish the separateness of the Sikh community, supported the new calendar as another pillar of Sikh identity.

Moderate Sikhs were anxious about anything that might cause trouble between Sikhs and Hindus in the hothouse atmosphere of Indian communal relations, particularly in the Sikh heartland of the Punjab.

IMO it all depends upon which side you are and wherther and how much you can sway the pendulum.

[BhForce]

lol!

Care to share?

[apnepart2]

gussa na ho veere.

[BhForce]

Your first post was just "lol", then you went back and edited it to add the BBC article. That's why I was asking you to share what was funny.

Anyway, the BBC article is basically a summary of arguments on both sides, like most news articles are.

Go ahead and make your own arguments and respond to the ones above.