Jump to content

Ardas and sewa for Con mass shooting victims.


Singh559
 Share

Recommended Posts

This was all vahegurus doing.Its really sad that waheguru made this happen.

So if I were to slap you; would you say I slapped you or Waheguru or did Waheguru or me slap you? Waheguru resides in all beings.

If you were able to dodge my slap would it have been Waheguru who dodged it or you?

What is Waheguru's will?

I'm sincerely asking because I thought your comment rivals those like the crazy christians that said japan deserved the tsunami and whatnot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There needs to be correction made to what I said earlier. The killer is 20 yr old Adam Lanza, his 24 yr old brother Ryan Lanza is alive and in custody for questioning but is not considered a suspect, their father is also alive and being questioned as well, the mom was a teacher in the same school and was found murdered at her home in the same town. Adam reportedly was suffering from mental sickness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if I were to slap you; would you say I slapped you or Waheguru or did Waheguru or me slap you? Waheguru resides in all beings.

If you were able to dodge my slap would it have been Waheguru who dodged it or you?

What is Waheguru's will?

I'm sincerely asking because I thought your comment rivals those like the crazy christians that said japan deserved the tsunami and whatnot.

Everything that happens no matter what it's all upto waheguru.We have a mind of our own or does waheguru control it?Does waheguru think or do we think?

Do you think I'm saying that those kids deserved that?They did nothing to deserve that.They did nothing in Japan to deserve that.

Even when I'm saying as of right now it's all wahegurus doing.

I hate to break it to ya but waheguru is GOOD but he also is bad.If there was a separate god who controls the bad then what is waheguru?Waheguru is accountable for everything.We do not have a mind of our own but it's wahegurus mind.

Waheguru is good and he is evil.He is everything.Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi.

I know I sound crazy but thats how waheguru made me.

I hope you understand.Please enlighten me because this topic has been on my mind for a couple of weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything that happens no matter what it's all upto waheguru.We have a mind of our own or does waheguru control it?Does waheguru think or do we think?

Do you think I'm saying that those kids deserved that?They did nothing to deserve that.They did nothing in Japan to deserve that.

Even when I'm saying as of right now it's all wahegurus doing.

I hate to break it to ya but waheguru is GOOD but he also is bad.If there was a separate god who controls the bad then what is waheguru?Waheguru is accountable for everything.We do not have a mind of our own but it's wahegurus mind.

Waheguru is good and he is evil.He is everything.Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi Tuhi.

I know I sound crazy but thats how waheguru made me.

I hope you understand.Please enlighten me because this topic has been on my mind for a couple of weeks.

I wanted a simple answer. If i slapped you, was it Waheguru or was it me? If Waheguru is Akaal and Satnaam, then an action out of ego isn't an action of Waheguru, or is it?

Why does Sikhi say you're born with a blank slate and whatever you do in this dream is our own actions to merge back into Waheguru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the work of evill and twisted people. Waheguru does not dictate these tragedies, of course he is the doer because it is his doing that gives us the ability to commit these horrendous acts. BUT that does NOT mean we hold him responsible.

I don't understand why people get confused with this and can't get their heads around it.

Only five and myself discussed this and explained it in another thread.

Anyway, I know we don't believe in such concepts of 'Hell'' as in christianity, but at times like this I certainly wish and hope that such a 'Hell'' does exist and the killer rots and suffers in there for eternity !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted a simple answer. If i slapped you, was it Waheguru or was it me? If Waheguru is Akaal and Satnaam, then an action out of ego isn't an action of Waheguru, or is it?

Why does Sikhi say you're born with a blank slate and whatever you do in this dream is our own actions to merge back into Waheguru.

Waheguru slapped me because waheguru is us.Waheguru is the ego.He is everything.He is the sin,he the good,bad,everything etc.

So waheguru has nothing to do with our lives that we have to do everything our selves?We start with a blank slate and we have to go through and do everything by our selves?Waheguru does not even one little thing?

ਆਪਿ ਭੁਲਾਏ ਭੁਲੀਐ ਆਪੇ ਮੇਲਿ ਮਿਲਾਇ ॥ आपि भुलाए भुलीऐ आपे मेलि मिलाइ ॥ Āp bẖulā▫e bẖulī▫ai āpe mel milā▫e. The Lord Himself misleads the misguided ones, and He Himself unites them in His Union.

ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰਮੁਖਿ ਛੁਟੀਐ ਜੇ ਚਲੈ ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਭਾਇ ॥੬॥ नानक गुरमुखि छुटीऐ जे चलै सतिगुर भाइ ॥६॥ Nānak gurmukẖ cẖẖutī▫ai je cẖalai saṯgur bẖā▫e. ||6|| O Nanak, the Gurmukhs are saved; they walk in harmony with the Will of the True Guru. ||6||

ਸਤਿਗੁਰ ਕੈ ਭਾਣੈ ਜੋ ਚਲੈ ਤਿਪਤਾਸੈ ਹਰਿ ਗੁਣ ਗਾਇ ॥ सतिगुर कै भाणै जो चलै तिपतासै हरि गुण गाइ ॥ Saṯgur kai bẖāṇai jo cẖalai ṯipṯāsai har guṇ gā▫e. Whoever walks in harmony with the Will of the True Guru, and sings the Glorious Praises of the Lord, is pleasing to Him.

ਨਾਨਕ ਕਰਤਾ ਸਭ ਕਿਛੁ ਜਾਣਦਾ ਜਿਨਿ ਰਖੀ ਬਣਤ ਬਣਾਇ ॥੩੬॥ नानक करता सभ किछु जाणदा जिनि रखी बणत बणाइ ॥३६॥ Nānak karṯā sabẖ kicẖẖ jāṇḏā jin rakẖī baṇaṯ baṇā▫e. ||36|| O Nanak, the Creator who made this making knows everything. ||36||

ਨਾਨਕ ਕਰਤਾ ਕਰੇ ਸੁ ਹੋਇ ॥੪੩॥ नानक करता करे सु होइ ॥४३॥ Nānak karṯā kare so ho▫e. ||43|| O Nanak, whatever the Creator Lord does, comes to pass. ||43||

ਭੁਲਿਆਂ ਆਪਿ ਸਮਝਾਇਸੀ ਜਾ ਕਉ ਨਦਰਿ ਕਰੇ ॥ भुलिआं आपि समझाइसी जा कउ नदरि करे ॥ Bẖuli▫āʼn āp samjẖā▫isī jā ka▫o naḏar kare. The Lord Himself instructs those who are misguided, when He casts His Glance of Grace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another shooting. Go figure. The guns apparently belonged to his mother. What was an elementary school teacher doing with semi-automatic rifle at her home anyway? Was she preparing for a zombie apocalypse?

Because it was her right to own them. Maybe she liked going to gun ranges. Maybe she bought them for home defense. I don't think why she owned them is important.

What is important is the lack of mental healthcare available in this country. Nearly all these shootings are done by individuals suffering from serious mental issues. There needs to be a reform in the system, which is why Obama's healthcare law should greatly improve things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is important is the lack of mental healthcare available in this country. Nearly all these shootings are done by individuals suffering from serious mental issues. There needs to be a reform in the system, which is why Obama's healthcare law should greatly improve things

I agree with this. It is the lack of mental healthcare available in this country.

Also the mother was NOT a teacher at the same school according to CNN.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/14/us/connecticut-school-shooting/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was searching igurbani.com which gives correct pronunciation of Gurbani. I can’t remember all of it at once. I guess it relies on more practice, like more Sehaj Paths. The meaning becomes clearer. I have noticed slight variants in it. This could be because it’s written in old Punjabi.  
    • Veer Manpreet Singh, a lay preacher, claims that -Sikhs aren't supposed to worship Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We are only supposed to worship God as is written in Guru Granth Sahib ji. -We only "revere" Guru Granth Sahib ji.     He says a lot of other things in this video, some are good refutations of Hindu superstitions, but the reformers often go too far. Anyways, what he is saying about not worshipping Guru Granth Sahib ji is totally wrong. The reason is Guru Granth Sahib ji is Guru. Guru is Satguru. Satguru is God. We worship God. Therefore, we also worship Satguru (Guru Granth Sahib ji).   There are innumerable verses in Gurbani equating God and Guru. ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਗੁਰੁ ਡੁਬਦਾ ਲਏ ਤਰਾਇ ॥੨॥ The Guru is the Supreme Lord and the Transcendent Master. The Guru floats (saves) the drowning one. p49   ਗੁਰੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਏਕੋ ਜਾਣੁ ॥ Know the Guru and God as One. p864   ਗੁਰ ਨਾਲਿ ਤੁਲਿ ਨ ਲਗਈ ਖੋਜਿ ਡਿਠਾ ਬ੍ਰਹਮੰਡੁ ॥ There is no one at par with the Guru. I have searched and seen the whole universe. p49 (If the Guru is the greatest in the whole universe, shouldn't we worship the Guru?)   I'd like to ask Manpreet Singh what is worship? Any reasonable definition would include obeisance, remembrance, and praise. Those are exactly the same things Gurbani says to do regarding Guru! Remembrance and obeisance: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੁ ਅਪਨਾ ਸਦ ਸਦਾ ਸਮ੍ਹਾਰੇ ॥ Ever, ever, I think of the True Guru, ਗੁਰ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਕੇਸ ਸੰਗਿ ਝਾਰੇ ॥੧॥ and the Guru's feet I brush with my head's hair. p387   Praise: ਗੁਰੁ ਪਾਰਬ੍ਰਹਮੁ ਪਰਮੇਸਰੁ ਆਪਿ ॥ The Guru himself is the transcendent Lord and the supreme master. ਆਠ ਪਹਰ ਨਾਨਕ ਗੁਰ ਜਾਪਿ ॥੪॥੧੬॥੬੭॥ Throughout the eight watches of the day, O Nanak meditate thou on the Guru. p387   In fact, Gurbani says the way to find God is to worship (puja) of Guru: ਸਤਿਗੁਰੂ ਕੇ ਚਰਨ ਧੋਇ ਧੋਇ ਪੂਜਹੁ ਇਨ ਬਿਧਿ ਮੇਰਾ ਹਰਿ ਪ੍ਰਭੁ ਲਹੁ ਰੇ ॥ ਰਹਾਉ ॥ Washing and bathing the True Guru's feet, worship thou them. In this way thou shall obtain my Lord Master. Pause. p1118   Could it be any clearer that we are to worship Guru ji?
    • Bro, reciting a shorter Chaupai Sahib is hardly "anti-Dasam". It's fine to argue that the longer Chaupai is more traditional, but the short one isn't anti-Dasam. That's like claiming shorter Rehras is anti-Guru Granth Sahib ji just because there are fewer selections from Guru Granth Sahib. It might not be traditional, but it's not anti-Guru Granth Sahib. I prefer the longer versions, but let's not exaggerate. Every tradition has a slightly different Rehras version. Nanaksar vs Taksal vs Nihangs and so on. The basic template for Rehras is at the beginning of Guru Granth Sahib ji. Later, Chaupai Sahib was added and Anand Sahib always follows as the end of a process. Then some sangats added more saloks to start Rehras and others were added at the end. Some additional selections from Dasam Bani were also added, but it wasn't the same ones for every sangat. The important thing is to not hate on each other for these variations.
    • Umm, so you're upset that this jatha did Chaupai the same way it's being done at Harimandar Sahib for 100 years? Shouldn't you be upset at the manager of Darbar Sahib? I'm not saying that Sikhs who are aware of certain issues shouldn't do the longer Chaupai, but there are only so many battles you can fight. Instead of calling some jatha traitors because they're doing the (for better or worse) "standard" Chauapai published by the SGPC, it would be better to change things from the central point. You can't fault the average Sikh for picking up the average Gutka and doing paath.
    • It's the same here in Toronto. Alot of the gudwaras here are political orientated and get tons of funding from the government-probably want them stay hush hush with all the BS that has been happening with India.  These guys are skewing gurbani. A complaint was sent to a ragi singh a couple of days ago in regards to a hukamnama. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use