Jump to content

Hindus Challenging Originality Of Sikhism


Recommended Posts

Raam was not added to the line of avtaars of Vishnu until 11th century and his bhagtee did not become popular until Ramanand Vaishnav. In the light of these facts accepting Raam as an avtaar is fallacious. Guru Sahib has used many metaphors in Bachittar Natak. In fact the very name of this literature should make us think why it was called Bachittar and Natak. Taking everything literally will misguide us and we end up building a Gurdwara in some mountain.

Bigla Ji I respect your knowledge which is more then I can only dream of, but here you are way out of line.

The simple tukh in Akaal Ustat : Ram Chandra Krishan kay avatar be anake hey. Should be enough to clear any doubts that

there was a Sri Ram Chandra Ji and Guru Ji acknowledged it, but said that for a Sikh they should obviously be respected, but have

no relevence .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ram Chander is a imaginary character of a literature written by Balmiki called ramayan.

Brother, Dasam Pita has written in detail about Rama Avtar. We should look to our father firstly for knowledge. Guru Ji has certainly not deemed Bhagwan Ji to be imaginary. Thats good enough for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rolleyes.gifIF SOMEONE SAYS THAT "SIKHISM" IS A SECT OF HINDUISM..

THEN EVEN MUSLIMS CAN SAY THAT ITS A PART OF ISLAM..

AS THE 1ST GURU HAS SPENT HIS LIFE WITH BOTH HINDU AND MUSLIMS..

smile.gif

Sahib Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji spread the message of truth to whoever He found burning in the fire of falsehood. That does not mean His teachings were borrowed from any other religion. In order to teach them He had to spend time with them. And with all due respect, we don't bother what anyone has to say about Sikhi without reading a single Ang of Gurbani with proper understanding of the meaning :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes sikhi is different to Sanatan Dharma and would RSS Hindus like to know why?

Here's the reason taken from their own scriptures:

In the BHAVEKHATH PURANA "Baavekhath" means "future foretelling". There are numerous places in this famous Hindu epic where the advant of Guru NANAK is directly alluded to. These instances are listed hereunder -

"Guru thaa Brahma, Guru raa Vishnu, Guru raa dev maheshra saakhyaar Parbrehem Thasmei NANAK nameh" meaning

"The Guru of the prophets, Brahma, Vishnu and Shiv ji is God almighty himself. This very Creator will manifest itself as a human, in the form of one whose name will be
NANAK

I think this answers most questions in the article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes sikhi is different to Sanatan Dharma and would RSS Hindus like to know why?

Here's the reason taken from their own scriptures:

In the BHAVEKHATH PURANA "Baavekhath" means "future foretelling". There are numerous places in this famous Hindu epic where the advant of Guru NANAK is directly alluded to. These instances are listed hereunder -

"Guru thaa Brahma, Guru raa Vishnu, Guru raa dev maheshra saakhyaar Parbrehem Thasmei NANAK nameh" meaning

"The Guru of the prophets, Brahma, Vishnu and Shiv ji is God almighty himself. This very Creator will manifest itself as a human, in the form of one whose name will be
NANAK

I think this answers most questions in the article.

ARE YOU SERIOUS ?unsure.gif ITS SO HARD TO BELIEVE THAT ITS WRITTEN IN A HINDU BOOK !

SOURCE PLEASE ? sleep.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.earthport...nger/nanak.html

or

http://www.scribd.co...rs-09-GuruNanak

Read pages 2 and 3

or google Bhavekhath purana and loads will come up. This isn't the only prediction in the puranas, others can be found in the Rig Veda, Vishnu Purana, Yujar veda, Dhigvajeh Purana and the sage Patanjali says abit aswell. Thinking about it though I'm not sure how much of it's genuine so i'm gna delve into it abit. If anyone can let me know for sure if these are true then i'd appreciate it, I stumbled acoss these websites a few days ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest amar_jkp

Brother, Dasam Pita has written in detail about Rama Avtar. We should look to our father firstly for knowledge. Guru Ji has certainly not deemed Bhagwan Ji to be imaginary. Thats good enough for me.

Veere, Guru Sahib Ji wrote about famous mythlogical charater it doesn't mean Ram existed. Truth its just a literature whose main charater is Ram and where Guru Sahib ji said that Ram really existed ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sanathan means Timeless. Which is the essence of Sikhi Dharma. “Hind” “Hindu” etc is a title based on a people and place labelled by geographical matter i.e the people of Hind…Nobody started a “Hindu” religion, no Devi or Devtha or any other demi gods ever claimed to be a “Hindu”..........and .......people need to get hobbies some pple spend too much time on here!!

Brother, Dasam Pita has written in detail about Rama Avtar. We should look to our father firstly for knowledge. Guru Ji has certainly not deemed Bhagwan Ji to be imaginary. Thats good enough for me.

Too right!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bijla Singh Stated "

"Taking everything literally will misguide us and we end up building a Gurdwara in some mountain."

Dude that's blasphemy

"Taking everything literally will misguide us and we end up building a Gurdwara in some mountain"

You're referring to "DustDaman" and "Sri Hemkunt Sahib"

you have clearly overstepped the mark! blinded by your own Muth and False ego! Shame

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Veere, Guru Sahib Ji wrote about famous mythlogical charater it doesn't mean Ram existed. Truth its just a literature whose main charater is Ram and where Guru Sahib ji said that Ram really existed ?

It also does not mean that he did not exist. Gurbani of SGGS ji says that these avtars came to this earth with Hukam of Akal Purakh.

It is another thing what they did here.

http://www.earthport...nger/nanak.html

or

http://www.scribd.co...rs-09-GuruNanak

Read pages 2 and 3

or google Bhavekhath purana and loads will come up. This isn't the only prediction in the puranas, others can be found in the Rig Veda, Vishnu Purana, Yujar veda, Dhigvajeh Purana and the sage Patanjali says abit aswell. Thinking about it though I'm not sure how much of it's genuine so i'm gna delve into it abit. If anyone can let me know for sure if these are true then i'd appreciate it, I stumbled acoss these websites a few days ago.

I have read the link. The author is unknown. Moreover it describes Guru Nanak dev ji as an incarnation of Vishnu. These are similar to cock and bull stories often spread by fanatical hindus.

We go by Gurbani and Gurbani describes these devi and devtas as entities who were not able to overcome Maya. hewnce it is sheer ignorance to call Guru sahib as avtar of vishnu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Net pay after taxes. If you don't agree, think about this: If you were a trader and started off in China with silk that cost 100 rupees and came to India, and you had to pay total 800 rupees taxes at every small kingdom along the way, and then sold your goods for 1000 rupees, you'd have 100 rupees left, right? If your daswandh is on the gross, that's 100 rupees, meaning you have nothing left. Obviously, you owe only 10% of 100, not 10% of 1000. No, it's 10% before bills and other expenses. These expenses are not your expenses to earn money. They are consumption. If you are a business owner, you take out all expenses, including rent, shop electricity, cost of goods sold, advertising, and government taxes. Whatever is left is your profit and you owe 10% of that.  If you are an employee, you are also entitled to deduct the cost of earning money. That would be government taxes. Everything else is consumption.    
    • No, bro, it's simply not true that no one talks about Simran. Where did you hear that? Swingdon? The entire Sikh world talks about doing Simran, whether it's Maskeen ji, Giani Pinderpal Singh, Giani Kulwant Singh Jawaddi, or Sants. So what are you talking about? Agreed. Agreed. Well, if every bani were exactly the same, then why would Guru ji even write anything after writing Japji Sahib? We should all enjoy all the banis. No, Gurbani tells you to do Simran, but it's not just "the manual". Gurbani itself also has cleansing powers. I'm not saying not to do Simran. Do it. But Gurbani is not merely "the manual". Reading and singing Gurbani is spiritually helpful: ਪ੍ਰਭ ਬਾਣੀ ਸਬਦੁ ਸੁਭਾਖਿਆ ॥  ਗਾਵਹੁ ਸੁਣਹੁ ਪੜਹੁ ਨਿਤ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰ ਪੂਰੈ ਤੂ ਰਾਖਿਆ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The Lord's Bani and the words are the best utterances. Ever sing hear and recite them, O brother and the Perfect Guru shall save thee. Pause. p611 Here Guru ji shows the importance of both Bani and Naam: ਆਇਓ ਸੁਨਨ ਪੜਨ ਕਉ ਬਾਣੀ ॥ ਨਾਮੁ ਵਿਸਾਰਿ ਲਗਹਿ ਅਨ ਲਾਲਚਿ ਬਿਰਥਾ ਜਨਮੁ ਪਰਾਣੀ ॥੧॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ The mortal has come to hear and utter Bani. Forgetting the Name thou attached thyself to other desires. Vain is thy life, O mortal. Pause. p1219 Are there any house manuals that say to read and sing the house manual?
    • All of these are suppositions, bro. Linguists know that, generally, all the social classes of a physical area speak the same language, though some classes may use more advanced vocabulary. I'm talking about the syntax. That is, unless the King is an invader, which Porus was not. When you say Punjabi wasn't very evolved, what do you mean? The syntax must have been roughly the same. As for vocabulary, do you really think Punjabis at the time did nothing more than grunt to express their thoughts? That they had no shades of meaning? Such as hot/cold, red/yellow/blue, angry/sweet/loving/sad, etc? Why must we always have an inferiority complex?
    • I still think about that incident now and then, just haven't heard any developments regarding what happened, just like so many other things that have happened in Panjab!
    • There was a young Singh from abroad who went to Anandpur Sahib Hola and got into a fight with some Punjabis who were playing loud non-religious music. He had bana and a weapon or two. There were more of them than him.  He ended up losing his life. Don't be like that. Not worth it to fight manmukhs. @californiasardar1 ਮੂਰਖੈ ਨਾਲਿ ਨ ਲੁਝੀਐ ॥੧੯॥ Argue not with a fool. p473
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use