Jump to content

Sydney Girl Becomes The First Turbaned Sikh Female Fashion Blogger


SinghStation
 Share

Recommended Posts

Karan Kaur seems to be a walking talking contradiction.

Dastar, and yet clearly cut and styled eyebrows.

Dastar, and yet covered in make-up.

Dastar, and yet no kirpan.

Why exactly is she wearing a dastar ?

I can't help feeling she's using it as a gimmick to get ahead.

If you look at the make up of her followers it is loads of Musaliya who have same attitude to wearing hijab. Point of hijab is keep a humble, decent non-provocative image but now it also is a fashion item topping tight, tight clothes and madeup faces , it really says don't objectify me, not. The musaliya love the image of the dastar so much ...they are training each other on how to tie their hijabs like dastars .

We (females) need to check what we are doing and what signals it sends out ...before we slip all the way down and also drag guroop into the mud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who are they ji? First time i am hearing about them. Do you have link about them?

http://www.singhstreetstyle.com/

It's pretty much the male version of the same thing, yet these guys get loads more support from us lot than the bibi does. Everyone is thrilled when they appear in magazines and on billboards.

Just think about it, peeps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lastly, I want to say that one might not agree with the make-up

What you mean "don't agree" ? Thats like saying "I know some of you don't agree with murder and rape but..." :stupidme:

There is no debate about the issue. It is not an issue that has different sides of opinion. Everybody, except you, knows that as n amritdhari dastar wearer she can not, under any circumstances, trim her eyebrows / make-up etc. If she wants to do that, thats fine, but she obviously needs to take off the dastar. As you can see from all her photos, she has actually taken off her kirpan and so is actually probably no longer an amritdhari. However, she has chosen to keep the dastar because it is her gimmick / tool for career publicity.

It's pretty much the male version of the same thing

You obviously possess a dodgy dictionary that has a strange definition of the words "same thing" but how exactly are people making it clear they are trimmed non-amritdharis be the "same thing" as someone making it clear they ARE Amritdhari ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody is wrong in this thread. We sure live in a hypocritical world. The problem is that when we see a turbani wearing bibi, our first reaction is that she is amritdhari. However when we see banda in turban then we don't see him as amritdhari unless he is wearing kirpan outside.

Going off-topic now -

If we see banda with turban in front of teka/sharab/liquor vendor in punjab we don't get instant mad because it becomes so normal in punjab (back in time we might beat him). Now if we see bibi with turban @ such 'not so good location', it would boil our blood. The problem is that guy with turban doing bad stuff in normal while bibi in turban is expected to have high moral because society see them at higher status level. Sad thing is that bibian are now also adapting to negative stuff of what paag vallay banday - though still rare but its happening. It is wrong for us to see both male and female turban wearing ppl with the same eye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Part of the problem is the hostilities between India and Pakistan. If the border were open, Amritsar would easily become a huge trading city. Secondly, the National Highways Authority of India is constructing a new 6-lane expressway from Kashmir, through Amritsar/Jalandhar/Ludhiana to Dehli which will be part of the Ludhiana-Delhi-Kolkatta Industrial Corridor.  Maps of the New Silk Road show Kolkata as a key part of the "road". The Punjab to Kolkata expressway and rail connections will fulfill the ability to hook up to the New Silk Road.  In addition, while crossing to Pakistan via AH1 (Asian Highway 1) is difficult, India does connect to AH1 on the other side, towards the East. Finally, Punjab can trade with the world via Mundra port in Gujurat. Rail to Mundra, then sea onwards. Dubai is very close with a free port. If you send products to Iran, there are ground links onward to Europe.
    • Yeah, that's one possibility. Another I initially thought is that it's a Muslim trying to gather info. But then, you might ask, how does he know about Sikh textual sources. Well, you'd be surprised at their resourcefulness. A final possibility is he's a weak Sikh who was asked a question by a non-Sikh and now he's suddenly feverishly wondering where it's "written" that you can't marry a young child. To the latter, I would say, you're looking in the wrong spot. Gurbani isn't a 1428 page rulebook, like Leviticus or the Vedas: ਸਿਮ੍ਰਿਤਿ ਸਾਸਤ੍ਰ ਪੁੰਨ ਪਾਪ ਬੀਚਾਰਦੇ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਬਾਝਹੁ ਤਤੈ ਸਾਰ ਨ ਜਾਣੀ ॥ The Simritis and Shastras discriminate between charity and sin, but know not the essence of the Real Thing. Without the Guru, they know not the essence of the Reality, know not the essence of the Reality. Anand Sahib.
    • You're confusing two different things: One is merely adding starch to a turban to get a certain feel to the fabric. The other is tying your turban once and taking it off like a hat. It is this that people have a problem with. What's wrong with it is that Rehit says to tie your turban afresh every time. If you ask, "Where is that written?", it's written in Bhai Nand Lal ji's Rehitnama. @ipledgeblue didn't just make it up. Umm, no, bro. We're not evangelical Christians like President George W Bush of the US claiming to "talk to God" who told him to invade Iraq. "Speaking to him directly" basically ends up being doing whatever you feel like with the excuse that Guru ji told you to do it. If you still want to take your turban off like a hat, feel free to do so, but don't claim that it's Rehit.
    • You don't need to wear either a pag or dumalla in the gym. You can simply wear a meter or 1.5m small turban (gol pagg or round turban). It doesn't come off.
    • The reason you don't see anything wrong with it is because like a fish in water, you grew up in Western culture and imbibed it fully. It's very difficult to for parents to inculcate traditional culture while in the West. The reason there is a problem is because a kiss between a man and wife is a sexual act (I didn't say it's coitus, but it's still sexual.) By contrast a kiss between a mother and a child, for example, is not sexual. And in our culture, sexual acts are not allowed in public. Goras do allow it. And that's also the reason they have gay pride parades now with people walking around naked with children in attendance and so forth.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use