Jump to content

The Fascist Offensive In Punjab - Anti Sikh Shiv Sena


Nalwa
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://ihro.in/images/FASCIST.pdf

The Fascist Offensive in Punjab
A MISCHIEF AT NAKODAR
FEBRUARY 2, 1986
INTRODUCTION
The news of burning of sacred "Birs" of Guru Granth
Sahib in Guru Arjun Dev Gurdwara in Guru
Nanak Pura Mohalla, of Nakodar in Jalandhar Distri
ct spread like wild fire on February 2, 1986.
There was a spontaneous strike to protest against th
e desecration of the holy Granth in the town that
day. On February 3, 1986, lawyers stayed away
Courts and students abstained from educational
institutions. On a call by the Akali Dals' a prot
est march was organised jointly by the Sikh and
Hindu communities. Citizens, including women and child
ren participated in the procession. A strike

was observed in the town

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shiv Sena plans march
The Punjab Hindu Shiv Sena wanted to take out a procession but the authorities thought it prudent
to clamp curfew at 7:00 PM on February 3. Baba
Joginder Singh and the Shiv Sena leader, Rama-
kant Jalota, arrived at Nakodar the same day but the Baba left the town at 5:30 PM The same night
the police arrested 12 Sena activists who were
violating curfew restrictions and moving around
with unsheathed swords.
Earlier, on February 3, some Sikh youths staged
a dharna (protest) outside the Police station and
the Bus Stand demanding the arrest of local Shiv
Sena leader Mr. Romesh Chopra alias Khan, a
vegetable commission agent, who, they alleged, w
as responsible for the fire. At about 4.00 PM a
large number of villagers joined the youths and
sieged the police station and demanded the arrest
of the alleged arsonists.
The District Magistrate, Mr. S. C. Aggarwal and
the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Mr.
Izhar Alam rushed to the town
with Police re-enforcement. There
was tension in the town. It ulti-
mately led to firing by the Police on February 4,
1986, killing at least four persons and injuring
many more, for which the Punjab Government announced a judicial inquiry. The All India Sikh
Students Federation (AISSF) rejected the inquiry a
nd called it as "a mere eyewash." The Federation
demanded registration of criminal cases against
the Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG)
and police officers responsible for killing the people. They denied the official version of "four
deaths" and added that many mo
re persons had died and over tw
o dozen injured. The Federation
observed "Black Day" on February 8, 1986, and
asked the Chief Minister to resign on the ground
of his failure to control the police force which had killed "innocent Sikh youths."
Officers shifted, transferred
In the meantime, the Punjab Government
announced the suspension of Mr. Surjit Singh,
Superintendent of Police (Detective), and Mr
. Gopal Singh Ghuman, Deputy Superintendent of
Police (DSP) Nakodar. Mr. Harinderpal Singh, Inspector Police and Mr. Izhar Alam were
transferred. Mr. Balwant Singh, Finance Minister
of Punjab observed that the police had behaved
"as during Congress (1) rule."
Mr. Balwant Singh promised that the culprits responsible for burning the "Birs" of the holy
Granth would be brought to book, no matter to which
community or religion they belonged. Earlier,
Jathedar Harcharan Singh Mahalon, Mr. Kuldip
Singh Wadala and Mr. Surjit Singh Minhas sat in
dharna in front of the Police Station demanding the arrest of the culprits and a judicial inquiry into
the police firing. The situation in Shahkot became
tense when some Shiv Sena workers, too,
gathered near the Police Station. The
police, however, managed to disperse them.
On February 6, the Punjab Government transferred
the DIG, Mr. G. S. Bhullar, as a sequel to the
incidents at Nakodar. Curfew continued in the to
wn but all the persons who had been arrested for
violation of the curfew were released. The Deputy
Commissioner, S. S. Aggarwal, declared that
cases against 20 Sikh youths under Section 307 IP
C (Indian Penal Code) were being withdrawn.

However, Mr. R. K. Jalota and Mr. S. K. Sarwal
of Shiv Sena welcomed the judicial inquiry and
condemned the transfer of Mr. Alam and three other Police officers and demanded suspension of
the Sub divisional Magistrate (SDM), Nakodar, Mr. Surjit Singh Rajput. They held him
responsible for the disturbances in the town.
The Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) constituted a two-member committee
comprising Mr. Kabal Singh, senior Vice Presi
dent, and Mr. Kuldip Singh Wadala, an Akali MLA
from Nakodar, to inquire into the incident. They
concluded that the Police officers were
responsible for mishandling the situation and they
should be punished. They said, “It was an act of
"Anti-Panthic" forces that wanted to create a gulf between Hindus and the Sikhs”.
Dr. Baldev Parkash, President Punjab Bhartiya Janat
a Party (BJP) said in a statement, that the
burning of "Birs" of Guru Granth Sahib was a
sacrilegious act and the culprits should be punished.
Whosoever did it, have committed a grave offence
to disrupt the peace and communal harmony.
He further warned the people to beware of
the forces that wanted to jeopardise the communal
amity in the State.
Two views on fire
Many people thought that the fire incident was accident
al. However, many others were of the view
that it was the handiwork of mischievous elem
ents. The International Human Rights Organisation
constituted a 5-member Sub-Committee headed by Mr. Dev Raj Sharma, Advocate, to enquire into
the circumstances leading to the incident as
well as its aftermath. Other members were Mr.
Gurbhajan Singh Gill, (Retd DSP), Mr. H. L. Seth
i, Advocate, Mr. D. S. Gill, Advocate, and Mr.
Bhalinder Singh, Advocate.
The Committee visited Nakodar and went to the Gurdwa
ra where the five sacred "Birs" were
burnt. It also visited other places including Kapur
thala Road area where the
Police had resorted to
the firing; the Saw Mill of Natha Singh wherein one
person was alleged to have been killed; the
residence of Mr. Pritu, a Balmiki from two dead
bodies of Sikhs were discovered and the Sherpur
Bridge and village including a few farm houses; where
the police allegedly beat up and arrested the
villagers from their homes. The team also met th
e SDM, the Electricity Board Staff, advocates and
many other local citizens.
I. B. man visits Nakodar
The Committee examined Mr. Sukhdev Singh
Sandhu. Mr. Ravinder Singh, Mr. Sudarshan
Singh Bains, Mr. Varinderpal Singh and Mr. C J Jain, Advocates; Mr. Romesh Chopra alias Khan,
Mr. Mohan Singh Sectional Officer (SO) of the Punjab Works Department (PWD), Mr. Swaran
Singh, Mr. Tejinder Singh, Mr. Jatinder Singh,
Mr. Gurinder Singh, Mr. Pritu Balmiki, Mr.
Bachittar Singh, Mr. Mohinder Singh, Mr. Sohan
Singh, Bhai Sukhchain Singh Granthi, Mr.
Simratpal Singh, Mrs. Gurdip Kaur wife of the Granthi, Mr. Prem Sagar, Municipal
Commissioner, Piara Singh, Ex-President Gurdwa
ra and Mr. Vijay Nayar of the Shiv Sena.
Observations of several other persons who did not wa
nt to disclose their identity were also recorded.
A witness claimed that on February 2, he saw Mr. Umrao Singh, a Congress (1) leader along with
Mr. Ranjit Singh Bhinder, a DSP of Intelligence Bureau (IB), getting down from a jeep. They
entered the house of Pundit Narinder Nath Bhutar
a alias "Nindo." Pundit Nindo is said to be a
patron of the Shiv Sena and a close confidant of
Mr. Darbara Singh, the former Chief Minister of
Punjab. Mr. Nindo had also acted as Election in-charge of Mr. Darbara Singh in the past. After Mr.
Umrao Singh and the IB person left the town the
Shiv Sena workers from outside started reaching
the town.
According to Mr. Mohan Singh, (SO, PWD), when the news of the influx of Sena workers
reached the villages, about 40-50 persons reached
the outskirts of Nakodar where the DSP of
Nakodar, Mr. Gopal Singh Ghuman advised them to
go back. He told them that they could not
be allowed to go inside the town due to curfe
w restrictions and assured them that the Gurdwaras

were safe. Upon which they returned to their homes.
Mr. Ramesh Chopra alias Khan admitted that he
was regarded as a prime suspect from the very
first day as he had been informed by Mr. Prem
Sagar, the Municipal Commissioner (MC) the same
evening. He added that the Sikhs had given an u
ltimatum to the police to arrest him by 6.00 PM on
February 3. He had therefore, collected Shiv
Sena activists in Moha
lla Tandona and took out a
procession at 6.30 PM in a show of his strength wh
ile raising inflammatory slogans, "Jai Shiv
Shakti, Jai Trishul." The administration imposed curfew restrictions immediately.
Mr. Romesh Chopra denied that Mr. R. K. Jalota had stayed with Pundit N. N. Bhutara, he did not
allow Bhutara's entry into the Mandir Devi Tala
b, the headquarters of the Shiv Sena and that no
activists from outside, except Jalota and Sarwal,
had entered the town. He further denied his
hand in the fire incident and said that he held
the Holy Granth in reverence. He alleged that Mr.
Jaswant Singh, Jathedar Iqbal Singh, and Mr. Ra
vinder Singh, Advocate, instigated the villagers
against him.
On the other hand, Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate, a
lleged that the Sikhs suspected Mr. Chopra to
be a culprit and the authorities had connived with the culprits.
Accusing finger at Darbara-Balwant
A few senior Hindu Advocates of the Nakodar Bar Association revealed that on the night of
February 7, 1986, a similar incident took place in
the Shankar village Gurdwara where the culprit
had been allegedly captured re
d-handed and handed over to the
Police. He was said to be a Hindu
from UP in the garb of Sikh and was let off.
Mr. Umrao Singh and Mr. Swaran Singh belong to
this village. Similar incidents took place in th
e Mandirs of Sarinh village and Nakodar.
According to them, this type of activity could
be the handiwork of none else than those who were
active on the eve of operation "Blue Star."
But some Sikh advocates of the Nakodar Bar, on the other hand, blamed Mr. Balwant Singh for all
the trouble at Nakodar.
THE GURDWARA INCIDENT
Gurdwara, Guru Arjan Dev Ji, is centrally located
in Guru Nanakpura Mohalla of Nakodar where
the five "Birs" of Guru Granth Sahib were
burnt due to fire in the forenoon of February 2.
Granthi, Bhai Sukhchain Singh, who lives on the Gurdwara premises along with his family, looks
after the Gurdwara.
The Gurdwara has two gates, one facing the Gurdwara
Hall and the other towards the left side of
the Hall. The residence of the Granthi is on the ri
ght side of the main gate while its kitchen is on
the left side of the gate. The "Sukhasan" room is on
the right side of the half opening in the veranda
that connects the room with the side gate th
rough a passage behind the Hall. The "Sukhasan" room
is not visible from inside the kitchen, the wall being windowless. If any person comes through the
side gate, uses the rear passage and enters the
"Sukhasan" room, causes mischief and returns, he
cannot be seen either from the residence or from the kitchen.
No dhoop or jyoti
The Granthi opens (Parkash) one "bir" of the Ho
ly Granth on the "Diwan" inside the "Sukhasan"
room at 5:30 PM daily, while four "birs" in closed position (Sukhasan) are kept on the Niwar bed in
the room. This "parkash" is done for devotees who wa
nt the recitation individually. Thereafter, the
Granthi opens two "birs" in the main hall for
the routine recitation. No, "Dhoop" or "Jyoti" is
inside that "Sukhasan" room.
On the day of occurrence, February 2, 1986, Bh
ai Sukhchain Singh conducted his routine duties
and left the Gurdwara to perform "Anand Ka
raj" (Marriage ceremony) at the residence of one

Sadhu Singh on the Noormahal Road. According to th
e Granthi, he placed the Gurdwara keys
inside the "Sukhasan" room at 8.45 PM as usual and left the place.
Mrs. Gurmit Kaur, a widow and a devotee of Guru Nanakpura Mohalla who lives close to the
Gurdwara, was seen cleaning the "Sukhasan" Room at 9.15 PM by many devotees of the locality. It
was her routine work.
At about 9.45 PM, Mrs. Gurdip Kaur, spouse of
the Granthi, while going towards the kitchen
heard cracking of glass panes and saw flames leaping out of the window of the "Sukhasan" Room.
She ran outside and raised the alarm. Local resi
dents rushed to the spot and threw water to
extinguish the fire.
The administration and the police were informed. The SDM Mr. Surjit Singh Rajput, and the DSP,
Mr. Gopal Singh Ghuman, reached and inspected th
e spot. By the time the Granthi, too, came back.
The "Bir" that lay on the Diwan and open on page
792, was largely burnt. The Niwar bed became a
skeleton whereas the Diwan was half burnt. The "Romalas" were also burnt. The room, windows
and the door were damaged due to mounting flam
es of the fire. The mat flooring and cloth sheets
were also burnt.
The persons and the officers present there, ruled out
the possibility of any accident or negligence.
Case FIR (First Information Report) No 50 date
d 2.2.1986 under Section 295/439 IPC was registered
at 10.35 PM in Police Station Nakodar at the instance of Mrs. Gurdip Kaur.
Accident or negligence?
It was decided by the persons present at the Gurdwara including members of the management
Committee that the burnt "Birs" would be taken to Sri Goindwal Sahib for the last rites. But some
Akali leaders including Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocat
e and Jathedar Iqbal Singh advised against
such a move. This decision contributed to the
deterioration of the already tense situation.
At about 5.00 PM, the SSP Mohd Izhar Alam accompanied by the Additional Deputy
Commissioner (ADC), Mr. Darbara Singh "Guru," inspected the spot and without any further
enquiries concluded that the episode was accident
al and the fire was caused due to negligence on
the part of the Granthi. Most of the local citi
zens did not agree with this police version and
demanded identification of and stern action against the guilty as it was a case of desecration of the
Holy Granth Sahib. But the SSP remained adaman
t on his stand. It resulted in flaring up of the
already tense situation. By the nightfall, the news
of burning the Holy Granth and the inaction of the
police reached the surrounding villages.
The Sub-Committee of the IHRO, inspected the Gurd
wara premises and examined several residents
of the Mohalla including Hindus.
The committee after careful inspection of the "Sukhasan" room and eliciting the view of experts has
reached the conclusion that the fire could not be
the result of an accident as there was no short
circuit, the electric wire and fuse were intact.
The committee also does not subscribe to the
negligence theory because there was no "Dhoop" or
"Jyoti" lit nor there was any candle. There was
no failure in the supply of electricity that day. This
conclusion is also warranted by the assertions of
Mr. R. K. Gupta, in charge Sub-Division, 132 K. V. Station and Mr. Amolak Singh, Sub Divisional
Officer (SDO) of the Punjab State Electricity Board (PSEB), on the subject. According to them
there was neither any cut in the supply of electri
city nor was there any complaint regarding power
failure from Guru Nanakpura Mohalla on February 2, 1986.
C O N C L U S I O N
Having ruled out the accident and negligence theories as explained above, the committee is
inclined to believe that the fire was man-lit po
ssibly with the aim of creating mischief. It is

inescapable for the committee to conclude that
a communal clash, was the object behind the
mischief. This conclusion is supported by th
e circumstances. The residents reported to the
committee that similar incidents took place at Shankar and Sarinh villages as well as in Nakodar
itself where mischief was attempted at two Gurd
waras and one Mandir before the Nakodar inci-
dent.
The committee is very much concerned and is eager
to know the real reason for the presence of an
Intelligence Officer, Mr. Ranjit Singh Bhinder along with Mr. Umrao Singh, a Congress (1)
leader, at the home of a patron of the Shiv Sena, soon after the incident.
The committee was intrigued to hear from Mr. Ravinder Singh, a
close friend of Mr. Balwant Singh, Finance Minister, Punjab, that Mr. Romesh Chopra of Shiv Sena
could be the culprit. It is interesting that Mr.
Ravinder Singh was instrumental in reversing the local
Gurdwara Committee's move to take the burnt "B
irs" to Goindwal Sahib for the last rites.
A few lawyers of Nakodar claimed that Mr. Umra
o Singh and Mr. Balwant Singh were very
close to each other although they belonged to
two different political camps. Mr. Umrao Singh
contested from Nakodar Constituency and was defeat
ed by Mr. Kuldip
Singh Wadala. Mr. Wadala
and Mr. Balwant Singh are known to belong to two
factions within the Akali Party. Due to a
combination of political and other interests,
Mr. Umrao Singh, Mr. Darbara Singh and Mr.
Balwant Singh are stated to be close to each other.
A few senior Hindu Advocates, who do not want to be
identified, are of the view that Mr. Darbara
Singh's role in igniting the communal fire c
ould not be beyond the realm of suspicion due to
expertise available to persons like him, and because
they were responsible for the very elements
who had thrown cow tails in mandirs (temples)
and packets of cigarettes in Gurdwara Sarovars
(Sacred Pool) on the eve of the operation "blue star."
THE FIRING INCIDENT
On February 3, 1986, a protest march, in response
to a call given by Akali Dal, started at 10.00 PM
from Gurdwara Guru Arjan Dev Ji in Guru Na
nakpura Mohalla. Sikh students of all the three
local colleges also joined the march. It was orga
nised after the police failed to apprehend the
culprits. Both the communities participated, in
cluding the local advocates who in addition
observed a strike that day. Akali workers a da
y earlier had given a call through the public address
system for the march.
Mr. Kuldip Singh Wadala along with some local leaders led the march. Five Singhs carried
unsheathed Kirpans in their hands as a show of tradition.
Mr. Kuldip Singh Wadala left the march when
it reached Sabzimandi. The procession reached
Ambedkar Chowk shouting slogans.
The murderers of Guru Granth Sahib should be a
rrested, the desecration of the Guru Granth Sahib
shall not be tolerated.
A clash averted
According to Mr. Gurdarshan Singh Bains, Advo
cate, who was at Ambedkar Chowk just near his
residence, when the protest march of about 1,000 pe
rsons reached the Chowk, a small rally was held
in which some Sikh youths including students demande
d the arrest of "Khan" in connection with
the Gurdwara fire incidents. About 700/800 Sh
iv Sena workers who had gathered in Tandona
Mohalla adjoining the Chowk, rushed
towards the Chowk raising slogans.
The counter-slogan by the Sikh youth was: "Kha
listan Zindabad." The local citizens started
dispersing from the Chowk while the processionist
s mostly students and villages proceeded towards

the police station and the Shiv Sena workers towa
rds Mandir Devi Talab. Mr. Bains testified that
Shiv Sena workers were armed w
ith unsheathed swords and lathis.
When the procession reached the
Bus Stand, according to Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate, there
were about 200 Sikh youths who held a rally there.
They were demanding the arrest of Mr. Romesh
Chopra again. From there they sat on "Dharna" in front of the Police Station and gave an
ultimatum to the police that in case Mr. Romesh Chopra was not called for interrogation by 6.00
PM they would decide the next course of action
next morning at Gurdwara Guru Arjan Dev Ji.
In the meantime, Mr. Ravinder Singh said- Mr. Kuld
ip Singh Wadala, Mr. Ajit Singh Khattar, Mr.
Charan Singh and Mr. Jaswant Singh, Circle Jathedars requested the SSP and ADC present in the
Police Station to round up Mr. Romesh Chopra so that the inflamed tempers of the Sikhs were
pacified. But the SSP remained adamant and
asserted that he had summoned more police forces
from Kapurthala, Hoshiarpur and other districts to deal with the situation firmly.
SSP's adamant attitude
Baba Joginder Singh, too talked to the SSP and ADC
at Gurdwara Guru Arjan Dev Ji at 5.00 PM
but to no avail. Babaji, later pacified the Sikhs
and requested the Hindus present there to help the
identification of the culprits so that the whole
community was not blamed for the act of one
individual. He later left Nakodar.
At 6:00 PM, two Motor Cyclists, in plain clothes,
visited Mohalla Tandona, according to Mr. Bains.
They watched the activities of the Sena activ
ists and brought police along with CRPF who dis-
persed the Sena workers, soon afterwards the curfew was clamped.
Mr. Bains testified: "Mr. Ramakant Jalota and Mr
. R K Sarwal, Shiv Sena leaders along with a
large number of their members and workers fro
m outside the Mohalla Tandona area reached there
before the curfew was imposed. On February 4,
1986, Villagers collected in the Malri Sahib
Gurdwara. About 40/50 persons including Mr.
Sukhdev Singh Sandhu, Advocate, reached Malri
Bridge at about 10.00 PM. By the time Baba
Joginder Singh and Subedar
Harcharan Singh Rode
arrived at the bridge, where the police did not a
llow them to go to the to
wn as there were curfew
restrictions. Babaji then appealed to
the people gathered there to disperse.
At about 10.30 PM about 100 persons
led by Nihang Pargat Singh of Rauli village entered the town
from Mehatpur side escorted by a Sikh Inspector
of the Punjab Police and the CRPF. This Jatha
reached near Ambedkar Chowk without any hindrance inspite of the curfew restrictions.
About 100 workers of Shiv Sena led by Mr. R. K.
Jalota, Mr. Sarwal and Mr. Romesh Chopra alias
Khan, according to Mr. Sudarshan Singh Bains, Advocate, who lives near the Chowk, came out of
Mohalla Tandona. Both the parties raised slogans
. The CRPF intervened near the shop of Pundit
Narinder Nath Bhutara and the Sikh Jatha (group) was then escorted out of this town.
A Nihang's emergence
This Jatha reached Sherpur Bridge where villagers
had already collected. By 2.30 PM more than
500 persons had gathered there. No one w
as leading the assembly. Mr. Sukhdev Singh Sandhu,
Advocate, was also present there. He testified that Mr. Jaswinder Singh, President, Akali Dal,
Youth Wing, Mr. Paramjit Singh Malhi, Secretary, District AISSF Giani Roshan Singh of United
Akali Dal (UAD) and Mr. Harminder Singh Sa
ndhu, Convenor, AISSF Lyalpur Khalsa College,
Jalandhar, addressed the assembly. Mr. Sandhu de
nied that any provocative speech was made. All
witnesses blamed the Administration for not taking t
actful steps to defuse the tense situation and
condemned the officers who refused to talk to the Sikhs.
Mr. Sandhu deposed that he along with Mr. Bach
ittar Singh, Mr. Mohinder Singh and two others
were authorised by the persons present, to requ
est the authorities to assure the Sikhs that "Khan"
would be apprehended, and to a
llow five persons, to see (have "Darshan" of) the burnt holy "Birs"

at the Gurdwara so that, on return, they could
take the people in confidence about the damage done
to the Gurdwara. But the officers did not budge.
Then Nihang Pargat Singh told the gathering at 3.
30 PM that they had been through the bazaars,
no body would object to their peacefully proceedi
ng to the Gurdwara for "Darshan," according to
Mr. Sandhu.
Processionists allowed
On this assurance, the Police
present at the Bridge gave way to the people who peacefully
proceeded towards the town a
nd reached near Natha Singh Saw Mills where police and Para-
military forces were deployed in strength. The force was led by Mr. Ashwini Kumar Sharma, SP
(Detective) and Mr. Jaskirat Singh, Inspector, Station House Officer (SHO), etc.
Mr. Sandhu stated that at this spot, the forces after
throwing 2/3 tear gas shells started indiscriminate
firing without any warning. The processsionists were unarmed. One Ravinder Singh of Litran, a
close relative of Jathedar Harcharan Singh Mahal
on, was killed on the spot. Mr. Harminder Singh
Sandhu rushed towards the Saw Mill to escape fro
m Police fire, where Inspector Jaskirat Singh
challenged him. Sandhu was about six feet inside
the Saw Mill. He stopped. Mr. Jaskirat Singh
fired at point-blank range with his service re
volver hitting the victim's face. He fell down. Mr.
Amarjit Singh Dhillon of AISSF Jalandhar rushed to his colleague's rescue and to offer him a glass
of water. Mr. Jaskirat Singh prevented Mr
. Dhillon from going near the injured young person.
Both the young persons were arrested.
Fire is opened
The people ran helter-skelter. Jasbir Singh Jassi, gunman
of DSP Nakodar, opened a burst with his
sten-gun. Just after, two dead bodies were lifted by the people from near the house of Priti
Balmiki where one bullock was killed
and the other disabled with bullets.
The police, para-military forces and the mounted po
lice continued firing while chasing the people
up to Sherpur and Hussainpur villages. They ra
ided and searched the houses of Sherpur village
and broke open the doors. They gave severe beatings
with rifle butts and lathis to whoever came in
their way. They arrested more than 20 pers
ons from Sherpur village including Mr. Sukhdev Singh
Sandhu, Advocate, who was sitting with Jathedar Iqbal Singh, in his house.
The mounted police did not stop firing even at the farm housed 2 KM away from the place of
occurrence. According to the residents of Sher
pur village a reign of terror was let loose. They
showed several spent bullet cartridges, said to have
been fired by the Mounted Police in the fields
near Hussainpur. They also showed bullet marks on
the walls of the houses of the other side of the
village. The police registered a case FIR No 54 dated 4.2.86 under Sections
307/362/427/332/188/148/149, 511 of IPC and 25/27 of
Arms act, at Police Station (PS) Nakodar
against the victims of Police high-handedness.
THE FINDINGS
According to FIR No 54 lodged by Inspector, Jaskirat Singh, SHO, PS Nakodar, the Police
received information at 1.00 PM that 250/300 arme
d persons after hijacking a Bus were coming to
Sherpur bridge to enter the curfew bound town
. Under the command of SP (Operations) Mr.
Ashwani Kumar Sharma, a big Police force including Mr. Gopal Singh Ghuman, DSP, Patel of
CRPF, Hardial Singh, Inspector, Jalandhar along with
other officers of the District rushed to the
Sherpur Bridge along with tear gas squads and
the forces of BSF (Border Security Force) and
CRPF (Central Reserve Police Force).
Concoction by SHO
According to the Police Inspector, Jaskirat Singh,
700/800 persons armed with unsheathed Kirpans
and pick-axes collected at the Sherpur Bridge.
Mr. Harminder Singh Sandhu, Mr. Paramjit Singh

Malhi, Mr. Roshan Singh Mehmowal, and Mr
. Sukhdev Singh Sandhu, Advocate, were also
present and performed "ardas" (prayer).
"Today by disobeying the Curfew order we will oppo
se the police and by entering the town we will
take revenge on the other party and just as we
had snatched rifles from the youth workers in
Amritsar, we will snatch them from the Police."
The FIR further recorded that the police gave
a warning through the public address system and
resorted to a lathi charge, fired from riot guns
and exploded tear gas shells, but to no avail. Rather
the mob started firing at the police party and thereafter the police and the CRPF opened fire in self-
defence killing three unidentified persons and
injuring eight on the spot. Mr. Harminder Singh
Sandhu and Giani Roshan Singh were amongst the inju
red. I too fired two shots from my service
revolver and arrested 14 persons from the spot.
After site inspection and meeti
ng persons connected with the incident, the Committee is of the
view that the contents of the Police version cont
ained in the FIR are a sheer concoction and is far
removed from the reality.
The persons participating in the procession wanted
to have "Darshan" of the burnt "birs". They
were peaceful, non-violent and un-armed.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question i have is as skeptic, why post a news from 1986? This could inadvertenly/advertently finger youths flames high emotions in youths, as singh559 veer ji rightly said, Non violence must be exercised. If there is recent news regarding this sure post it away, and we all sikhs should be concerned regarding how to resolve on going issues and solve issues within legal frame work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question i have is as skeptic, why post a news from 1986? This could inadvertenly/advertently finger youths flames high emotions in youths, as singh559 veer ji rightly said, Non violence must be exercised. If there is recent news regarding this sure post it away, and we all sikhs should be concerned regarding how to resolve on going issues and solve issues within legal frame work.

The purpose for posting this post is to young Sikhs know what was happening in Punjab after 1984 and how Hindu radicals were provoking Sikhs . Shiv Sena challenging Sikhs is not a new thing .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dhadhi keep Sikh history fresh in our minds. This also is not to be forgotten. Taliban and Shiv Sena are barbaric terrorist organizations. Did the Americans through the legal book at the Taliban? How many Sikhs that don't want the above 1986 information released supported the action of the Americans against the Taliban? Why the double standard? Shiv Sena rapped, murdered, tortured, and beat your brothers, sisters, mothers and fathers in 1984. Yet you cheer for the Americans to take the Taliban out without going through a legal process!!!!

Not to long ago Sikhs heads were chopped off by the Taliban how many of these did you land in prison or did you get hung by the legal system?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shiv sena has very little presence in Punjab.Mostly they are very low level hawkers who are agents

of Congress to create trouble when it suits them. It was a counter force created by Arun Nehru back

in 1980s.

So do not worry about these fringe elements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shiv sena has very little presence in Punjab.Mostly they are very low level hawkers who are agents

of Congress to create trouble when it suits them. It was a counter force created by Arun Nehru back

in 1980s.

So do not worry about these fringe elements.

Based on what information? In Punjab it was Shiv Sena showing resistance to the Sikhs during Bhai Rajoana. Every time the police need conmen to stir the pot they go to Shiv Sena and let them attack innocent Sikhs. Shiv Sena members completed beadbi of Guru Granth Sahib ji. In Delhi not to long ago when the incidents took place it was Shiv Sena attacking Sikhs with rocks and then the police fired on the Sikhs who were trying to protect themselves and those that were around them. Random people just don't start attacking Sikhs, especially when Sikhs are protesting 1984 genocide or asking for their rights.

Also the word you were looking for was not worried, but vigilant. Sikhs stay vigilant of the enemies who can attack at any time. I can tell you why are you wearing a kirpan, don't worry about any attacks as the times when you got attacked so easily are long gone.

Gurbani reminds us to stay vigilant of the 5 vices as they might look to be sleeping, but they can spark when I have dropped by vigilant stance. As the 5 vices rest inside they are also outside us and they come in many forms and try to weaken us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use