Jump to content

Sikh Research Institution


Recommended Posts

yeah i personally know ppl who went to Saanjh a year or two ago, and found out that maharaj ji was being carried around in a teaichii, being rolled around on the ground

Fremont Gurdwara a little while back made an attempt to install SikhRI's Sojhi syllabus in our punjabi school, but parents, teachers, sangat, all joined together to point out the numerous fallacies in the syllabus. with maharaj's kirpa sojhi was removed and hopefully will not be reinstalled. these are the same people affiliated and in support of darsho professor and others who oppose age old sikh traditions, dilluting sikhi until there's nothing of significance left

a singh, one of the couple that went to saanjh and saw the beadbi of maharaj there, noted that many of SikhRI's standards, and their Sojhi syllabus, are nearly identical to those created by bhasaurhia and his cult.

keep it real.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

such people as Harinder singh of sikhri by doing the utmost beadbi carrying SGGS in a suitcase - need to beat up to pulp and their head shoved up their own <banned word filter activated> - this <banned word filter activated> is in the uk doing talks in southall - anyone up for game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I attended a SikhRI course called something along the lines of 'Becoming an Activist' a couple of years ago and was very impressed at Harinder Singhs fresh outlook and ability to get you to think about things we normally don't think about. He was also on BBC Asian Radio a few days ago talking about 1984 where he impressed me again with his intellectual abilities and knowledge.

Co-incidently I was just listening to Harinder Singh on Youtube right now - See:

- Have a look for yourself and see for yourself the sort of talks he does.

Many posters make many accusations against him and SikhRI, I have not heard anything Anti-Gurmat from him myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone is entitled to there own views, however if these go against gurmat then it's an issue for the panth. Singh moderator on sikhsangat has stated issues with sikhri, I'm sure he isn't lying and so have many others. If we havnt heard anything yet, it's probably because he is new here and wants a following before the crap cones out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tera,

Read this, and if you are in claifornia then i will put you in touch with a person who will tell you whats wrong with this person's ideology and how creepy this guy is. You know people keep saying.. it doesn't take rocket scientist to figure it out but in this case it really takes a naam abiyaasi person to figure out what this guy is upto. Meanwhile, read the above link as i posted and contact him to get the answers to questions that Californian sangat been trying to ask him for years and he always dodging em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please don't take me wrong, I am not saying that the comments/accusations people have against sikhri may not be valid, but I think we need to make sure that these are infact true and not interpretations of smaller things and results of personal vendettas which commonly occur nowadays in local communities to put other who are on the opposite 'party' down.

Can people making these claims please validate these for the benefit of the sangat?

Any pics of them taking GGSji in a suitcase or serving meat in camps?

It might be an idea to email Harinder Singh directly and get these things clarified?

I have heard him speak a few times and cannot think of any examples of him saying anything controversial. That's my personal view, but obviously thats not enough to say that the concerns of other people are not valid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

USA ia a large country and sikhs are scattered all over and not confined in pockets. Why one should have enemity with harinder singh as he lives in San antonio Texas , aplace about 1500 miles from Califiornia where i live.

They do not consider SGGS as a Guru eternal.That is the reason they carry Guru sahib in siutcase.That is the reason they changed Dohra,

The following is about their syllabus

The “Sojhi” syllabus stresses that Guru Granth Sahib is not the physical form of the Guru and that calling Guru Granth Sahib Ji the physical body of the Guru is equivalent to “idol worship.” It further states that it is inappropriate and “wrong” to do bhog for Guru Granth Sahib. In a 2nd grade chapter about Guru Arjan Dev Ji and Adi Granth, the syllabus mentions that “Granth” means “book” and then mentions that “The book itself is not my King”. This is a dangerous trend and needs to be stopped.

It is unfortunate that Sojhi takes the stance of presenting their Dohra lesson in a way that is inconsistent with Sikh history. It is also contradictory to the Dohra currently being recited at Sri Akal Takhat Sahib and other Gurdwaras.

unquote

They are ex Fateh and they were serving meat at camps. Ask Harinder yourself if he takes meat and recommend its consumption.

Moreover this thug opposes Dasam Granth sahib and when goes to india takes help from those academics who stand for Dasam granth pretending he is with them. This is thuggery. His love for panth and its traditions and not the way he speaks English should be our concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use