Jump to content

If Sikhs Are Vegetarian Because We Respect Life, Then Should We Also Be Vegan?


Moogle1542
 Share

Recommended Posts

This has been bothering me for some time now. It is as the title says, why does our respect for life stop with vegetarianism?

When I suggest Sikhs should consider becoming vegan, it is become of the horrendous atrocities that occur within the dairy industry. Cows are forcefully artificially inseminated so that they get pregnant and lactate (produce milk)post-43736-0-65126600-1409276176_thumb.jpost-43736-0-09951000-1409276179_thumb.j

Their calves are taken from them so they don't drink the profits and then slaughtered for veal.post-43736-0-38833000-1409276181_thumb.j

They spend their whole lives in chains and being abused.post-43736-0-09360700-1409276184_thumb.j

Becoming pregnant and producing milk so often that raw milk is full of blood, puss and infection. They are injected with hormones and bred so that their udders swell to unnatural sizes, causing them immense pain, just so they are able to produce more..post-43736-0-87382400-1409276186_thumb.j

Is this right? Can Sikhi justify this? I've reached a point where I've started to laugh at Sikhs that claim to be righteous because they are vegetarian because to kill for meat is wrong, but don't want to hear about dairy abuse. Is torturing for milk acceptable? It would be more humane to just kill the animal and take its meat rather than let it live and make it suffer!

Perhaps Guruji never condemned the use of milk because perhaps in their time it was different. Perhaps there was not this evil level of greed that exists today. People just took what they needed/could from their farm cows. But times have changed and the treatment of cows in dairy farms is absolutely barbaric.

How can we as Sikhs allow this to happen? The truth about dairy is no secret. There are volumes of information available, just as there are about the truth of meat industries. Yet why have Sikhs not taken an official stand to no longer be part of this cruelty? How can we happily be just vegetarian when true respect and value for life comes from being vegan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, for those who may argue that milk was part of Guruji's diet and there is mention of this in Bani (kheer etc.), or that rejecting milk will lead to rejecting prashaad etc, THERE ARE MANY, FAR HEALTHIER & TASTIER ALTERNATIVES. Coconut milk, almond milk, rice milk are but a few, all of which can be used just as effectively as dairy milk to make the foods we love. A Sikh does not have to give up their lifestyle or pleasures (because who doesn't love barfi?) but they can give up a lifestyle that funds tremendous cruelty.

Perhaps I am asking for too much, but there would be no greater joy regarding this issue than to see Sikh protests and discussions, and ultimately the official decision to end the use of dairy milk. For now I just hope to raise awareness and hope that the trend catches on amongst the Sangat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please like this page and keep upto date on issues ethical regarding your diet.

Guru has said that milk and ghee are the best foods. We should increase their intake, even if it means lowering intake of other foods. Alterntaive milks have artificial derived (and low) nutrition, have been highly processed etc. Real milk is a super food. Medicinal. Has whey, proteins, omega 3 fats, a complete food. Sadly ALL supermarket milk, including organic, is plastic milk. Dead. Pasterised and homoginised.

RAW milk is the way to go. Our sangat of over 70 familes has been consuming raw milk for over a year now (some for a few years). Healths have massively improved for all. Kids who would not touch milk, love this milk. People with asthma abe eczma have seen big improvements in health. Weight-strength trainerers use this as the original protein shake (it has whey and proteins in complete natural form). Most nutrition is killed in regular pasterisation process.

Raw milk also has all the beneficial bacteria still alive. Boosting your immune system. This is one of the fundamental purposes of milk, that which copycat milk cannot replicate.

If anyone is interesting in joining our sangat co-op of getting raw milk from the most ethical farm in the country get in touch on the facebook page or on khalsaethics@gmail.com. This is a not for profit seva using numbers to play the ethical economics game.

The farm we use feeds cows organic only. Has acres of fields which they graze the cozw on daily. Milk them only once a day. Calves live with mums for between 6-9 months AND cows are officially retired after milk producing days are over. Cows here live to around 12-14 years as opposed to 4-5 in the regular high intensity industrial dairy industry.

Please read:

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=840783775934371&id=819349488077800

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=830012770344805&id=819349488077800

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=829842553695160&id=819349488077800

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=823339317678817&id=819349488077800

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=822468654432550&substory_index=0&id=819349488077800

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please like this page and keep upto date on issues ethical regarding your diet.

Guru has said that milk and ghee are the best foods. We should increase their intake, even if it means lowering intake of other foods. Alterntaive milks have artificial derived (and low) nutrition, have been highly processed etc. Real milk is a super food. Medicinal. Has whey, proteins, omega 3 fats, a complete food. Sadly ALL supermarket milk, including organic, is plastic milk. Dead. Pasterised and homoginised.

RAW milk is the way to go. Our sangat of over 70 familes has been consuming raw milk for over a year now (some for a few years). Healths have massively improved for all. Kids who would not touch milk, love this milk. People with asthma abe eczma have seen big improvements in health. Weight-strength trainerers use this as the original protein shake (it has whey and proteins in complete natural form). Most nutrition is killed in regular pasterisation process.

Raw milk also has all the beneficial bacteria still alive. Boosting your immune system. This is one of the fundamental purposes of milk, that which copycat milk cannot replicate.

If anyone is interesting in joining our sangat co-op of getting raw milk from the most ethical farm in the country get in touch on the facebook page or on khalsaethics@gmail.com. This is a not for profit seva using numbers to play the ethical economics game.

The farm we use feeds cows organic only. Has acres of fields which they graze the cozw on daily. Milk them only once a day. Calves live with mums for between 6-9 months AND cows are officially retired after milk producing days are over. Cows here live to around 12-14 years as opposed to 4-5 in the regular high intensity industrial dairy industry.

Please read:

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=840783775934371&id=819349488077800

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=830012770344805&id=819349488077800

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=829842553695160&id=819349488077800

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=823339317678817&id=819349488077800

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=822468654432550&substory_index=0&id=819349488077800

This is interesting, however I would have to argue against your claim that milk alternatives are 'artificial' when they can easily be made at home. Rice, coconuts and almonds are very much real superfoods and do not become 'artificial' when they are made into milks. Of course this is probably not the case with supermarket versions, theres not much you can trust these days regarding them.

That being said, the sad reality is that for 99% of people the milk we use will come from the supermarket which will fund cruelty. Even if there are more 'ethical' standards available, it still keeps the demand for milk alive, which will ultimately keep the supply alive. As long as we want milk, the dairy industry will grow, and these atrocities will be allowed to happen.

How important is it to keep milk in our diets over the lives of living, breathing and feeling creatures? Yes, you can provide all the nutritional benefits of milk, although there are many debates surrounding this anyway, but then how does that differ from the meat eater vs vegetarian arguments? The meat eater will argue all the nutritional benefits of meat, and the vegetarian will try to explain how there are alternatives that are just as good. Now the vegetarian is arguing all the nutritional benefits of milk, and the vegan is trying to explain how there are plant based alternatives that provide just as much nutrition.

In response to your own farm, I think it is important you lay out exactly how it functions. What happens to the calves once they are taken from their mothers? What happens to cows once they are retired? Do you practice artificial insemination? How many times on average do your cows become pregnant in their lifetimes so they can give milk? Do you make sure that the calves are weaned properly and given as much of their mothers milk as they need (because after all, it is theirs before it is ours)? Once the cows have died, what do you do with their bodies?

Can you ensure that your farm is 100% ethical, moral and humane? Because if it is not 100%, even if it is 99%, then there remains that 1% in which you are taking advantage of a living creature for your own gain, and I personally cannot condone such a thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

to take this point even further it could be said that all food should be ethically sourced and produced. so food produced by slave or low paid workers should be avoided. food which has resulted in animals habitats being destroyed should be avoided. food which has travelled thousands of miles should be avoided as it pollutes the planet. many other points could be made also. it will eventually prove too difficult to feed everyone i think.

on a seperate point: members of many religions are allowed to eat meat and some people can only survive by eating meat (people living near the north pole/siberia and people living in jungles) so why is it ok for some people and not others? do meat eaters have zero chance of union with god?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry but we eat meat, we ain't Hindoos

Yes I am aware that some do, however some do not and are vegetarian. If you are a meat eater then of course this post will have no interest to you - unless you are more empathic towards dairy industries than meat industries.

Please do not comment saying 'we eat meat' so as to discredit this discussion when I'm sure you are fully aware that others do not. This post is for vegetarians, although I'm sure the discussion will welcome your opinions.

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes that was original Granth by Guru Arjan Dev in 1604. The original one still exists. 10th Guru added 116 hymns of his father. This is called copy of Damdama and declared Guru.  
    • Isn't there Adi Granth as well?
    • 1) Guru Granth Sahib with 5,894 hymns. (Note this Granth was given Guruship). It has 1430 pages. Granths by Guru Gobind Singh :-  2) Dasam Granth with 17,293 verses in 1428 pages. 3) Sarbloh Granth in 4,361 stanzas 862 pages in print. There are number of other works by various poets like Suraj Parkash, Bhai Gurdas and Nand Lal.
    • Man just learn boxing or take a shastar training. You don't have a 2 foot talwar or khanda in 2025's Western World. Today ur either gonna get stabbed (uk), shot (America) or attacked by a meth head (Punjab) in street fights. By the time u draw the sword that guy's got you on the floor probably searching your Kacherra for coins lol Only good thing he did was the Loh Mushti video (boxing with the kara as a knuckleduster) but even then just get a normal knuckleduster if you can. Though before ANYTHING any Sikh interested in martial arts has to train two things as the bare minimum: UNARMED FIGHTING (boxing preferably) and KIRPAN TRAINING. Loh Mushti is good but only when you lost ur kirpan somehow in a fight (which shouldn't rlly happen if you train on how to use it. If the bad guys wanna use knives n guns then the Khalsa who's here to stop em has to better at their own game than them. NO Sikh in America has an excuse not to own a gun, and if their state allows public carry they should be the first to accept it.
    • Sikhs have missed the point: Shastar Vidhiya means "the science of (hand-held) weapons", not just the style nihangs do or gatka. Gatka and "shastar vidhiya" are "bad" for 2 reasons: You can't actually practice them properly cos its deadly. Same issue with karate; you can't free spar full force with traditional techniques cos someone'd probably die, so its impracticality goes unchecked. But boxing spars full force, so you know what works. And if you ever do have to defend someone w gatka and the thug has a stick too (unlikely) you wouldn't know how to take a full force hit cos in training you had to take it light. That one hit will shake you more than you realise and probably make u lose if ur not used to it.  You likely don't carry a 2 foot sword/gatka stick in the West unless going to training. And a thug doesn't either; he's got a knife (uk) or a gun (USA . Gatka may beat knife, but even field hockey sticks will beat someone with a normal knife cos of reach, gatka di lorh nhi haegi specifically. But if they got a gun, the only defence is quicker draw time and better aim (which you'll learn at shooting class, never at gatka) Basically, Guru Gobind Singh Ji told us to learn "the science of weapons" to defend people, but we train an art with a weapon nobody carries today (nobody takes a gatka stick when they step out to get atta) and one that we can never spar with fully and thus we don't even know what it feels like to get hit with it properly. If you train to preserve history or perform shows, then that's fine. But it's NOT part of a Sikh's military training anymore and won't help you much in fights (for which we must be "tyaar by tyaar" , always ready).  (PS: Gatka may have a few skills like movement and observation that can help in fights, but all its practical stuff like that is also in MMA, plus much more. Nothing that's exclusive to arts like gatka will help practically).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use