Jump to content

Bhai Sahib Bhai Gurbaksh Singh Khalsa's Hunger Strike


ekgurjaskhalsa
 Share

Recommended Posts

SOPW update indicates that the three Burrail Jail Singhs have now agreed to come out on Parole and might be released tomorrow or Monday to go and meet Bhai Gurbaksh Singh Khalsa Ji.

Following recent developments, SOPW Representative RP Singh and two legal experts - Amar Singh Chahal and Harpal Singh Cheema, went to Burail Jail, along with the families of the three Singh's - Shamsher Singh, Gurmit Singh, Lakhwinder Singh. Lengthy discussions took place a
bout the legal aspects surrounding permanent release and the authorities explained the procedure that needs to followed. It was decided that it is in the best interests of the three, to come out on parole in the first instance and then continue with the necessary steps to turn it into a permanent release.

By late evening (India time), the three, agreed and signed the documents, but due to the lateness, they were unable to be released tonight. The jail authorities have said they will try to arrange their release for tomorrow, although this is not usually done on a Sunday, otherwise, they should definitely be able to return home on Monday.

SOPW will continue to monitor closely the developments in this case and we await to see if the Punjab administration honours it's promise, and continues to take all necessary steps to ensure these three Singh's can finally be FREE.


We support Bhai Gurbaksh Singh Khalsa

Akaal hee Akaal!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CNN Reports -

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/12/21/world/asia/sikh-hunger-strike-india/index.html?iref=allsearch

Indian media, and even Punjab media does not cover this legal, peaceful protest for a legitimate cause.

What are the conclusions/lessons Sikhs should learn from Indian/Punjabi media's biased treatment towards Sikhs/Sikh issues.

* Next Genocide of Sikhs by Indian Govt. will happen silently and none of Indian/Punjabi media is going to cover it.

* Indian Govt. may attack Sikh shrines, and none of Indian/Punjabi media will cover it.

* Indian media has all the knowledge and interest of covering a Sikh gay kissing somebody.

* Indian/Punjabi media looks for the smallest-small story in any part of the world where some Sikh has done even a bit of violent/illegal action and covers that story on its frontline terming the story as "A Sikh took this action or blah blah blah in UK", the purpose is to defame the entire Sikh community.

However, has anybody seen any media reporting such as "A Hindu IFS Officer already alleged in corruption charges in India, found guilty of visa abuses in USA"? A Hindu CEO charged of insider trading in USA? A Hindu charged on groping charges of assault onboard a flight of a 60+year old woman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some very blunt insults (and well deserved) hurled at sukhbir, makkad and jathedar by Bhai Sahib Gurbaksh Singh khalsa himself .

100% correct the majority of Sikh institutions are run by Delhi. The Akal Takht , SGPC, Buddha Dal, Nanaksar and many other Sants and Babas have shown by their silence that they are not free and need Delhis approval to decide what they can and cannot do.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CNN coverage

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/12/21/world/asia/sikh-hunger-strike-india/index.html

Sikh farmer on hunger strike in India for prisoners' release

By Harmeet Shah Singh, CNN

December 21, 2013 -- Updated 2021 GMT (0421 HKT)

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

Gurbaksh Singh Khalsa has been on a hunger strike for more than a month

He is demanding the freedom of a group of Sikh separatists

Both sides in the conflict during the 1980s and 1990s committed violations

But some argue that the justice system has been harsher on the Sikhs

(CNN) -- A Sikh farmer in India has surpassed a month on a hunger strike, demanding the release of six men from his community jailed since the 1990s during a period of a deadly Sikh separatist movement in the country.

Gurbaksh Singh Khalsa, 48, began his protest on November 14, his aide, Harpal Singh Cheema, told CNN.

His hunger strike brings attention to the fates of Sikhs who were arrested and convicted for their actions during the separatist movement, but who, unlike others, have not had their sentences shortened.

The fact that other Indians sentenced to life have been released earlier, but not the Sikhs, has some accusing the justice system of discrimination against the group.

Those who support Khalsa's hunger strike say it is long overdue that the cases of those Sikhs be reviewed.

An armed Sikh rebellion operated in Punjab, the heartland of the faith, from the 1980s to the early 1990s, when it was crushed.

Hiding from the massacre: 1984 remembered

Many political leaders were assassinated during the insurgency.

India's then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was killed by her Sikh bodyguards in October 1984, the same year she had ordered a military raid on the Golden Temple, the holiest of the Sikh shrines, to flush out militants holed up inside.

Three of the six convicts whose freedom Khalsa is fighting for were arrested in 1995 for their alleged role in the assassination of Punjab's then-Chief Minister, Beant Singh, in a car bombing. They were sentenced to life in prison.

The others were convicted under a draconian anti-terror law that has since been repealed, civil rights lawyer H.S. Phoolka said.

"It is not unusual to set lifers free after they have served 14 years in prison," Phoolka said. "These prisoners should also be freed, as normalcy returned to Punjab long ago and they should be joining the mainstream now."

International rights groups have accused both the Sikh separatists and Indian forces of serious violations during the insurgency.

The six Sikh inmates are lodged in the jails of the federally-administered territory of Chandigarh and in Punjab, Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh states.

Khalsa is "weak but says he will not end (his hunger strike) until he sees those six prisoners free," his aide said.

Khalsa's protest, which has drawn support from across the Sikh political and religious spectrum, has gained a viral online attention, although the story is not prominent on India's national media.

"A number of Sikhs were falsely arrested, charged and convicted. Many of them are still in jails despite their old age. It's my personal opinion all such prisoners — whichever community they may belong to — should be set free now," said Sukhdev Singh Bhaur, general secretary of the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC), the top Sikh religious administration in Punjab.

"It's up to the discretion of those governments, administrations to reconsider their cases. We are trying our best," Punjab government spokesman Harcharan Bains said.

In India, state authorities can review a lifer's case after a prisoner serving that sentence has spent 14 years, Bains and lawyer Phoolka said.

"But, otherwise, a life sentence means sentence until the last breath of the prisoner," Bains said.

Rights attorneys, however, say authorities are selectively rejecting reviews of Sikh inmates incarcerated during the Punjab militancy.

"There are numerous examples where life convicts have been prematurely released after undergoing imprisonment of 12 to 14 years or even less," Phoolka said. "It is a great discrimination against... because of their religious beliefs."

Meantime, Human Rights Watch, in a statement to CNN, called upon Indian authorities not to let prisoners remain behind the bars beyond their sentences.

"There were serious human rights abuses during the Punjab insurgency," the human rights group said.

Both militants, with their attacks, and the security forces, abusing the now repealed terror law, committed human rights violations, the group said.

Sikhs and rights bodies have also accused successive Indian governments of going soft on high-profile politicians suspected of perpetrating a massacre of Sikhs in and round New Delhi in the wake of Gandhi's assassination.

Official figures put the number of those killed in the 1984 anti-Sikh attacks at 2,733 in the Indian capital alone. Human rights activists say the death toll was much higher.

"Despite the findings of independent commissions, government forces or officials responsible for excesses, including during the 1984 riots, are yet to be properly prosecuted," Human Rights Watch said in its statement.

Himself a Sikh and the country's first non-Hindu head of government, Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh issued a public apology for the deadly events -- 21 years after their occurrence.

"I have no hesitation in apologizing not only to the Sikh community but the whole Indian nation because what took place in 1984 is the negation of the concept of nationhood and what enshrined in our Constitution. So, I am not standing on any false prestige. On behalf of our government, on behalf of the entire people of this country, I bow my head in shame that such thing took place," Singh told India's Parliament in an impassioned address in 2005.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use