Jump to content

Khalistan

soorma18

By soorma18,
in POLITICS | LIFESTYLE

 Share

  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. If Khalistan was given to sikhs,would you move there?


Recommended Posts

BhaiSukhSingh Grand Master

BhaiSukhSingh

Posted
Posted

VaheGuruJeKaKhalsaVaheGuruJeKeFeath

ye we all move to Khalastan but we wouldnt move to india hmmmmmmmmmmmmm how we gonna get khalistan when we 1000s of miles away how we gonna luk after our bros n sis when we 1000s miles away ever yr we shout KHALASTAN ZINABAD in london than we get on with our 9-5s and forget

Lets get Iktha bak in the panth before we get Khalsatan coz if we do get it and theres no Ikhta we will be killing one another for control

VaheGuruJeKaKhalsaVaheGuruJeKeFeath

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MokhamSingh Grand Master

MokhamSingh

Posted
Posted

If Punjab gained independence from India and became Khalistan will there be another sikh holocaust? What will be fate of Sikhs outside Punjab? Will it be another Pakistan/India style partition where one million lives were lost? Sikhs will be asked to give up their Sardari if they wish to retain their property outside of Punjab. Sikhs will have to adopt Hinduism if they want to stay in" Hindustan". Will there be enough work , land , economic opportunities for all the Sikhs who will be forced to leave India?

I am an Amritdhari Sikh and I am going to say something that may offend some people , so I apologise in advance.

As Sikhs we can't even run a Gurdwara committee together let alone a country. I am not criticising any commitee member , I am criticising myself for not being able to accept all the terms and condtions of a particular committee.

The non-Punjabi Sikhs in India are content in living in India. They are a prosperous community. There is good social cohesion between themselves and other communities. They are outside Punjab since Punjab cannot accommodate all ecomomic opportunities.

With regards to injustices being done to Sikhs in Punjab/India I feel they will always exist. Indians wanted to get rid of the British Raj. Did injustice/corruption/holocausts cease after indepence from British?

The actions of NRI Sikhs in the west have a direct bearing on the Sikhs in India. When sweets were distributed and champagne was being consumed by Sardars in the UK after Indra's death , this was one of the points highlighted for the Sikh massacre.

Before this post errupts into a massive nasty fight I humbly touch the feet of all the Sangat here and ask for forgiveness but I still want to say that anyone in favour of partition should live in Punjab/India amongst the ordinary people and get a feel of the suffering they will have to go through.

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest PunjabSingh

Guest PunjabSingh

Posted
Posted

If Punjab gained independence from India and became Khalistan will there be another sikh holocaust? What will be fate of Sikhs outside Punjab? Will it be another Pakistan/India style partition where one million lives were lost? Sikhs will be asked to give up their Sardari if they wish to retain their property outside of Punjab. Sikhs will have to adopt Hinduism if they want to stay in" Hindustan". Will there be enough work , land , economic opportunities for all the Sikhs who will be forced to leave India?

I am an Amritdhari Sikh and I am going to say something that may offend some people , so I apologise in advance.

As Sikhs we can't even run a Gurdwara committee together let alone a country. I am not criticising any commitee member , I am criticising myself for not being able to accept all the terms and condtions of a particular committee.

The non-Punjabi Sikhs in India are content in living in India. They are a prosperous community. There is good social cohesion between themselves and other communities. They are outside Punjab since Punjab cannot accommodate all ecomomic opportunities.

With regards to injustices being done to Sikhs in Punjab/India I feel they will always exist. Indians wanted to get rid of the British Raj. Did injustice/corruption/holocausts cease after indepence from British?

The actions of NRI Sikhs in the west have a direct bearing on the Sikhs in India. When sweets were distributed and champagne was being consumed by Sardars in the UK after Indra's death , this was one of the points highlighted for the Sikh massacre.

Before this post errupts into a massive nasty fight I humbly touch the feet of all the Sangat here and ask for forgiveness but I still want to say that anyone in favour of partition should live in Punjab/India amongst the ordinary people and get a feel of the suffering they will have to go through.

It seems you are one of those who is afraid of the word "Khalistan" or have some misconceptions of Khalistan.

Had Pakistan or India thought like you they would have been slaves under England even today.

All your questions are answered in the following interviews with Mr Maan.Go to the following page and then to "Sikh maslay daa hal Khalistan" ,then download and watch all the 4 videos :

http://akalidalamrit...PartyVideos.asp

Mr Maan dee soch aam Sikhaan naalo 20 saal agay hai.He's a gold medalist in History and stood 4th in All India IPS exam.Some people may be still laughing at Mr Maan's support of Khalistan but they should watch the above interviews to clear their doubts.

These days states don't get independence by large scale violence as it happened in 1947.He gives example of Kosovo which is a landlocked country carved out from Yugoslavia just recently and is a "no fly zone" .Remember if Punjab remains as it is and India Pak go to a nuclear war Sikhs will be finished and will suffer the most in Punjab.If it is declared a "No fly zone" no bomber aircraft will be able to fly over Khalistan.

Then he gives example of Israel while referring to Sikh NRIs.Most of the jews live outside Israel particularly in USA than in Israel itself but whenever any jew wants he can reach Israel,pick up the gun and fight for his country Israel.

Every Sikh should know that we are slaves in Punjab and India and then should think about how to remove this slavery.We should not feel shy or afraid of mentioning "Khalistan" .Even Supreme court of India has said that it is not a crime to use the word "Khalistan" .

SAD Amritsar(Mann) and SAD Amritsar(Panch pradhani) are the future of Khalistan.

SAD Amritsar(Panch pradhani) consists of former jhujharoos who took part in the armed struggle where as SAD Amritsar(Mann) believes in achieving Khalistan but not in the kharkoo way.

We must remember that even during India's independence there were 2 groups : extremists and moderates.In Khalistan struggle none of the above is moderate but SAD Amritsar(Mann) is relatively moderate.

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
West London Singh Grand Master

West London Singh

Posted
Posted
As Sikhs we can't even run a Gurdwara committee together let alone a country

Thats irrelevent. I mean, the British can't run trains in fall because the wrong type of leaves fall on the tracks....can't run tains in winter because of the wrong type of snow....their guns won't work in the Iraqi desert because of the wronng type of sand.....their helicopters won't fly in the Iraqi summer heat because its the wrong type of heat.....their new showpiece bridges have to be closed 30 mins after opening because they're wobbly. And yet....they can run three quarters of the entire world. Self determination is a basic human right.

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest PunjabSingh

Guest PunjabSingh

Posted
Posted

Watch these sites daily and you'll know where we are heading in Punjab so far as Khalistan is concerned :

http://www.sikhsiyasat.com/

http://www.punjabnewsnetwork.com/

http://www.akalidalamritsar.net/

http://www.sadamritsar.com/

Dont believe in Indian media as it totally ignores any news relating to self determination of the Sikhs

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BhForce
      Child marriage questions

      By BhForce · Posted

      Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • BhForce
      Starched Turbans - Topi Or Not Topi

      By BhForce · Posted

      You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • BhForce
      Starched Turbans - Topi Or Not Topi

      By BhForce · Posted

      You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • BhForce
      Kissing in public

      By BhForce · Posted

      The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
    • MokhamSingh
      LARIVAAR SUNDAR GUTKA

      By MokhamSingh · Posted

      The printer is C J Amritsar… They have given a mobile number for India …
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use

  I accept