Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The sangat that listens to Dhunda speeches should pay attention to the first 4 minutes of the video very closely. After watching the video did you catch the deception he played with you? Rewind the video to 2:20 and you hear Dhunda saying couple of lines of Gurbani to prove his point. Right afterwards he says these lines are on ang 732 of Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji. I became curious to read the whole shabad and opened up ang 732 of Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji. I read the shabad and no where can I find the first line raam raam karathaa sabh jag firai raam n paaeiaa jaae in Raag Sohee written by Sri Guru Raam Das ji on ang 732. Instead I found the above line on ang 555 in Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji Maharaj and is in the shabad of Sri Guru Amar Das Ji in Raag Bihaagraa.

So please ask yourself, why did Dhunda join two lines together of Gurbani which don't come after each other and say they are on ang 732? Is your loyalty with Dhunda higher or with presenting Gurbani as Guru Sahib wrote it?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

How do we know it's not an honest mistake? I don't really like missionaries or Darshan Singh Ragi's cult, but I want to know if he apologized.

Because over the years with his speeches there is a pattern of him making statements and then strictly saying he never said it. In this very video Dhunda says, I never said Dasam Bani is not Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji's Bani. Yet he has come out and said Bachittar Natak is not the Bani of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji in the past. He has insulted Chaupai Sahib in the past and said he never said it and now in this video says he reads the very Bani he insulted. In the above video I post, Dhunda says he speaks up against manmat. Yet in a video with Inder Ghagga he is seen to be silent when Inder Ghagga calls Naam Simran manmat. The video is on youtube as well. There is a clear pattern of events that show how he manipulates and twist Gurbani to sell his speeches.

Search this site for all the evidence you are looking for. Over the years the posters have done a great job of tracking Dhunda's acts.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Because over the years with his speeches there is a pattern of him making statements and then strictly saying he never said it. In this very video Dhunda says, I never said Dasam Bani is not Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji's Bani. Yet he has come out and said Bachittar Natak is not the Bani of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji in the past. He has insulted Chaupai Sahib in the past and said he never said it and now in this video says he reads the very Bani he insulted. In the above video I post, Dhunda says he speaks up against manmat. Yet in a video with Inder Ghagga he is seen to be silent when Inder Ghagga calls Naam Simran manmat. The video is on youtube as well. There is a clear pattern of events that show how he manipulates and twist Gurbani to sell his speeches.

Search this site for all the evidence you are looking for. Over the years the posters have done a great job of tracking Dhunda's acts.

true I heard a speech where he did kinta prantu on amrit bania then another video watched the same day from YT he denounced that accusation that he ever questioned anything about amrit sanchar. As far as I can tell he is not amritdhari ... and this is the whole thing we know jack about his motivation yet give him stage time , why?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Jacfsing2

Because over the years with his speeches there is a pattern of him making statements and then strictly saying he never said it. In this very video Dhunda says, I never said Dasam Bani is not Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji's Bani. Yet he has come out and said Bachittar Natak is not the Bani of Sri Guru Gobind Singh Sahib ji in the past. He has insulted Chaupai Sahib in the past and said he never said it and now in this video says he reads the very Bani he insulted. In the above video I post, Dhunda says he speaks up against manmat. Yet in a video with Inder Ghagga he is seen to be silent when Inder Ghagga calls Naam Simran manmat. The video is on youtube as well. There is a clear pattern of events that show how he manipulates and twist Gurbani to sell his speeches.

Search this site for all the evidence you are looking for. Over the years the posters have done a great job of tracking Dhunda's acts.

So, he never Chacked Amrit is what you're telling me? Dasam bani is part of Amrit.
Link to post
Share on other sites

The sangat that listens to Dhunda speeches should pay attention to the first 4 minutes of the video very closely. After watching the video did you catch the deception he played with you? Rewind the video to 2:20 and you hear Dhunda saying couple of lines of Gurbani to prove his point. Right afterwards he says these lines are on ang 732 of Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji. I became curious to read the whole shabad and opened up ang 732 of Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji. I read the shabad and no where can I find the first line raam raam karathaa sabh jag firai raam n paaeiaa jaae in Raag Sohee written by Sri Guru Raam Das ji on ang 732. Instead I found the above line on ang 555 in Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji Maharaj and is in the shabad of Sri Guru Amar Das Ji in Raag Bihaagraa.

So please ask yourself, why did Dhunda join two lines together of Gurbani which don't come after each other and say they are on ang 732? Is your loyalty with Dhunda higher or with presenting Gurbani as Guru Sahib wrote it?

Nice work. This dhunda is trying to impress the sangat who may not do the research required because they think he a a genuine gyani. Throwing in book names, chapters and verse numbers seems to impress some people a la zakir naik, who comes across the same as he has a photographic memory. The sangat hear these ang numbers and think this guy has a good education on Gurbani.

Dhunda and his sangh sabha canada have been a tour of panjab over the last week spreading their ignorance around, and no-one seems to be countering them.

We need to be proactive on social media as sangh sabha are using it too well and their fanbase is unfortunately growing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing is Chatanga, sangat doesn't care about the likes of dhunda spewing his filth on stage. We are more worried about the likes of Nidar Singh, more worried about the BBC Asian networks debates,more worried about what caste is doing more damage to sikhi. We need to stop hiding and face the real issues in the panth and stop focsusing on fools who we should not spare a word on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • as long as no major panthic figure lays ungli on them lol  implausible at current state of affairs  we can have three sets shrimoni akali panth panj pyare of sikh sarbat khalsa along with 5 mukte and 25 mahakaali/giani singhs a mukhi of a really major dal (budha dal, taksal, akj, nkj, all the new ones lol) arent allowed to be in panj pyare or ppanj mukte  panj pyare can have more politically involved sikhs, meanwhile panj mukte be more panthic type folks like late bhai jugraj singh  one seat of panj mukte reconsidered every 2-4 years (some seats for 3, some for 4, one for 2) two of panj pyare for life till removed by 21 or more of mahakaal/giani (scholars, veterans, raagis, etc.) (i dont know how these are selected but perhaps a combination unanimously approved by 40 legislators mentioned below, they can be for life) other three chosen every 4-5 years by panj mukte  panj mukte advise panj pyare in joint session under a mukh diwan and meet diwan (chief minister of joint panj pyare/panj mukte session, secretariat minister of mahakaal assembly) who try to set up meetings and agenda and are chosen by small body of 40 legislators (need 37 or more to become) representing different parts of world and india and punjab and sampardiye that can be removed only if other 28 or more demand so  52 sewadars of sarbat khalsa enforce gurmattas under supervision of meet diwan third set of panch is akal thakt panj pyare (jathedari of akal thakt can be abolished) of which four must be most senior mahakaali singhs (the 25) and only one can be young if approved by same margin meet diwan is, this is like the jurisdiction that can remove a panj pyara anytime and de-ratify a gurmatta anytime  replaces sgpc gursikhs like baba nihal singh harianbela, giani pinderpal singh, that are admired or at least tolerated by most of panth are good candidates for panj mukte or panj pyara positions until we harvest a youth full of potential  a panj pyare can never be a panj mukta, a panj mukta can never be a panj pyare after retiring from former position mukh diwaan cannot be a former panj pyare akal thakt panj pyare cannot be former mukh diwan, and after retiring cannot serve panj pyara sarbat khalsa takes oath of restricting political activism to a certain region (perhaps pakistan punjab, punjab, haryana and maybe j&k, himachal, rajasthan) and beyond this region it confines itself to humanitarian relief, activism for sikh rights, gurudwara management, gurmatta/maryada enforcement) a politican isnt allowed from a another party to serve any position in this sarbat khalsa system but sarbat khalsa can recommend or back a panthic sikh up for a seat in the prescribed region  constitution (prescribing values of economic and relgiious freedoms, and promoting a federalist republican structure in india that candidates backed by sarbat khalsa must adhere to), code of honour (for scholars,intellectuals,officials), rehat maryada (mostly adopted from prior one) sikh intellectual council of free thought, free space for all sorts of intellectuals to discuss ideas, and a ultimate sikh reference library for all; presided by council of five elders (one chief elder) selected by mahakaali council that maintains order and intellectual integrity amongst this diaspora where intellectuals, scientists, theologicians, can freely correspond with each other and release findings (I wish bhai vir singh ji or professor puran singh ji were alive lol) sikh education front, trying to spread parchar in world, and impart worldy knowledge of stem onto youth in the north indian region described above (as our youth is behind rest of india)  revised anandpur da matta, reinforcing punjab's demand for autonomy, riparian rights, and additional territory (that we can get with help of our sikh education front working to spread sikhi in those areas and literate the poor with punjabi and other wordly stem sciences) we will harvest intellectuals, sikhs, and a stronger panth we would also need a team of lawyers to fight the cases in high court and supreme court for the matters discussed in above revision of anandpur matta, and maybe we can allign ourselves with whatever the punjab govt is at time in such legal battles against center for betterment of punjab i think i got carried away, maybe panj pyare system is better for individual gurudwaras lol although we can't have a autocracy with all the division in the panth either like we used to under diwan darbara singh ji, nawab kapur singh ji, sardar jassa singh ahluwalia  
    • really nice thread 👍 
    • idk if it is but if it is the r/sikh mod he is nice and not rude...
    • is it the same turbanator from youtube who comment on every basics of sikhi video 
    • yes bibi rajni was married off to a leper by her father for her refusal to worship him instead of raam/gopal/akaal purakh she remained firm and took her husband village to village and was now thrown into a life of poverty she was married to a disabled man with leprosy and was told by her father to deal with the consequences of not worshipping him and told her to go find her waheguru/akaal purakh/raam now she carried her leper husband in a tokra basket on her head through villages and did work like a banjaras at different households until she reached amritsar sarovar she left (probably for work), while husband went for sarovar and when he came out he was cured (some versions say sikh villagers around told him to jap waheguru as he took the dip) he held onto a twig on a tree with his pinky so he wouldnt drown as he took ishnan he was cured but bibi rajni his wife did not recognize him so there was commotion to which villagers told them to go to dhan dhan sri guru raam das ji to whom bibi rajni begged for the man in front of her to be punished thinnking he killed her husband  but guru sahib told the (husband) to show his chichi (pinky finger) which wasn't dipped in the sarovar and thus remained with leper marks which proved that he was indeed the husband (he was told by guru sahib to dip the finger and his finger was cured as well to which bibi rajni believed him) duni chand the arrogant father of bibi rajni came and asked for forgiveness, and i think he had four daughters or so and no son and thus adopted the former lepor as his son  one of my favorite sakhis from childhood 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use