Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Muslims ain't all bad. Most of the bad ones I've come across have been paki. I think we should make that distinction. Arab, Irani, Bengali, Afghani I think are alright for the most part.

Sufis are cool.

I don't think we should dwell on negativity though. This seems like a heartfelt gesture by Muslims. Just like how Sikhs guarded mosques during the London riots.

Link to post
Share on other sites
http://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Guru_ki_maseet guru hargobind ji built a mosque for muslims who lived at sri hargobindpur. after partition the mosque came into state of neglect. guru granth sahib and some nihang singhs moved in to guru ki maseet. the mosque was then handed over to some muslims after being fixed up. but would muslims do the same for us?
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.sikhiwiki.../Guru_ki_maseet guru hargobind ji built a mosque for muslims who lived at sri hargobindpur. after partition the mosque came into state of neglect. guru granth sahib and some nihang singhs moved in to guru ki maseet. the mosque was then handed over to some muslims after being fixed up. but would muslims do the same for us?

very good point.

Post partion 1947, 40% of Pakistan was non Muslim, today its 2% whats happend to these numbers of non Muslims.

Non Muslims in Pakistan cant get Govt Jobs or in civial service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

very good point.

Post partion 1947, 40% of Pakistan was non Muslim, today its 2% whats happend to these numbers of non Muslims.

Non Muslims in Pakistan cant get Govt Jobs or in civial service.

i have seen a big sikh singer, traffic cops in the police. its worse being a hindu in pakistan, the government of pakistan actually invests at nankana sahib, unlike the indian government. but a large number of those people fled to india or were killed after partition.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think this part of a larger Indic problem. Treachery has always been part of our DNA, however in our history and our Pre-Sikh heritage we have never dealt with treachery. There has never been any repercussions against traitors.   
    • They're only a few miles from a masjid.  It would be better to help them organize themselves into a seperate space.  Only in the harshest of crazy circumstances would this be appropriate.  I don't think the line about Allah they read is out of line, so much as it's clearly against Rehit.  We don't let anyone do anything except Aikido, in line with our policies in the Dojo. Only the rare visiting revered cultural artist and the taiko drummers have been welcome. No other Budo even, let alone another heritage of system entirely.  We have had a few meditation types presented, studied with mentalists and psychologists though. 
    • Thank you. I've been trying to remember the name of that movie for a week or two.  Good timing. 
    • Saw this on lawyer, Harjap Bhangal’s show yesterday. it can apply even to adults born and lived all life in UK  https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/patels-citizenship-stripping-bill-would-accelerate-uk-race-to-the-bottom/   Amal De Chickera 26 November 2021, 3.19pm   Patel’s citizenship-stripping bill would accelerate UK race to the bottom Britain already breaks international norms. The Home Office bid to remove citizenship without notice is a landmark on the path to authoritarianism…. Section 40 of the British Nationality Actsets out citizenship deprivation powers in a manner which, in essence, creates three tiers of British citizenship. The most secure, top tier, which cannot be taken away in any circumstances, is afforded to British-born citizens who have no other nationality. Less secure is the citizenship of those born British, or naturalised, who also have another nationality. Section 40 states that such people can be deprived of their citizenship without leaving them stateless, if the home secretary is satisfied that such a measure is “conducive to the public  On the least secure, bottom tier are those naturalised as British citizens who have no other nationality. They can be stripped of their citizenship even if this results in their statelessness, if the home secretary believes on reasonable grounds that the person is able to become a citizen of another state….   Patel’s power grab It is in this context that Patel introduced a new clause to the already controversial Nationality and Borders Bill, which is presently at report stage in the House of Commons. If enacted, section 9 of the bill would empower the home secretary to deprive a British citizen of nationality without notice if she does not have the information needed to serve notice, deems it not reasonably practicable to do so, or believes it is in the interests of national security, relations with another state or otherwise in the public interest. This proposed amendment thus further relaxes the procedural obligations of the Home Office, which is required under current law to give written notice before depriving a British national of their citizenship (a 2018 amendmentallows the Home Office to serve notice to the person’s last known address if their whereabouts are unknown).  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use